1 / 7

FCMAT REPORT SUMMARY Board of Education Meeting

FCMAT REPORT SUMMARY Board of Education Meeting. Vince Matthews, Interim State Administrator November 28, 2007. FCMAT Monitoring & OUSD Improvement Process. OUSD established process in October 2006 to proactively map activities to FCMAT standards and monitor progress against standards

zachery-andrews
Download Presentation

FCMAT REPORT SUMMARY Board of Education Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FCMAT REPORT SUMMARYBoard of Education Meeting Vince Matthews, Interim State Administrator November 28, 2007

  2. FCMAT Monitoring & OUSD Improvement Process • OUSD established process in October 2006 to proactively map activities to FCMAT standards and monitor progress against standards • Reported to Board of Education on efforts to improve performance for areas below an average score of 6.0: • Personal Management, 1/10/07 • Pupil Achievement, 2/14/07 • Financial Management, 11/29/06 • Facilities Management, 12/13/06 • FCMAT returned to audit operational areas again in September/October 2007

  3. Area 1: Community Relations & Governance The ratings of the standards in this operational area, as of the November 28, 2007 progress report, average 7.27 and all identified standards have scores of four or greater. The Superintendent of Public Instruction returned this operational area to the authority of the local Governing Board in a Memorandum of Understanding on July 9, 2007.

  4. Area 2: Personnel Management The ratings of the standards in this operational area, as of the November 28, 2007 progress report, average 6.60. None of the 25 standards has a score less than four. FCMAT recommends that the Superintendent of Public Instruction consider returning this operational area to the authority of the local Governing Board.

  5. Area 3: Pupil Achievement The ratings of the standards in this operational area, as of the November 28, 2007 progress report, average 5.87. None of the 30 standards has a score less than four. This operational area has not met the established criteria of an average of 6.0. However, FCMAT expects further progress, if curriculum plans are implemented as intended.

  6. Area 4: Financial Management The ratings of the standards in this operational area, as of the November 28, 2007 progress report, average 5.3. Two of the 30 standards have a score less than four.

  7. Area 5: Facilities Management The ratings of the standards in this operational area, as of the November 28, 2007 progress report, average 7.08. None of the 25 standards has a score less than four. FCMAT recommends that the Superintendent of Public Instruction consider returning this operational area to the authority of the local Governing Board.

More Related