220 likes | 404 Views
Presentation Outline. IntroductionReview of literature and theoretical issuesEmerging multinationalsEmerging multinationals and innovation / R
E N D
1. Innovation Strategies of Emerging Russian Multinationals
2. Presentation Outline Introduction
Review of literature and theoretical issues
Emerging multinationals
Emerging multinationals and innovation / R&D
Innovation and R&D in Russia and Russian companies
Innovation in Russia: macro-view
Innovation in Russian companies
Innovation strategies in Russia
Innovation strategies abroad
Conclusions and Implications
3. Introduction Role of innovation in creating value in MNCs
Emerging market multinationals reaching the global stage and desire to engage in innovative activities to increase firm-level value creation
Research on innovation strategies of emerging MNCs is scant
Besides, Russian MNCs are often overlooked.
Objective of this paper is to explore how Russian EMNCs bridge the gap in innovation capacity both in Russia and internationally
4.
The Economist
15.04.2010
A special report on innovation in emerging markets
‘The emerging world will undoubtedly make a growing contribution to breakthrough innovations’.
5. Research question
What are innovation strategies of emerging Russian MNCs?
How do they organise innovation process in their home base (Russia)?
What is the role of innovation-seeking in their internationalisation (to advanced economies)?
6. Explorative study
Overview of innovation in Russia and innovation strategies in companies
Qualitative approach
Variety of data sources (company reports and web-sites, publications, interviews with experts)
Limitations of data availability: many companies do not publish annual company reports, companies have closed corporate culture and opaque ownership, wide use of offshore companies Research design and approach
7. Literature on Innovation and OFDI Patel and Vega (1999): European and US-based firms locate their activities abroad in technological areas or fields where they are strong in their home market.
Le Bas and Sierra (2002): Japanese firms in Europe seek out locations that have complementary strengths to their own capacities.
Chinese companies establish subsidiaries abroad in technologically-advanced regions to benefit from technology spillovers (Jiang, 2000). Foreign subsidiaries serve as ‘listening points’ for the home base (Frost, 2001).
Filippaois et al (2009): innovation does not come solely from a central R&D lab, but is based on a scientific heterogeneity of the host country R&D centres, subsidiaries and affiliates.
Strategic asset-seeking: seeking learning opportunities rather than investment for strategic purposes (Narula, 2010)
8. OFDI of Russian emerging multinationals The origins can be traced to ‘red multinationals’, but new Russian multinationals are a new phenomenon
OFDI: internationalisation or ‘capital flight’
High OFDI flows into offshore destinations
Starting from expansion in the nearest markets (former USSR), proceed to internationalise into advanced economies
Driven by the foreign trade experience or export orientation of the firm (Filatotchev et al, 2001; Filatotchev and Nolan, 2001)
9. OFDI of Russian emerging multinationals
International expansion due to macro-economic factors (Kalotay 2005, 2010). As the economy grows and firms generate higher revenues they begin to look abroad for new assets
Ownership and state involvement (Liuhto and Vahtra, 2007). As state ownership increases, the state’s role plays an increasing importance in the firms OFDI activities.
Studies explicitly addressing innovation practices in Russian multinationals are scarce (exception: Vahtra, 2010).
10. Transition from Soviet S&T to Russian NIS
Different from developed economies and most emerging economies
Knowledge infrastructure of the ‘world class’ (Narula & Jormanainen, 2008)
Roughly 60% of R&D is publicly financed. The overall R&D investment is higher than in other emerging economies
Russian education system
The S&T system does not produce as much innovation and R&D as expected
Fragmentation of research institutes and Russian Academy of Sciences (2900 research institutes)
Weak IPR regime
Access to venture capital / innovative start-ups
Innovation in Russia
11. Russia’s Knowledge Economy Index
12. PWC (2010) survey among 100 large companies
Over the period of 2008-2010
39% of companies introduced new products
73% - innovative technologies
66% - innovative business processes
Innovation in Russian companies
13. Innovation strategies of Russian firms
14. Innovation practices in Russia Acquisition of state-owned research institutes building on the Soviet legacy
Creating in-house R&D departments the path towards organic innovative development
Strategic alliances with western multinationals importing knowledge from abroad
15. Privatisation of research institutes (formerly parts of the Soviet Academy of Sciences and of respective ministries)
Expertise in traditional (low and medium-tech) sectors
Acquires are (former) state-owned enterprises that had a prior collaborative experience with these institutes
Gazprom: VNIIGAZ research institutes
Rosneft: corporate R&D lab and 10 regional centres
Surgutneftegaz: SurgutNIPIneft and Lengiproneftekhim
Norilsk Nickel: Gipronickel 1. Acquisition of public research institutes
16. Establishment of R&D departments ‘from scratch’
IT sector / low capital investment sectors
Benefiting from human capital – engineers and experts trained by the Soviet academic system
Lukoil: internal R&D department and RITEC company (est 1992)
Sistema (a consumer-focused technology group): in 2006 started establishing R&D centres in each of its main businesses
Kaspersky Lab (a leading computer security software developer): start-up in 1997, presently 4th largest global antivirus vendor
Auriga – a software R&D and IT outsourcing services provider, a start-up established in 1990 by Soviet engineers 2. Establishment of in-house R&D departments
17. Collaborative agreements with Western companies
Expertise missing in Russia
Sectors: high-tech (telecom) but also oil and gas
Mostly privately-owned multinationals
MTS (a telecom provider) and Ericsson
Beeline (a telecom provider) and Ericsson
Yukos (oil and gas exploration) and Schlumberger ? increase of production rates of oil well by 30%-200%
Lukoil and Conoco Philips
3. Strategic alliances with Western companies
18. Asset-seeking motive
No formal approval process of international investment, but tacit approval for cross-border deals with the leaders of government
Sectors: from medium-tech to high-tech
Acquisition of Swiss company Sulzer AG by Renova
Oregon Steel Mills by Evraz Group
Social networking web-sites (Facebook, ICQ) by Digital Sky Technologies
High risk of failure (political reasons / inability to apply foreign technology)
Basic Element & Magna International / Sberbank & Opel AG / LDV and GAZ Group 4. Acquisition of foreign technology-intensive companies
19. Collaborative efforts of Russian multinationals / their subsidiaries abroad
By acquiring technology-intensive companies abroad, Russian companies obtain access to their networks and partners
Russian Technologies state corporation
Joint R&D programmes: Sanofi-Aventis, Pirelli, Alcatel-Lucent, Thales, Boeing 5. Collaboration abroad
20. Internationalisation and Innovation Strategies A very idiosyncratic way of innovation process in Russian companies
different from the transition period-practices
different from many other emerging economies and developed economies
Weak ties between Russian firms and Russian R&D centers
Acquisition of foreign technology-intensive companies
Seeking assets abroad
State support and coordination are crucial
Role of State Corporations
21. Policy Implications Home country (Russia)
Improvement of macro-economic climate for innovation
Stimulus for commercialisation of innovation
Reform of the public R&D sector (Academy of Sciences)
Make IPR regime more effective
Host countries (advanced economies)
Governments of developed economies are wary of expansion trajectories of Russian multinationals
Fear of losing technological assets and advanced know-how
Collaboration and strategic alliances cause less concerns
22. Managerial Implications Realise the strategic value of innovation
Implement a diversified innovation strategy
Foster organisational learning
Promote innovative thinking within organisation