1 / 23

Fluka simulations for secondary ion beams

Fluka simulations for secondary ion beams. Chrysostomos Valderanis Ilias Efthymiopoulos. Two parallel approaches in building the simulation. Full geometry Includes all active and passive elements of the beam line Tracking is handled by Fluka transport To be used in the future

york
Download Presentation

Fluka simulations for secondary ion beams

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fluka simulations for secondary ion beams ChrysostomosValderanis IliasEfthymiopoulos

  2. Two parallel approaches in building the simulation • Full geometry • Includes all active and passive elements of the beam line • Tracking is handled by Fluka transport • To be used in the future • Toy montecarlo • Includes target and degrader • Magnetic rigidity selection in an algorithm • To be used for rate predictions C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  3. C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  4. T2 target and first bends (H – plane) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  5. The double spectrometer (V – plane) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  6. Last bends and quads upstream to NA61 C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  7. Summary – I : Full geometry • Dipoles, quadruples, collimators • In working condition • Missing elements • Target and degrader • Beam instrumentation • Beam pipe C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  8. Toy montecarlo : Geometry Target Degrader Pb ions Measurments Rigidity selection C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  9. Toy montecarlo : Datasets • [beam] x [target] x [degrader] • [30GeV A] x [4cm C, 40cm Be, 4cm Pb] • [13Gev A] x [4cm C] x [2cm C] C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  10. Light ion fragments. Which one? • Radionuclides 3≤Z ≤7, 6≤A ≤15, T1/2≥10-6s C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  11. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target (2*106) T2 target 4cm C C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  12. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target (2*106) T2 target 4cm C C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  13. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106) T2 target 4cm C All ions (5,11) Bρ=3.33P/Z C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  14. Ion fragment purity at T2 target • Results for 2 × 106Pb ions on target • 500x for maximum expected beam intensity from SPS (1× 109) • T2 target = 4cm C C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  15. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C All ions (6,11) (5,11) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  16. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106) T2 target 40cm Be C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  17. 30GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 40cm Be All ions (6,11) (5,11) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  18. Ion fragment purity at T2 target for 30GeV A Pb ions • Results for 2 × 106Pb ions on target Factor : 500 for maximum expected beam intensity from SPS (1× 109) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  19. 13GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  20. 13GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C,selection (6,11) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  21. 13GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C,selection (6,11) C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  22. 13GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C,selection (6,11),2cm degrader C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

  23. 13GeV A Pb ions at T2 target(2*106)T2 target 4cm C,selection (6,11),2cm degrader C. Valderanis, I.Efthymiopoulos

More Related