1 / 17

New Programming Arrangements 2010-2014

New Programming Arrangements 2010-2014 . UNDP Lebanon. New Principles. No more “execution” or “designated institution”: Only “implementation” and “responsible party” Everything is “National Execution” (CDR signs the CPAP) CPAP/AWP: Replaces the “project” in SBAA

yuri
Download Presentation

New Programming Arrangements 2010-2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Programming Arrangements2010-2014 UNDP Lebanon

  2. New Principles • No more “execution” or “designated institution”: Only “implementation” and “responsible party” • Everything is “National Execution” • (CDR signs the CPAP) • CPAP/AWP: Replaces the “project” in SBAA • Only one type of approach, harmonized: HACT • Four modalities in HACT: • Advances • Reimbursement • Direct Payment • Direct Implementation NIM: National Implementation DIM: Direct Implementation

  3. Three Programming Tools 1/3 CPD: Country Programme Document • Approved by Executive Board for full cycle 2010-2014 • Linked to agreed UNDAF outcomes • CPD contains the UNDP-specific outcomes • CPD outcomes are fixed for 2010-2014 unless agree with CDR+IPs that major reorientation of country programme needed • Few details on outputs, activities, or arrangements • UNDP Lebanon: Nine Outcomes…

  4. UNDP Lebanon: 9 Outcomes • Performance of public institutions enhanced; public administration modernized • Accountability of state institutions, and inclusive participation, strengthened • Strengthened policy and institutional framework for implementing strategies focused on poverty reduction • Local governance structures in target under-served regions strengthened for better representation, participation, and basic local services delivery • Environmental considerations mainstreamed • Government equipped for obligations set by int’l conventions • Climate change considerations mainstreamed in national priorities • Government capacities to address critical recovery issues improved • Living conditions and trust in Palestinian and Lebanese surrounding communities improved

  5. Three Programming Tools 2/3 CPAP Country Programme Action Plan • Approved by UNDP & CDR by December/January 2010, following approval by IPs of new AWPs • Most important is the Results & Resources Framework, outlining outcomes, outputs, and resource targets for 2010-2014 • If new outputs or IPs, must seek approval from CDR before new AWP is signed • Annual Review to be conducted • Integrate findings of UNICEF/UNFPA/UNDP Stakeholder Analysis

  6. Three Programming Tools 3/3 Annual Work Plan • Is the legal agreement between UNDP and the IP • Required to initiate expenditures • Only one IP per AWP • Can have more than one AWP per IP • Can have the same output in various AWPs • Partners who are not IPs but who are contributing are “responsible parties”, and included in AWP • Year end: Prepare Annual Project Report (APR) for use by CPAP Annual Review

  7. Benefits • No long project documents and narratives • Narration and details only as necessary as per donor, not UNDP, requirements • Results reporting online using eRBM & ATLAS • CPAP is a one-stop consultation tool for UNDP, CDR & partners

  8. Annual Work Plan Page 1/2

  9. Annual Work Plan, Page 2/2

  10. Three Management Tools 1/3 • Country Programme Board • Outcome Board • Output Board/Project Steering Committee Board purpose/structure/participants to be discussed with CDR Sr. Management)

  11. Three Management Tools 2/3 Country Programme Board • Responsible for oversight of CPAP overall • Assess contribution to UNDAF outcomes • UNDP RR, CDR High-Level minimum • 1 x year meeting, prior to UNDAF Annual Review

  12. Three Management Tools 3/3 Outcome Board • Assess progress towards outcome and UNDP contribution towards UNDAF outcomes • UNDP, CDR, IPs, donors, experts, etc. • One Board per Outcome* • *(May combine depending on outcome, and use the UNDAF M&E Groups) • 2 x year meeting

  13. Management Processes Output Board/Project Steering Committee • Makes project management decisions and suggests changes to UNDP/IP • Executive, Sr. Supplier, Sr. Beneficiary (Members chosen at LPAC) • Based on AWPs, reviews and approves the quarterly plans • 4 x year meeting* • *For UNDP Lebanon, project meetings could coincide with the Quarterly Project Manager’s Meeting where updated AWPs could be approved

  14. eRBM & ATLAS Integration • AWP is less text on paper, transfer efforts to ATLAS & eRBM: • Outcome and output definitions • Indicators and targets • Risk logs • NY/HQ will develop global and regional reports based on data in the system • Decide on whether one award per outcome or one award per IP, TBD

  15. TBC: M & E, Audit • Annual Project Reviews (APRs) • Annual CPD Review (based on APRs) • UNDAF Evaluation 2013 (based on an Annual Reviews) • Annual audit of NIM partners

  16. TBC: Ambitions for 2010 We all manage for results and mobilize resources, but: • Programme Managers: Focus on resource mobilization, pipieline development, and outcome monitoring • POs: Focus on output management & monitoring and oversight of eRBM content • Project Managers: Focus on activity-level, regular updating of eRBM, requisitions • Results monitoring cross-portfolio and with other agencies • More implementation without DIM, including with NGOs

  17. Fin

More Related