360 likes | 655 Views
CDM PROSPECTS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES. Presented to DENR Workshop on CDM Climate Change Institute. By S. West Stewart, Managing Director Philippine Bio-Sciences Co., Inc. ‘PhilBIO’ November 4, 2003. CDM Prospects for Solid Waste Management Overview.
E N D
CDM PROSPECTS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES Presented to DENR Workshop on CDM Climate Change Institute By S. West Stewart, Managing Director Philippine Bio-Sciences Co., Inc. ‘PhilBIO’ November 4, 2003
CDM Prospects for Solid Waste Management Overview • Relative Size of MSW in the Philippines • Typical Ways to Extract LFG • Typical Ways to Upgrade & Utilize LFG • Payatas Demo Project Case Study • Basic Parameters for LFG CDM • LFG CDM Potential • The ‘Methane Kick’ Benefit
1. waste generation rate -What a Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia, World Bank, 1999 2. Urban population data - (http://apps.fao.org); Philippine Statistical Yearbook
GHG Emissions from the Waste Sector Source: Ms. Joy Goco, IACCC
AEROBIC TREATMENT ANAEROBIC TREATMENT 1.2 kg O 0.35 m 3 3 2 methane CO + H O CO + H O - 1 kWh - 1 kWh 2 2 2 2 + 12.9 MJ - 3.6 MJ - 3.6 MJ 1 kg BOD Air Air removed Biomass 0.6 Biomass 0.06 kg dry weight kg dry weight
Legend: 1- Leachate drainage system 2- Geosynthetics liner 3- Temporary soil cover 4- Compacted waste 5- Impermeable clay liner 6- Top soil layer 7- Flare 8- Pumping system 9- Surface water collection 10- Leachate treatment works Cross Section of Typical Landfill
PhilBIO’s RESTORE CONCEPT FOR MANAGED LANDFILL LEACHATE & METHANE GAS RECOVERY WITH ON SITE POWER GENERATION USING ANAEROBIC DIGESTER TECHNOLOGY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND HIGH SOLIDS
LFG UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY • Direct Gas Utilitization ~ Gas Pipeline to nearby industrial gas user (for boilers) • 118 Projects in the USA • .5 to 5 km Gas Pipelines • Electric Power Generation • Internal Combustion Engines ~ 500 kW -3 mW • Gas Turbines ~ 3 mW to 50 mW • Nearly 1,000 Projects in the USA with installed based of 900 mW • Microturbines (Lopez Canyon, California) • In the future, Fuel Cells • Vehicular Fuel • Leachate Evaporation
N2O SO2 CH4 CO Furans NOX Dioxins H2S CO2 leachate groundwater Source: Climate Change Institute
Case Study: Payatas DumpsiteWaste Stream Composition PNOC/EC from “Payatas Extraction Project”
PAYATAS DUMPSITEGAS COMPOSITION PNOC/EC, ibid.
LFG PROJECT REQUIREMENTS • INVESTMENT COSTS – LFG RECOVERY • Assuming electric power generation option (US$/rated kW) PNOC/EC, ibid.
LFG PROJECT REQUIREMENTS • INSTITUTIONAL – LFG RECOVERY • Legal ~ Project Itself is R.A.9003 Compliant • LGU ~ Meets Local Requirements for Solid Waste Management • Social ~ Community Outreach • Constant Interaction on Merits of Project • Local Barangay Approvals • Public Participation Forum & Comment Period • Avoid NIMBY ~ Example, Gapan, Nueva Ecija • Contracts ~ PPA, Gas Offtake Agreement, Waste Stream Conveyance Contracts • Carbon Ownership
LFG Prospects for the Philippines • Standard Adaptation of Developed Country Technologies will rarely be economical without • Tipping Fees to sustain landfill development • Use of plastics for containment • Coverage & Compaction of waste • An appropriate Operations & Maintenance Budget, and • ERPA Contract(s)
LFG Prospects for the Philippines • LFG Prospects Improve Substantially with CDM Status
CDM: Monetizing Carbon Credits Increases Project IRR’s
The Economics of waste to energy projects are especially attractive Jamaica Wind Farm Project 20 MW installed capacity 50,000 t CO2 ER’s p.a.(10 years) Project costs: US$20m (+) Carbon value: @ $3/ t CO2 = $1.72m @ $5/ t CO2 = $2.87m Proportion of project costs: @ $3/ t CO2 = 8.6% @ $5/ t CO2 = 14.35% PhilBIO’s CAT Waste to Energy Project 2 MW installed capacity >50,000 t CO2 ER’s p.a.(10 years) Project costs: US$3.5m Carbon value: @$3 /t CO2 = $1.72m @$5 /t CO2 = $2.87m Proportion of project costs: @ $3/ t CO2 = 49.1% @ $5/ t CO2 = 82.0%
Fugitive Methane Achieves Greatest Carbon Potential • Generate more CERs in proportion to installed assets • Due to GWP of methane being 21 – i.e. 1 tonne of methane released has warming effect of 21 tonnes of CO2 • 1 MW of baseload power (8000 hrs/yr) can earn 25,000 to 40,000 CERs per year when powered by fugitive CH4 • US$75k to US$200k per MW capacity per year • Barriers . . . Globally, a limited number of projects > 20 MW • Most < 5 MW (In Philippines only a handful of projects are this large!) • As scales decreases – cost of carbon trading increases • High degree of stakeholder and bureaucratic obstacles • Low hanging fruit – all types of landfills – are politically charged • Converting all major Manila based ‘dumps’ into controlled or managed landfills ~ the most obvious of the ‘fruit’
Fugitive Methane Philippines Greatest Carbon Potential • Job 1: Converting all major Manila based ‘dumps’ into controlled or managed landfills ~ the most obvious of the ‘ low hanging fruit’ • Convert Payatas & Vitas to Managed Dumpsite • Convert Montalban Sanitary Landfill for LFG Capture • Energy Potential: from 5,000 tons per day of waste • If 100% for electric power generation: > 50 mW Power plants • At >80,000 operating hours • Or with Carbon Potential of > 15,000,000 Ers • With Current Value ($3) of $45,000,000 (7 Year Crediting Period) • With CDM, the NCR Waste Management Crisis and its solutions become more realistic. • For Provincial Areas, compacted waste transported to Regional SLF with LFG or Waste to Energy Facilities • General Santos SLF with PhilBIO/BTA WTE, • At least 15 Major LFG or WTE Projects can be sited in the Philippines that would have significant economies of scale and attract investment. • Cebu, Davao, GenSan, Zamboanga, CDO, Ilo Ilo, Bacolod, Legazpi, Naga, Tacloban, Tagbilaran, Batangas, Urdaneta, San Fernando (2)
CERs Improve Debt Service Coverage • Sale of CERs involve minimal costs • This cash flow can be readily applied to Debt Service • Direct Payments on Annual Debt Service Requirements • Funding Debt Service Reserve Accounts • Using Forward EPRA Sales as Collateral • Funding an Account to supplement variations in EBITDA • Applying Carbon Cash Flow to Debt Service Can Result in more favorable Capital Structures • Higher DSCR (More Debt Carrying Capacity) means less Equity Requirement – Thereby Increasing ROE • Allows Project to be Financed Because Increases DSCR past Predetermined Threshold set by the Lender • Either Way, Both Project Developer and Project Lender are Better Off.
A Wind Project Example • Example Assumption: • US$82m Capital Outlay 300GWh • 75% EBITDA Margins 0.7 tCO2e/MWh Coefficient • $4 Price per CER D/E of 50% • $40 Price per MWh 15 yr Term, 7% interest Rate • CER Cash Flow Can Increase DSCR by up to 0.2, or roughly $4m (10%) in additional debt carrying capacity. • If CER price is increased to $8 (current forecasts are between $8-$12 in 5 years) this could mean up to $8m LESS equity investment – a full 20% reduction. • At price of $4 – CER sales represent 19% of annual debt service • At price of $8 – CER sales represent 37% of annual debt service • In methane (CH4) projects these benefits are significantly enhanced
Debt Service Coverage Ratio Matrix for a Wind Project Extra Debt Capacity
A Fugitive Methane Project Example BLUE Indicates Extra Debt Capacity
CDM Prospects for LFG Projects • IF PROJECTS MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA • AT LEAST 10 YEAR LIFE OR CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT • AT LEAST 1 MM TONS OF CAPACITY • AT LEAST 500 TPD INPUT • THEN, • GWP OF 21 TIMES CARBON DIOXIDE • ADDS UP TO 40,000 MTCE PER ANNUM • OR UP TO U.S.$200 PER RATED KW • WITH SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED DEBT CAPACITY ~ UP TO 100% DEBT • FINALLY, PAYATAS EXAMPLE…
Achievable… Based on a similar LFG Project
PhilBIO: SWM Track Record • 1995: Feasibility Study for Ayala Alabang Village Association & City of Muntinlupa • 1998:PhilBIO incorporated by PEI, U.S. Green Fund & U.S. Project Developer • 2 Years:Waste-to-Energy Project Feasibility Studies for Baguio and Talisay, Negros Occ. (Also in Thailand, Bangkok and Chiang Mai) • 2001:Rocky Farm CIGAR Project ~ 8 Farms with CIGAR • 2001:1st To do a Carbon Assessment & Validation -- CAT – 1st to receive ‘Letter of No Regrets’ from IACCC • 2002:1st To Execute Contract for City Waste to Energy Project-- General Santos City WTE Project • 3/2003: 1st to Execute a PDD for a City Waste to Energy Project-General Santos City WTE Project (Pending Additional Data) • 11/2003:1st to Execute Contract for Landfill Gas Project -- Payatas 100 kW LFG Project
PhilBIO: Team/Resources • S. West Stewart, Managing Director • U.S. Investment Banking & Project Finance • More than 20 years of experience in Japan and other parts of Asia, 6 years of project experience in Philippines. • David A. Donnelly, Director • U.S. Investment Banking and Environmental Engineering Capability • More than 12 years of Asian business experience, currently General Manager, CleanTHAI, Bangkok • Dr. Marc Stuart, Mr. Justin Guest, EcoSecurities, Ltd. • Premier Carbon Global Financing Team • Financed Largest CDM LFG Project (NovaGenar, Brasil)
PhilBIO: Local Team Resources • PhilBIO Team • Roberto C. Julian • Philippine Investment Banking, Insurance and Renewable Energy/Energy Efficiency Financing Expert • Ricky Beltran • Staff Economist • Philippine Project Development and Management Expert • Alberto Pascua • Philippine Engineering Water and Anaerobic Digester Design Expert • PhilBIO Construction Inc.~ Plastics, Geo-synthetic welding, seaming and installation & electric power plant installation.
Philippine Bio-Sciences Suite 1703 Centerpoint Dona Julia Vargas Ave Ortigas Center Pasig City (02) 631-2745 (02) 635-9686 Philbio@pei.net.ph