200 likes | 292 Views
Journal Watch. Jeffrey P Schaefer, MD May 8, 2007. Today's Article. This article is ‘overwhelming’ !!!. Background. we believe that body organs respond to emotional state asthma patients may experience ‘stress-associated breathlessness’ without increased airway obstruction
E N D
Journal Watch Jeffrey P Schaefer, MD May 8, 2007
Background • we believe that body organs respond to emotional state • asthma patients may experience ‘stress-associated breathlessness’ without increased airway obstruction • mental state may alter measurements of breathing
Objectives • strained breathing may trigger breathlessness in asthma patients • asthma patents will feel more breathless with the same breathing pattern or with a stress induced breathing pattern
Methods • ‘Study of Harm’ • normals: exposure ? ‘disease’ • asthma: exposure ? ‘disease’ • Exposure arithmetic task • Disease altered breathing • breathlessness
Patients • Well Children 9-13 years (7) • Children with Asthma 9-14 yr (8) • stable disease and free of infx x 1 mo • FEV1 > 70% of predicted • continue inhaled corticosteroid • STOP bronchodilator x 24 hr • informed consent
Measurements • magnetometer respiration band • electromyography electrodes • Borg breathlessness scale
Timing of Resp Muscle Activity • Phase Angle • maximum EMG should occur at maximum chest expansion • at baseline: • asthmatic children • reduce EMG activity earlier in inspiration • tend to have abdominal strain in inspiration whereas normal have abdominal strain in expiration • these effects diminish during arithmetic (distracted)
‘phase reversal’ with math*A & B* chest expansionC & D* frontal diaphragm EMG
Author’s remarks • asthmatic children tend to ‘control their breathing’ possibly to reduce turbulent airflow / irritation • breathing became ‘closer to normal’ during arithmetic • WHY? • distraction probably not • interaction between CNS and breathing in the setting of disability?
Are the results of the study valid? • comparison groups similar except for factor under consideration? • similar measurements in both groups? • follow-up sufficient? • temporal relationship correct? • dose response gradient? • What are the results? • association between exposure and outcome? • precision of risk estimate? • Will the results help me in caring for my patients? • applicable to my practice? • magnitude of the risk? • stop the exposure?