1 / 8

Intervention outcomes for male DV offenders

Intervention outcomes for male DV offenders. Preliminary Data Gilbert MacVaugh and Alan Rosenbaum (Unpublished). Demographics. N= 1,150 male DV offenders (Based on all 1999 DV arrests for whom data were available in Worcester District Court Age: Mean= 32.09 Years (S.D.= 9.65)

Download Presentation

Intervention outcomes for male DV offenders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intervention outcomes for male DV offenders Preliminary Data Gilbert MacVaugh and Alan Rosenbaum (Unpublished)

  2. Demographics • N= 1,150 male DV offenders (Based on all 1999 DV arrests for whom data were available in Worcester District Court • Age: Mean= 32.09 Years (S.D.= 9.65) • Race: 54% Caucasian, 19% AF-AM, 24% Hispanic, 4% Asian-AM, 2.4% Unknown origin • Included Offenses: A&B, A&B w/ dangerous weapon, Violation of restraining order, Criminal threatening (All against female partner).

  3. Criminal Justice System Response • Arrest Only: n=540 (24.8%) • Probation: n=133 (11.5%) • Incarceration: n=164 (14.2%) • Anger Management: n= 91 (7.9%) • Certified BIP: n=74 (6.4%) • Substance Abuse Eval or Tx: n=28 (2.4%) • Other Counseling: n=19 (1.6%) • Treatment non-completers: n=106 (9.1%)

  4. Recidivism • Overall Re-offense rate: 40% ( Between 1999 and 2004) • Type of re-offense • DV- 18% • Non DV- 15% • DV plus Non-DV- 23%

  5. Recidivism • Compared to the criminal justice intervention only (arrest, incarceration, etc.), offenders having any type of treatment had significantly lower rates of recidivism (31.5% vs. 41.6%) and • Fewer number of re-offenses (0.46 compared to 0.79).

  6. Recidivism by disposition • Arrest only 33.2% • Probation only 36.1% • Incarceration 56.7% • Anger Management 22.0% • Certified BIP 35.1% • Substance abuse Tx only 42.9% • Counseling unspecified 47.4% • Treatment non-completers 67.6%

  7. Mean number of re-offenses by 2004 by intervention

  8. Mean Number of Months to Re-offense by intervention

More Related