1 / 27

Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies

A presentation by Peter Bishop, in partial fulfillment for course Education 6610: Research in Computers in the Curriculum. Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies. Methods. Findings. Web 2.0 As Formative Assessment. Self-Assessment Using Web 2.0.

yetta-whitehead
Download Presentation

Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A presentation by Peter Bishop, in partial fulfillment for course Education 6610: Research in Computers in the Curriculum Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies

  2. Methods

  3. Findings

  4. Web 2.0 As Formative Assessment

  5. Self-Assessment Using Web 2.0

  6. Use of rubrics to assess student learning when using web 2.0

  7. Discussion

  8. Conclusion

  9. Implications

  10. Limitations

  11. References

  12. 1.Abendroth, M., Golzy, J, B., O’Connor, E., A.(2011). Self-Cceated youtube recordings of microteachings: Their effects upon candidates' readiness for teaching and instructors' assessment. Journal of Educational Technological Systems.40(2). 141-159.   2.Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers and Education, 59(3), 855-860. doi:10.1016/j.compedu2012.04.008

  13. 3.Barwell, G. Moore, C. Walker, R., (2011). Marking machinima: A case study in assessing student use of a web 2.0 technology. Australasian Journal of Education Technology. 27(5), 765-780. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au. 4.Chang, C., & Tseng K. (2009). Use and performances fo Web-based portfolio assessment. British journal of Educational Technology. 40(2). 358-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00885.x

  14. 5.Chang, C. C., & Wu, B.H. (2012). Is teacher assessment reliable or valid for high school students under a web-based portfolio environment? Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 265–278. Retrieved from: http://www.ifets.info 6.Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1),179-183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x

  15. 7.Griffith, S. (2009). Assessing student participation in an online graduate course. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 6(4), 35-44. Retrieved from: http://www.itdl.org/ 8.Lai, Yiu Chi and Ng, Eugenia M.W. (2011). Using Wikis to develop student teachers’ learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities. Internet and Higher Education. 14(1),15-26. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.06.001

  16. 9.Terrel, J., Richardson, J., Hamilton M. (2011). Using web 2.0 to teach web 2.0: A case study in aligning teaching, learning and assessment with professional practice. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 27(5), 846-862. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au. 10.Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L.., Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in web-bases learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.22(3), 207-217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x

More Related