1 / 19

Responding to the Downturn in Recycling Markets Municipal Waste Association

Responding to the Downturn in Recycling Markets Municipal Waste Association. February 5, 2009. Presentation Outline. History of Residential Blue Box System Net Costs & Funding Municipal Funding under BBPP MIPC’s Actions re Commodity Markets. Historical BB System Costs. Year 1 (2004)

yestin
Download Presentation

Responding to the Downturn in Recycling Markets Municipal Waste Association

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Responding to the Downturn in Recycling MarketsMunicipal Waste Association February 5, 2009

  2. Presentation Outline • History of Residential Blue Box System Net Costs & Funding • Municipal Funding under BBPP • MIPC’s Actions re Commodity Markets

  3. Historical BB System Costs • Year 1 (2004) • Limited 2002 data on net system cost • AMO & SO agreement on net system cost • Year 2 (2005) • Based on actual reported 2003 costs

  4. Historical BB System Costs 1) 5/12ths of annual funding 2) 6/12ths of annual funding

  5. Historical BB System Costs • Years 3 & 4 (2006 & 2007) • WDO Cost Containment Plan implemented • Reasonable cost bands applied to 2004 & 2005 costs • ODRP tonnes, costs & revenues deducted for 2007 funding • Year 5 & 6 (2008 & 2009) • Based on actual reported 2006 & 2007 costs • As reported costs were within Best Practices report cost model range for system best practice costs • ODRP tonnes, costs & revenues deducted for 2008 & 2009 funding

  6. Historical BB System Costs 3) Adjusted to exclude wine and spirits containers under deposit. For 2007 & 2008, LCBO contributed $5 m less steward obligation for non-deposit Blue Box materials to municipalities.

  7. BBPP Funding Calculation • Verified reported gross costs • Including amortized capital • Operating costs (except reported administration) • Plus • Calculated administration costs • Calculated interest on municipal capital costs • Equals • Total gross municipal BB system cost

  8. BBPP Funding • Total gross municipal BB system cost adjusted for • Prior year corrections • Results of municipal Blue Box audits • Corrections arising from WDO verification • Errors reported by municipalities • ODRP for 2007, 2008, 2009 funding • Less • 3 year rolling average revenue • Equals net system cost • Multiplied by 50% = industry obligation to municipalities

  9. BBPP Funding • Industry obligation to municipalities • Less CNA/OCNA in-kind contribution • Less CIF contribution = cash available for distribution

  10. Pending Changes to 2009 • LCBO $5 million annual contribution • Less steward obligation on non-deposit materials • Remaining funds distributed to municipalities • In 2007 & 2008; does not continue into 2009 • LCBO not exempted as Blue Box steward for deposit wine & spirits containers by regulation • Stewardship Ontario notified LCBO of obligation under BBPP in 2009 • As part of annual notification process • Including wine & spirits containers as not exempted

  11. Pending Changes to 2009 • Stewards must report by March 31 • If LCBO submits report re ODRP data • 2009 municipal funding will be adjusted

  12. MIPC’s Actions • MIPC’s actions re commodity markets • Clarified with MOE that composting of paper fibres considered diversion • Liaised with SO re eligible BB system costs to include • Stockpiling costs • Composting costs

  13. MIPC’s Actions • Arranged for correspondence from WDO, SO & AMO to Mayors/Members of Council dated January 22 • take every opportunity to market materials to recycling markets, even at reduced revenues • where marketing materials, even at reduced revenues, is not an available option • market materials to recycling markets that charge a tip fee, making every effort to minimize tip fees paid

  14. MIPC’s Actions • Arranged for correspondence from WDO, SO & AMO to Mayors/Members of Council dated January 22 (continued) • for paper fibres • where it is not feasible to market materials even at reduced revenues or tip fees • direct materials to permitted composting facilities • where composting facilities are operated by municipalities • make every effort to market the resulting compost for revenue

  15. MIPC’s Actions • Arranged for correspondence from WDO, SO & AMO to Mayors/Members of Council dated January 22 (continued) • for non-paper materials • where it is not feasible to market materials even at reduced revenues or tip fees • hold materials pending increased market demand

  16. Changes to 2008 Datacall • Able to report • Quantity stockpiled • All materials not just glass & plastics • Quantity disposed • Not processing residue

  17. Changes to 2008 Datacall • Stockpiling costs • Report under Blue Box Costs Processing tab • Under ‘Deduction of Stockpiling Cost’ as • Warehousing & transport costs for stockpiled materials • Stockpiled costs deducted in 2008 • Will be added in 2009 if materials marketed • Disposal costs • Not eligible • Do not report in Blue Box Financial Datacall

  18. Changes to 2008 Datacall • Able to report market tip fees paid • Added to Section 6.2 costs

  19. WEEE Contacting WDO Email Executive Director glendagies@wdo.ca Datacall Datacall@wdo.ca MHSW Report MHSWReport@wdo.ca BBPP Review BBPPReview@wdo.ca Telephone 416 226 5113 Fax 416 226 1368 Website www.wdo.ca

More Related