30 likes | 120 Views
Is BPM the killer app for agents?. No Why not? Business reasons: BPM is already being done by IBM, Microsoft, BEA, Oracle, and a host of other small/mid/large enterprise SW vendors Agents provide little new end-functionality – at most “minor” architectural improvements
E N D
Is BPM the killer app for agents? • No • Why not? • Business reasons: BPM is already being done by IBM, Microsoft, BEA, Oracle, and a host of other small/mid/large enterprise SW vendors • Agents provide little new end-functionality – at most “minor” architectural improvements • But, there’s a potential niche opportunity for agents in BPM • Off-line participation in business processes with seamless reconnectivity to BPM server when on-line • Better: ad-hoc BPM where servers infeasible (construction sites, tractors)
Issues • BPM Challenges & pitfalls • Current approaches have highly static architecture & interfaces (despite promise of web services) • Agents bring • (almost) zero configuration enables highly dynamic (possibly even adaptive) architectures • Low cost scalability • Centralized control not a fundamental problem • However, the agent improvements are not sufficient to counter the established vendors (from business point of view) • Established markets • Established (centralized) architectures
The Killer App is… • I don’t know • But characteristics will be: • Something ONLY an agent-oriented approach can achieve • Complex, rapidly changing environment • Driven by “business” – not technology • In the meantime • BPM definitely provides good application & research area for agents