1 / 32

CSIN Seminar Understanding Indicators March 2, 2010 3:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m.

yardley
Download Presentation

CSIN Seminar Understanding Indicators March 2, 2010 3:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Cory Searcy, IISD Maureen Hart, Sustainable Measures CSIN Seminar Understanding Indicators March 2, 2010 3:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

    2. Agenda Introduction and Overview Introduction to Indicators Developing Indicators Key Considerations Group Discussion Questions and Next steps

    3. Goals and Indicators Goal – a description of future condition community members wish to achieve Indicator – a numeric measure that provides key information about conditions and trends System level Organizational/program level Activity/action level

    4. Goals or Indicators Which Comes First? Indicators: clarify and specify what a goal means track movement towards or away from the goal

    5. Need to be used as part of an ongoing process Need to be linked to goals Can be used to Raise awareness Engage stakeholders Inform decisions Measure progress Indicators are tools

    6. Traditional Thinking

    7. Sustainable Systems Thinking

    8. Sustainability Indicators: Measure a key sustainability issue: Carrying capacity of community capital Equity (inter- and intra-generational) Long-term balance between economic, social, and environmental goals Focus on system level rather than organization, program or action level Measure outcomes, not inputs or outputs Show long-term progress towards sustainable economic, social, and environmental quality of life

    9. Examples of Sustainability Issues and Indicators

    10. More Examples of Sustainability Issues and Indicators

    11. Discussion Question 1 How do these indicators reflect characteristics of sustainability indicators?

    12. Developing SD Indicators In general, there are two approaches used to develop SD indicators: Use indicators developed and tested by others. Develop indicators specifically tailored to the context in which they will be used. There are many guidelines and standard sets of indicators available to support the first approach. National: UN CSD Indicators. Regional: Sustainable Calgary. Organizational: Global Reporting Initiative. There is no universally applicable methodology for developing indicators to support the second approach, but guidelines are available.

    13. Developing SD Indicators A Sustainable Development Indicator Design Process Conduct needs assessment. Conduct process planning. Develop a draft system of indicators. Test and adjust the indicators. Implement the indicators. Review and improve.

    14. Develop a Draft System of Indicators

    15. A conceptual framework is a set of interrelated concepts, principles, and ideas that help organize and direct thinking about a particular issue. An effective framework should help determine priorities in the choice of indicators and help communicate those choices to interested stakeholders (Hardi and Zdan, 1997). There are three common classifications of frameworks: Scope: Goals, Issues, Domains. Location: Geographic Location, Organization Level. Process: Input-Process-Output, PSR. Develop a Conceptual Framework

    16. The key issues / aspects that the indicators must address must be identified and defined. Key stakeholders should be involved. Linkages between the issues should be considered. This is normally an iterative process. Identify Key Issues

    17. Choosing the indicators is a challenging task! Indicator selection criteria are developed to guide choices. The final criteria is always at the discretion of those involved. Sample criteria: Understandable, Actionable, Relevant, Credible, Illustrative, Provide Linkages, etc. Guiding principles: Data does not need to be currently available, but measurement should be possible. Must be acceptable to those involved in its use. Develop Indicator Selection Criteria

    18. This is typically an iterative process and will vary from case to case. Example Process: (1) develop a pool of indicators, (2) consolidate the pool of indicators, and (3) finalize the draft system of indicators. Key Considerations: The distribution between generic vs. unique indicators. The number of indicators to include in the system. The relationship of the indicators to each other. The relationship of the indicators to existing infrastructure. The need for consultation with those who will use the indicators. The appropriateness of developing a composite index. Develop a Draft System of Indicators

    19. Three key tests: Has anything been missed? / Do the indicators address the issues? Is there any redundancy in the system? Are all of the proposed indicators actually going to be used? Review Indicators

    20. Discussion Question 2 What are some of the key sustainable development issues for your organization? What are some of the criteria you could use to develop/select an appropriate framework?”

    21. What gets measured, gets managed (what isn’t measured, is often ignored) Two different levels System level, sustainability indicator Organizational or Program level performance indicators System level: Big picture, long term view Not entirely under organizational control Often ‘implied’ in organizational goals rather than explicitly stated Organization/Program level: Link programs, policies and actions to system level Provide information about organization’s contribution to system level sustainability

    22. Who is in charge? Actors and Issues

    23. Who is in charge? Actors and Issues

    24. Who is in charge? Actors and Issues

    25. Annual GHG regional emissions compared to 1990 baseline MARC Number of municipalities that have signed on to the US Conference of Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement Number of municipalities that have completed a emissions inventory Total emissions reported annually by municipalities Municipalities GHG Emissions from municipal operations Chamber of Commerce Number of businesses that have signed on to the Greater Kansas City Climate Protection Partnership Total emissions reported by businesses Utilities Number of customers who have done an energy audit Total emissions by residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional classifications System and Program Indicators for: Climate Change

    26. Percent of regional land that is permeable MARC Number of miles/acres of Metro Green plan completed Number of municipalities and counties with adequate green infrastructure standards, regulations and ordinances Percent of regional stream miles with riparian buffers Municipalities Percent of development projects permitted that include land conservation Total amount of open space permanently protected Developers Percent of project area that is preserved as green infrastructure Home Owners Percent of land developed vs land providing ecosystem services System and Program Indicators for : Green Infrastructure

    27. Discussion Question 3 Select an organization or issue area to work on as a group What would you see as the key system level indicators for your organization or issue? Identify key actors (who needs to be involved and needs to have program level measures that link to system level?) What would you see as your key program level indicators that tie into the system level indicators?

    28. Key Questions to Consider: What is the purpose of the indicators (raise awareness, inform decisions, monitor progress)? Who is the audience and how will they use the indicators? Who needs to be involved (including intended audience and keepers of the data)? What will be the scope and boundaries of the indicator system (geographic area, topic areas)? What will the balance be between ideal and do-able? What framework is most appropriate?

    29. The Process Matters! The process by which indicators are developed is as important as the final product Collaboration is the key because indicators must: measure something that is publicly valued be understood by those who will use them be seen as credible and meaningful be linked (conceptually and practically) to policies and actions Process must include the decision makers and the data managers Must be a common expectation that the indicators will be reported, discussed and linked to action on a regular basis

    30. Discussion What are some of the key cautions to keep in mind when designing indicators?

    31. Key Challenges

    32. A network of organizations and individuals using community indicators to inform decisions and create change Broad range of issue: General: quality of life, healthy community, sustainability Specific topics: education, health Conferences, outreach, technical assistance, webinars, research projects Current project – integrating community indicators and organizational performance measures Community Indicators Consortium www.communityindicators.net

More Related