170 likes | 257 Views
What was unique about the British colonial experience that laid the foundations for revolution?. Its Ideological Origins. Typical Interpretation: British revenue acts and American resistance. Sugar Act, 1764 Stamp Act, 1765 Stamp Act Congress and Boycotts Townshend Duties, 1767, and Boycotts
E N D
What was unique about the British colonial experience that laid the foundations for revolution? Its Ideological Origins
Typical Interpretation:British revenue acts and American resistance • Sugar Act, 1764 • Stamp Act, 1765 • Stamp Act Congress and Boycotts • Townshend Duties, 1767, and Boycotts • Boston Massacre, 1770 • Tea Act, 1773 • Boston Tea Party, 1774 • Coercive Acts, 1774 • 1st Continental Congress, 1774 • Battle at Lexington and Concord, April 1775
But why are these acts so incendiary? Why do Americans respond differently? • Old Interpretation: a conflict between virtuous American people and: • Inept British Empire • Tyrannical British Empire
Why ARE these acts so incendiary FOR AMERICANS? New Interpretation: Ideology
New appreciation for ideological causes of historical events • More benign meaning to “ideology” – a mentality • Contemporary history –Cold War ideological conflicts • Social science influence: anthropology and cultural meaning
Shared British-American ideology • British constitution sacred – key to liberty • Constitution not codified; accumulated precedent
British Constitution: mixed Government Montesquieu, 1748
British Constitution: mixed Government Montequieu, 1748 – Unprecedented stability and harmony
REAL reasons for British stability and harmony • 1. Controversial issues all settled • King governs according to Parliamentary statutes • Will not levy taxes or wage war without consent • No standing army in peacetime
REAL reasons for British stability and harmony • 2. Day to day harmony ensured: • Crown exercise of “influence” over elections • Crown distribution of patronage
Criticism of British system of influence and patronage:Radical Whigs/CommonwealthmenJohn Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, 1720-23
Criticism of British system of influence and patronage: RADICAL WHIG IDEOLOGY BIG IDEAS: • Power Threatens Liberty • Liberty: Ability to exercise natural rights in limits set by law • Power: Compulsion “absolute power corrupts, absolutely” • The People MUST be Vigilant Against Corruption and Tyranny
Radical Whig Thought Appeals to: AMERICAN COLONIES • American Constitution Mimics British
American Differences from British Political System:Power of Executive • 1. On surface, more power: • Veto Power • Can convene and dissolve Assembly at will • Judiciary powers
American Differences from the British System:Power of the Executive • But in practice, less control . . . • Responsible to external executive: Board of Trade • Little “influence” over elections Reduced ability to distribute patronage Assemblies appoint sheriffs, approve judges, appoint colonial treasurer
American Differences: Assemblies not Manageable • Representation more egalitarian 50-75% of white men meet property qualifications to vote • Leadership less settled Instructions given to representatives • Idea of direct representation evolves
Thus, Through American eyes . . . • Governors too powerful • British system corrupt • Radical whig warnings make sense . . .