170 likes | 312 Views
Best Practices In Design Outcomes Of A Survey. P. H. King, PhD, PE Joan Walker, PhD Vanderbilt University. Design Survey, 13 respondents, late 2003. How many credit hours & terms – design course Which measures are required, as needed, not needed Grading examples?
E N D
Best Practices In DesignOutcomes Of A Survey P. H. King, PhD, PEJoan Walker, PhDVanderbilt University
Design Survey, 13 respondents, late 2003 • How many credit hours & terms – design course • Which measures are required, as needed, not needed • Grading examples? • Suggested additions re ABET & design?
Course Structure: Credits • 3 + 3 5 programs • 3 3 programs • 2 + 3 1 program • 2 + 2 1 program • 1 + 2 1 program • 3 to 6 1 program (variable credit) • 8 1 program (over 6 terms)
Final Written Paper Periodic Written Reports Periodic Oral Reports Prototype Project Notebook Final Oral Presentation Health & Safety Analysis Final Poster Presentation 13, 0, 0 13, 0, 0 11, 2, 0 9, 2, 2 9, 1, 3 8, 1, 4 8, 4, 1 8, 1, 4 Topics: Rank ordered Columns are: Required, As needed, Not Required
Order of Magnitude Calc. Societal Impact Market/Econ. Analysis Design History File Ethical Concerns Grant Proposal Patent Application Manufacturability 7, 1, 5 6, 3, 4 6, 3, 4 6, 1, 6 5, 6, 2 4, 3, 6 3, 4, 6 3, 4, 6 Topics: Rank ordered, Continued Columns are: Required, As needed, Not Required
Cite Relevant Standards Sustainability Environmental Impact Political Considerations 2, 8, 3 1, 3, 9 0, 9, 4 0, 3, 10 Topics: Rank ordered, Continued Columns are: Required, As needed, Not Required
Suggested Additions to List • Manuscript ready for journal publication • K-12 outreach presentation of project • Proof of concept prior to design • Aesthetic considerations • Timeline • System Specification • Peer review
Suggested Additions To List (If ABET) • Teamwork & Leadership (2) • Peer & Self Evaluations • Design Controls • Engineering Analysis (FEM) • Innovation • Quality Controls • Design of Experiments
Grading Schemes Collected: • Course Grading Scheme 7 • Peer Review 2 • Design Notebook 1 • Oral Report 1 • Design Report 2 • Poster Judging 1 • Proposal Grading 1
Oral Grading Sheet - Marquette Presentation Skills/Organization: (30 pts) Were members of group professional in appearance? 5 points Were speakers adequately prepared for presentation and questions? 10 pts Was presentation clear and understandable? 10 pts Were visual aids sufficient in numbers and properly used? 5 pts Technical Content of Presentation: (30 pts) Did group demonstrate sufficient technical understanding and base concept(s) on sound engineering principles? 15 pts Did prototype/key deliverable adequately communicate proposed concept? 15 pts
Oral Grading Sheet Continued Salability: (40 pts) Was audience convinced that: proposed concept will meet customer needs? _______(15) proposed concept is technically feasible? _______(10) proposed concept is economically viable? _______(10) group can complete project by May 2004? _______(5) TOTAL _______(100) + comments to speaker … + comments to course coordinator …
Other sources • TIDEE – transferable integrated design engineering education - http://www.tidee.cea.wsu.edu/assessment-tools/design-processes.html • BESTEAMS – building engineering student team effectiveness and management systems - http://www.enme.umd.edu/labs/BESTEAMS/
Material Solicited • Please send to paul.h.king@vanderbilt.edu • Material will be posted on VaNTH website: http://vubme.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/King/design_education.htm in the near future
Thank You! Questions or Comments? This work is supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9876363