1 / 18

International Commercial Dispute Resolution --- By SUN WEN JIE

International Commercial Dispute Resolution --- By SUN WEN JIE. Lehman, Lee & Xu 雷曼律师事务所 www.lehmanlaw.com May 12, 2006. Conceptual Analysis. I nternational vs. Domestic C ommercial vs. Non-commercial D ispute vs. Claim R esolution vs. Waiver. Alternatives for ICDR. Settlement

yuki
Download Presentation

International Commercial Dispute Resolution --- By SUN WEN JIE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Commercial Dispute Resolution--- By SUN WEN JIE Lehman, Lee & Xu雷曼律师事务所 www.lehmanlaw.com May 12, 2006

  2. Conceptual Analysis • International vs. Domestic • Commercial vs. Non-commercial • Dispute vs. Claim • Resolution vs. Waiver

  3. Alternatives for ICDR • Settlement • Referral to expert • Mediation • Arbitration • Litigation • Any others?

  4. Comparison On Alternatives • Cost – benefit analysis • Advantages and disadvantages • Required in certain circumstances • Binding vs. non-binding

  5. Process of Dispute Management • Introduction & instruction from Client • Analysis • Communication & correspondences • Negotiation • Settlement or legal action

  6. Strategies & Skills in the Process 1. Introduction & instruction from Client Key points: • What you heard from your client may not be true • Never start an action without authorization from your client • Grasp key elements in the story

  7. 2. Analysis Key points • Facts • Laws • Commercial Perspective

  8. 3. Communication & correspondences Key points • 5 W (who, whom, what, when, how) • Anticipate response • Start with the end in mind • Without prejudice • Confirm any oral agreement in writing • Collect evidence • Time limit in contract

  9. 4. Negotiation Key points • Stand in the other’s shoes • Inner negotiation: Don not fear of persuading your client to compromise • Not necessary to win • Keep things in control • Friendly but aggressive

  10. 5. Settlement Key points • A new agreement • Pre-action or post-action • Win-win situation: time, money, relationship • Key elements in Settlement Agreement: consideration, release of rights, no admission, confidentiality • Key consideration in Settlement Agreement: unilateral or mutual; whether covers all parties; whether covers all claims

  11. Arbitration vs. Litigation • Why arbitration most acceptable ? • Independency • Flexibility • Confidentially • Enforceability • Party autonomy

  12. Process Management for Arbitration/Litigation (1) Draft of arbitration agreement: • Venue • Appointment of arbitrator • Language • Procedure • Place • Rules • Final and binding

  13. Process Management for Arbitration/Litigation (2) Preparation for hearing • All facts must be evidenced • Classify evidences: • Supporting evidences vs. Opposing evidences • Relevant vs. Irrelevant • Available vs. Unavailable • Assess your opponent’s evidences • Claim/counterclaim vs. counter defense/defense • Prepare to use opponent’s evidence to support your argument • Simplify facts

  14. Process Management for Arbitration/Litigation (3) Presentation in hearing • Written arguments and oral argument • Confirm oral argument in writing • Focus on focus (not to go farer than your preparation) • Always know your audience

  15. Some Golden Notes • Evidences will never be sufficient • Familiar with in-hand evidences • Keep thinking opponent’s response • Don’t submit an evidence until you know how to use it • Are evidences logically connected? • A good fact is more important than good law

  16. Parties: US Buyer Buyer’s employee Manufacturer Freight forwarder Shipping company Consignee Chart 1 Case Study 1 Buyer Consignee Shipping Co. Employee Forwarder Manufacturer

  17. Background of Case 1 • US Buyer made a purchase order to Manufacture through its Employee in China • Buyer used Forwarder as agent to ship goods to Consignee in New York • Forwarder on-loaded goods on a vessel of Shipping Co. • Employee took B/L from Forward after shipment by cheating and refused to send out the B/L • Employee said that Buyer owed payment to him as well as Manufacturer • Goods was on the ocean • You are representing US Buyer now

  18. Background A US Distributor signed an exclusive distribution agreement with a Chinese Supplier There is a Sales Projection in the Agreement Based on the Projection Supplier built up workshops, hired employees, bought equipments and materials D failed to meet the Projection Supplier claimed D for multi-million compensation Chart 2 Case Study 2 US Distributor China Supplier

More Related