230 likes | 1.55k Views
MEMS Rigid Diaphragm Speaker. Scott Maghy Tim Havard Sanchit Sehrawat. Macro-scale. Try to make MEMS device based on same concept. Motivation. Few similar products Small size Clandestine Privacy Low power Potential lower cost Highly customizable performance No surgery!.
E N D
1. MEMS Rigid Diaphragm Speaker Scott Maghy
Tim Havard
Sanchit Sehrawat
2. Macro-scale Try to make MEMS device based on same concept
3. Motivation Few similar products
Small size
Clandestine
Privacy
Low power
Potential lower cost
Highly customizable performance
No surgery!
4. Current Hearing Devices Few speakers that fit completely inside the ear
Some piezoelectric speakers
Bone conduction speaker for above the ear: 1 inch long
CMOS MEMS speakers exits, and are being developed
Several hearing devices
Downsides:
Require surgery
Much larger
Cost
Complexity
5. Implantable Hearing Devices Cochlear Implants
Auditory Brainstem implants
Implantable Middle-ear devices
Piezoelectric devices
Electromagnetic devices
7. Piezoelectric Devices Operation
Advantage: inert in a magnetic field
Disadvantage: Power output directly related to size of crystal.
Example:
Middle Ear Transducer (MET)
8. Middle Ear Transducer Translates electrical signals into mechanical motion to directly stimulate the ossicles
9. Middle Ear Transducer
10. Electromagnetic Devices Operation
Small magnet is attached to vibratory structure in ear
Only partially implantable – coil must be housed externally. Sizes of coil & magnet restricted by ear anatomy.
Power decreases as the square of the distance between coil & magnet – coil & magnet must be close
11. Vibrant Soundbridge
12. Ridged Diaphragm MEMS Speaker
13. Materials Polysilicon: structural material for cantilever and diaphragm
Silicon Oxide: for sacrificial layers
Silicon Nitride: isolation of wafer
Gold: electrodes and electrical connections
14. Fabrication
15. Fabrication
16. Fabrication
17. Performance and Optimization
18. Speaker Mechanics
19. Acoustic Modeling
20. Observed Acoustic Power Sound intensity decays quadratically with distance
? This results in limited effective speaker range
21. Comparison of Acoustic Sound Power
22. Improvements Implement a process that allows for sealing of speaker cone to support
This would give better acoustic properties
Could be accomplished by CMOS MEMS procedure
Fabricate cone shape with stamping method to achieve better shape and more cost effective fabrication
23. Improvement Cont. Further research into materials for the cantilevers to decrease stiffness of cantilevers
This would allow greater diaphragm displacement and therefore greater intensity
Other materials exist with lower Young’s modulus that would accomplish this but fabrication is suspect
Other methods of securing the diaphragm
“Spring” attachment
Decrease the mass of the diaphragm by altering fabrication process
24. QUESTIONS