50 likes | 196 Views
Physics Goals for New Science Building. More better quality space Should allow for expansion of physics department (30 year plan!) New nanotech labs New integrated space for HEP+Shop New planetarium. New Science Building Plan. The problem: $29M available Existing plan costs $37M
E N D
Physics Goals for New Science Building • More better quality space • Should allow for expansion of physics • department (30 year plan!) • New nanotech labs • New integrated space for HEP+Shop • New planetarium
New Science Building Plan • The problem: • $29M available • Existing plan costs $37M • 3) Chemistry teaching labs must go in new building • What this means: • 29/37*189,600 available = 148,600 sq ft • 148,600*.6=89,200 assignable sq ft • compared with 113,800 in default building • So shortfall is 24,600 assignable sq ft • If Science Ed (5000 asqft) and classsrooms • (12500) moved to science hall remaining shortfall • is 7100 asqft
Acceptable Solutions • 1) Administration finds extra $2.3M • Need 89,200+7,100=96,300 so • (96,300/113,800)*$37M=$31.3M • Build biggest building that you can • with chemistry+physics splitting the • shortfall. Each must subtract ~3500 asqft • Internal recommendation: Physics • teaching labs are 9550 asqft. All of this • or 7650 (1900 is astronomy labs) could • be left in science hall, until a new • teaching building is built. This would • allow us some expansion space. • Build Physics Research Building • This would be 52000+12,500 (chem labs) • 64,500 asqft would be about $19.5M • Rest could be used to renovate Science Hall • for chemistry, science ed, etc.
Other Solutions • Build ANOTHER new CRB • with remaining ~$15M allocated to • upgrading Science Hall (Phase 3), • where SH becomes Physics Hall. • (downside includes 2 new CRB’s one • old PRB, will be encroached on by • other users, live in a building for 2 years • that is being modified. Upside could get • more space, basement guys don’t have to • move). • Various options that split up physics • department
Other Issues • Expansion space is an important issue • and should not be neglected • Current division still not equitable: • Don’t forget there is a CRB • Example: Faculty offices • Chem Faculty 11x250 • Chem Adjunct faculty 10x120 • Chem Lounges 3x350 • Total: 5,000 • (and this is for ½ the faculty!) • Phys Faculty 10x250 • Phys Faculty 6x180 • Phys Fac/adjunct 8x150 • Total: 4,780! • Why less space, no lounge, 2 tiers and • only 16 faculty?