1 / 50

April 2010

April 2010. Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety. Joe Darby Doug Dickinson Marsh Risk Consulting. Overview. CSA 2010 overview – Mark Langer Time Line for implementation What clients are telling us so far Initial Concerns

yves
Download Presentation

April 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. April 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Joe DarbyDoug DickinsonMarsh Risk Consulting

  2. Overview • CSA 2010 overview – Mark Langer • Time Line for implementation • What clients are telling us so far • Initial Concerns • What carriers should do to prepare • Wrap-up – Rich Bleser

  3. What is CSA 2010?

  4. Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 What is CSA 2010? CSA 2010 is a pro-active initiative to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of FMCSA’s enforcement and compliance program to achieve the Agency’s mission to reduce commercial motor vehicle (CMV) crashes, fatalities, and injuries.

  5. Why CSA 2010?

  6. Commercial Motor Vehicle Fatalities Rate of Commercial Motor Vehicle Fatalities is Leveling Off

  7. A More Agile, Efficient Program Current Operational Model Limitations Limited intervention tool-box for safety investigators (SIs) Safety fitness determination tied to compliance review Focus largely on carriers Limited number of federal/state investigators compared to large number of carriers FMCSA regulates ~725,000 interstate and foreign-based truck and bus companies U.S. DOT/FMCSA audit Compliance Review (CR) is labor intensive – Only able to reach < 2% (~12,000) of total carrier population annually

  8. What is Changing? The way FMCSA assesses carrier safety Identifies unsafe carrier and driver behaviors that lead to crashes Uses all safety-based roadside inspection violations Evaluates/tracks driver performance individually How FMCSA addresses carrier safety issues Reaches more carriers earlier and more frequently Improves efficiency of investigations Focuses on specific unsafe behaviors Identifies root causes Defines and requires corrective actions How FMCSA promotes safety Forces carriers/drivers to be accountable for their safety performance Demands and enforces safe on-road performance Makes more complete safety performance assessments publicly available

  9. A New Operational Model (Op-Model)

  10. CSA 2010 Op-Model New Safety Measurement System (SMS)Improved ability to identify demonstrated safety problems New intervention processEmploys an array of interventions instead of the single option, labor-intensive compliance review Proposed change for evaluation: new approach to the Safety Fitness Determination (SFD)SFD tied to current safety performance; not limited to acute/critical violations from a CR

  11. New Safety Measurement System (SMS) • Uses crash records and ALL roadside inspection safety-based violations to determine carrier/driver safety • Weights time and severity of violations based on relationship to crash risk • Triggers the intervention process Calculates safety performance based on 7 Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs) • Driver Safety Measurement System (DSMS) will be used to directly address commercial motor vehicle (CMV) driver performance in terms of BASICs, using available roadside performance data

  12. SMS BASICs SMS BASICs focus on behaviors linked to crashes • Unsafe Driving (Parts 392 & 397) • Fatigued Driving (Hours of Service; Parts 392 & 395) • Driver Fitness (Parts 383 & 391) • Controlled Substances/Alcohol (Parts 382 & 392) • Vehicle Maintenance (Parts 393 & 396) • Cargo Related (Parts 392, 393, 397 & HM) • Crash Indicator

  13. New Interventions Process The New Interventions Process addresses the… WHAT Discovering violations anddefining the problem (similar to current model), but also expanding to include the why and how WHY Identifying the cause or where the processes broke down HOWDetermining how to fix it/prevent it through use of Safety Management Cycle and Safety Improvement Resources

  14. New Intervention Tools • New intervention tools reach more carriers and influence safety compliance earlier • Warning Letters • Investigations • Offsite Investigations • Onsite Investigations - Focused • Onsite Investigations - Comprehensive • Follow-on corrective actions • Cooperative Safety Plan (CSP) • Notice of Violation (NOV) • Notice of Claim (NOC) • Operations Out-of-Service Order (OOS)

  15. Expansion from What to Why? Safety Management Cycle What safety management processes are breaking down? Why are these safety management processes breaking down?

  16. Safety Fitness Determination: Current Limitations • The current safety rating/SFD process has limitations • Only issued with on-site Compliance Review (resource intensive) • Only a snapshot of carrier compliance taken at the time of most recent CR • Safety ratings (Sat, Conditional or Unsat) are often outdated and may not reflect current safety posture • Heavily based on violations deemed “critical” or “acute” • Unsatisfactory/Unfit SFD rating requires multiple areas of deficiency

  17. Proposed Change to the SFD Process Incorporate on-road safety performance via new SMS on a monthly basis Continue to include major safety violations found as part of CSA 2010 investigations Produce a Safety Fitness Determination of Unfit or Marginal or Continue Operation Draft rulemaking is currently in review within FMCSA; NPRM is scheduled to be published Dec 2010.

  18. Benefits of CSA 2010 SFD Maximizes the use of data collected during roadside inspections Approx. 3 million inspections performed annually Creates carrier accountability for sustained unsafe operations and performance Assesses more carriers based on current safety performance CSA 2010 issues safety ratings within the existing regulatory framework. This will continue until the SFD rule goes into effect

  19. CSA 2010 Implementation

  20. National Implementation Summer 2010 Replace SafeStat with SMS Inspectors see BASICs information at the roadside July through December 2010 Roll out interventions tool box Send warning letters nationwide

  21. Time Line • SMS information available to carriers : April 12, 2010 • Live violation data available • Details of how BASICS are calculated: August 2010 • Prioritization of carriers begins: November 2010 • BASICS data live for all carriers • Safety Fitness Determination (SFD) Proposed Rule Making: December 2010 • Interventions begin on large scale: Spring 2011

  22. CSA 2010 Field Test

  23. Preliminary Results New Elements Warning letters are having a positive impact: About 4,000 sent to-date 45% of recipients logged in to view safety scores Feedback from test states indicates that carriers appreciate the early alert Carriers are using SMS results Some have logged in more than 200 times since the test started Anecdotally, they are using the data to drive safety improvements

  24. Impact on Industry Carrier Impacts More carriers will hear from FMCSA Specific safety performance information in SMS will be available All violations will count Warning letters will alert carriers of poor safety performance More carriers will be exposed to compliance and enforcement efforts

  25. Impact on Industry Driver Impacts Drivers will be able to examine their employers’ safety performance Deficient BASICs will be available to roadside inspectors Investigators will know an individual driver’s record across companies Investigators will pursue and penalize driver “red flag” violations

  26. Client Experience • Two DOT approaches • Education opportunity • Chance to reset expectations • Provide insights to how to be safer carrier • Carrot and Stick • Stand off • Letter listing demands • Consequences clearly outlined

  27. SMS Demonstration

  28. Carrier Measurement: SafeStat Results

  29. Carrier Measurement: SMS Results

  30. Violation Details Provided in SMS

  31. Further Drilldown in SMS

  32. How to get better in SMS? Good Inspections “Get Well” Rules Violation time weight diminishes | Webinar #2

  33. MN Trucking Association Initial Concerns

  34. Enforcement DataQ Peer Groupings Accessing the data Safety Fitness Determination Crash Indicator Inspection point values Hazardous Materials as separate basic Commercial Vehicle Drivers Summary FMCSA has agreed to some elements of the high lighted areas above – but continue to believe that the same data that was effective in reducing crashes with Safer will work with the BASICS

  35. Enforcement • Unequal enforcement (i.e. IN and OH) • Probable cause basis for stop • Warning ticket • Lower threshold • No recourse • Intent on counseling not enforcement • Inspection inaccuracies

  36. Peer groupings • Vehicle size only basis • Only 3 groups • No industry grouping (i.e. bus, van, LTL, flatbed, hazardous materials)

  37. Accessing the data • What data will be available to public • What driver data will be available to carriers • Data accuracy • Driver employment decisions based on warning tickets that cannot be challenged

  38. Crash indicator • All crashes • Includes non-preventable which carrier cannot impact • Carrier with only non-preventable crashes could look less safe than carrier with a smaller of crashes that are all preventable • Mileage not used to normalize the data

  39. Inspection point values • Relative weight of infractions • Improper transport of explosives = 2 points • Loose tie downs = 10 points • Not informing carrier of violation = 6 points • Not wearing glasses or hearing aid = 2 points • Steer tire and trailer tire have the same weight

  40. Drivers • Data from terminated drivers stay on carrier profile for 24 months • Carrier that hires same driver has a clean slate

  41. Actions to do to prepare

  42. What Can Carriers Do To Prepare Now?

  43. What Can Carriers Do To Prepare Now?

  44. Vigillo Aggregate Statistics 76% of Vigillo Customers have at least 1 BASIC over the Intervention Threshold (1200+ Fleets)

  45. What Can Carriers Do To Prepare Now? Learn more about CSA: http://csa2010.fmcsa.dot.gov Understand the BASICs Check the site for implementation schedule and listening session notice Sign up for latest news: RSS/listserv Check and update records Motor Carrier Census (Form MCS -150) Inspection and crash reports https://dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov/login.asp Ensure compliance Review inspections and violation history over the past 2 years Address safety problems now Educate drivers about how their performance impacts their own driving record and the safety assessment of the carrier

  46. What Can Carriers Do To Prepare Now? Register for pre-employment screening www.psp.fmcsa.dot.gov Use a private company to get a preview of the BASICs Vigillo and RAIR Technologies provides model of CSA 2010 Driver management features not in CSA test www.vigillo.com www.RAIR.com Mock FMCSA audit Fleet Group can provide

  47. Key Points for clients • Coming soon to all states • Unlike Safer – “good inspections” do not impact all elements of the BASICS (e.g. Unsafe Driving) • Register for Compass Portal now • https://portal.fmcsa.dot.gov • Review, understand, correct data • Take letter seriously • Safety rating can change without an audit • Individual driver performance will be visible • Hiring / retention implications

  48. Measure Identify Results Opportunity Monitor Safety Fitness Assess Current Fitness Measure and Mutually explore monitor performance the situation and form and continuously initial hypotheses of improve problem Commitment CRI CSA 2010 Execute/ Define the Process Identify Improvement Opportunities Implement Causes Incorporate Action Plan Mgmt. Process Solution Search for the Measurement Create and problem ’ s most manage likely cause(s); change refine and test the Design/Select Train Managers & Capacity hypothesis Best Solution Identify the “ best ” solution, the risks involved, and the commitment to change Wrap-Up • Game Changer • Regulations remain the same • Accountability measures are enhanced • Action Steps • Take Seriously • Assess Fitness • Identify Opportunities • Train • Incorporate Action Plan • Monitor Performance • Marsh Risk Consulting is at the fore-front • Contact us for assistance

  49. Questions For additional information go to:www.fmcsa.dot.gov/csa2010 For additional assistance contact your local Client Executive or the following: Rich Bleser – 414-290-4920 Doug Dickinson – 920-445-3814Joe Darby – 503-781-9821

  50. www.marsh.com

More Related