350 likes | 382 Views
2001 Cost Optimization program. Charles Coker, Jr., Staff Vice President - Purchasing and Logistics. Why Do They Do It?. increasing competitive pressure slowing growth need it faster. The Sonoco Difference. with others, productivity burden is the supplier’s problem
E N D
2001 Cost Optimization program Charles Coker, Jr., Staff Vice President - Purchasing and Logistics
Why Do They Do It? • increasing competitive pressure • slowing growth • need it faster
The Sonoco Difference • with others, productivity burden is the supplier’s problem • to succeed, approach must be sustainable • Sonoco knows something about sustainability • Sonoco approach is different
Supply Chain Insights • competition is fierce • companies no longer compete one-on-one • old rules no longer apply • integrate and synchronize • waste and inefficiency must be eliminated
SCP&L Strategic Vision Historical Situation Long Term Vision Transaction Execution Strategic Management • Limited Leverage with Suppliers • Complex & Costly Order Entry/Payments System • Supplier Proliferation • 25M+ Domestic Suppliers • 1000+ Carriers • Low Level Visibility of Data ‘One Company’ View to Suppliers Strategic Alliances with Fewer Suppliers or Outsource Leverage via Consortiums Automated Transaction Execution Supply Chain Management System Wide Analysis of Data
Sonoco’s Four Key Drivers • Growing the Top Line • Productivity • Capital Effectiveness • People, Culture, and Values
How to Proceed? • message of collaborative cost reduction • take message back to your company • test our approach
Four Step Approach • assess opportunities - your internal operations - our shared logistics activities - our internal operations
Four Step Approach • assess opportunities • joint review and prioritization • 8% price reduction to initiate • reconcile and adjust
Sonoco Productivity Definition • costs compared to previous 12 months • exclusive of market changes • use of appropriate indices to gauge market change adjustment
System-wide Cost Reduction Example One Supplier Company $5 million
System-wide Cost Reduction Example One Supplier Company • 8%adjustment yields $400,000 • Sonoco productivity initiative yields $500,000 • Supplier nets $100,000 favorable gain $5 million
System-wide Cost Reduction Example Two Logistics Company $2 million
System-wide Cost Reduction Example Two Logistics Company • 8%adjustment yields $160,000 • Sonoco discovers additional service capabilities • Supplier realizes new business offsetting price adjustment $2 million
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 9% Global IPD Customer 9% Savings Delivered on Reduced Procurement Costs
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 20% Global IPD Customer 20% Reduction in Packaging Material Return Rate
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 17% Global IPD Customer 17% Savings Delivered on Reduced Warehousing Costs
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 8% Global IPD Customer 8% Savings Delivered on Reduced Shipping and Transportation Costs
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 30% Global IPD Customer 30% Savings Delivered on Reduced Core Cutting Costs
Supply Chain Cost Reduction with Sonoco Global IPD Customer 11% Global IPD Customer 11% Savings Delivered on Total Supply Chain Cost on all Components
Sonoco Purchasing and Logistics Productivity Initiatives Laminates Adhesives External Paper Canadian Projects Flexibles S&E Chemicals Speciality Papers Resins Energy MRO Color Concentrate Ocean Freight Coal Inbound Rail Temporary Labor Packaging Less Than Truckload Small Parcels and Air Express Area Fleet Focus Transport Equipment On-Line Purchasing Warehousing Corrugated Steel Films Lumber Europe Materials Europe Logistics Truckload Carriers IT Outsourcing Telecommunications PC Support Dedicated Trucking Inks
Action Plan Timeline December 1 - 14, 2000 Meet with Sonoco Purchasing / Logistics Representatives Develop Preliminary Productivity Project Summaries, Establish Stretch Productivity Targets December 15, 2000 Communicate Price Adjustment Commitment Communicate Preliminary Productivity Projects January 1, 2001 Adjust Sonoco Price
Action Plan Timeline January 30, 2001 Complete Productivity Plan Prioritization and Work Plan with Sonoco Liaison February 1, 2001 Implement Productivity Programs through and Track Results March 30, 2001 April 30, 2001 Adjust Sonoco Pricing +/- Based on Productivity Program Results
Questions “Why should I adjust my price up front?” • skin in the game • organizational engagement • aggressive targets yield better results
Questions “What skin does Sonoco have in this arrangement?” • willingness to keep you whole • sustainable, long-term approach • requires risk on both sides
Questions “How do I know that you’re committed?” • CEO involvement • 100 years of dependability • deployment of resources
Questions “What’s in it for me?” • long-term approach • compliance • concern for your profitability • open dialogue for new ideas • sound business partner • commitment to success
Wrap-Up Session Charles Coker, Jr.
Sonoco’s Four Key Drivers • Growing the Top Line • Productivity • Capital Effectiveness • People, Culture, and Values
SCP&L Strategic Vision Historical Situation Long Term Vision Transaction Execution Strategic Management • Limited Leverage with Suppliers • Complex & Costly Order Entry/Payments System • Supplier Proliferation • 25M+ Domestic Suppliers • 1000+ Carriers • Low Level Visibility of Data ‘One Company’ View to Suppliers Strategic Alliances with Fewer Suppliers or Outsource Leverage via Consortiums Automated Transaction Execution Supply Chain Management System Wide Analysis of Data
How to Proceed? • message of collaborative cost reduction • take message back to your company • test our approach
Four Step Approach • assess opportunities • joint review and prioritization • 8% price reduction to initiate • reconcile and adjust
Purchasing and Logistics • Sonoco’s Commitment: • Visibility to Opportunities • Compliance • Receptive to Change • Growth
Purchasing and Logistics • Sonoco’s Supplier Expectations: • Fully Integrated Approach to Productivity • Proactive • Leadership • Creativity • Challenge Us!