1 / 17

LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation

LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation. Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota. 1 ns = 0.15 m. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Source: TopScan, Germany. Airborne LiDAR. Ground Surface elevations (30 cm vertical, 1 m horizontal accuracy)

zasha
Download Presentation

LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota

  2. 1 ns = 0.15 m Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

  3. Source: TopScan, Germany Airborne LiDAR • Ground Surface elevations (30 cm vertical, 1 m horizontal accuracy) • Wetland delineation. • Interpolation of water table heights. • Vegetation height and density (i.e., structure) • Improved landcover classification (fusion with imagery). • Spatial estimates of biomass, canopy height, basal area, LAI ,etc (does not saturate!) • Input variable for other models

  4. Elevation and Vegetation Height Bare Earth Elevation (m) Vegetation Height (m) Leaf-On data 2.3 million pulses (15% ground hits) Median height = 5.2 m

  5. East-West cross-section Upland-Wetland Catena Coniferous Wetland North-South cross-section Mixed Forest Hwy 182 Clearcut Grass Shrub Wetland Landscape Profiles Deciduous Upland

  6. Stand Structure First returns for 30 x 30m plots Mixed Upland Alder-Cedar Wetland Height Coniferous Wetland Frequency

  7. 1 km Bare Earth Elevation • “Leaf off” collection • Spring 2006 • 1st and last returns • “Leaf on” collection • Summer 2005 • 1st return only Approx. 1.5 pulse m-2 1 m nearest neighbor interpolation Ground control points (n=34): 100% of QA/QC points ± 15 cm Image difference (n=46 million): 90% of 2005/06 pixels ± 60 cm

  8. LiDAR Methods…Flying is the easy part! • Collect vertical ground control points • Collect field observations for variables of interest (FIA–style plots) • Acquire LiDAR and fine resolution multi-spectral imagery (Quickbird) • Triangulate ‘ground hits’ and compute base height of ‘feature hits’ • Use digital terrain model to extract features • Compute feature heights • Combine feature heights with return intensity, multi-temporal/spectral imagery, and DEM to classify landcover • Extract pulses associated with field plots and compute LiDAR variables (density and height for biomass, GPP/NPP; gap fraction for LAI/fPAR) • Develop relationships between LiDAR and plot variables • Apply relationships to entire scene • Use spatial variable to drive growth models (e.g., MODIS GPP/NPP algorithm)

  9. Training Plots • FIA-style plot design • 76 Upland plots (~30 located precisely enough to be useful for LiDAR analysis) • Wetland plots to be taken this field season • Height and growth in central subplot • Biomass calculated by species specific allometric equations [Biomass] = a [DBH]b • Productivity calculated by inferring past diameters from cored trees

  10. Training Plot Locations

  11. LiDAR Variables Extracted for Each Plot

  12. Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis Full Model 1: Full Model 2: Where Y is the plot-measured variable of interest (biomass, height, productivity, etc)

  13. Canopy Height

  14. Biomass

  15. Productivity

  16. This Field Season

  17. This Field Season

More Related