1 / 30

Information Technology, Efficiency and Productivity: Evidence From Korean Local Governments

Information Technology, Efficiency and Productivity: Evidence From Korean Local Governments. Nakil Sung University of Seoul, nisung@uos.ac.kr International Telecommunications Society 15 th Biennial Conference 2004 Berlin, Germany. Contents. Research Motivation Research Methods

zenda
Download Presentation

Information Technology, Efficiency and Productivity: Evidence From Korean Local Governments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information Technology, Efficiency and Productivity: Evidence From Korean Local Governments Nakil Sung University of Seoul, nisung@uos.ac.kr International Telecommunications Society 15th Biennial Conference 2004 Berlin, Germany

  2. Contents • Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  3. Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  4. Research Motivation Yes, Too Many Studies on IT Productivity Effects • The first generation of studies often provided mixed empirical results on the Solow’s productivity paradox until the late 1990’s • The productivity paradox was partly resolved by observing faster productivity growth in developed countries. • The second generation of studies focuses on the performance of IT-using sectors. • Many studies agree that rapid productivity growth in IT-producing sectors led to better performance of national economy.

  5. Research Motivation The Second Generation of ‘IT Productivity’ Literature • Recent studies are fairly successful in confirming positive effects of IT. • For example, Jorgenson (2001), Brynjolfsson and Hitt (1996, 2000), Stiroh (2001), Mun and Nadiri (2002). • These studies mainly use micro data such as industry or firm data. • The use of micro data is a good way of identifying ‘IT productivity effects’ because it provides researchers with a chance of distinguishing IT-heavy users from IT-light users.

  6. Research Motivation But, More Studies Are Still Needed In Some Areas • As usual, the current literature does not distinguish (technical) efficiency from productivity. • Only Milana and Zeli (2002) examine the relationship between IT investments and technical efficiency. • Is there any better measure of IT-using activities? • Many studies use the purchase costs of IT-related equipment as a proxy for the state of IT. • On the other hand, the performance of IT users must be affected by effective use and applications of IT.

  7. Research Motivation Korean Case Provides a Good Research Opportunity Because… • The Korean government has reported an index of IT-using activities (called Informatization Index) for all local governments. • This index measures a wide range of IT-related activities. • Also, like other countries, good and reliable data on local public services are publically available in Korea.

  8. Research Motivation Informatization Index

  9. Research Motivation Then, the Study Has Two Objectives • Measuring (technical) efficiency and productivity growth for all Korean local governments • By applying conventional methods • Examining the effects of IT on (technical) efficiency and productivity growth • By using the Information Indexes

  10. Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  11. Research Methods Research Strategy: Two Stage Approach • First Stage: Measurement of (technical) efficiency and TFP growth by using distance functions. • Both efficiency and productivity growth are defined and measured by using distance function • The distance function is estimated by applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). • Second Stage: Efficiency and productivity regressions • Efficiency scores and productivity growth rates are regressed on some regional characteristic variables and the Informatization Index.

  12. Research Methods Y1 B Production Possibility Curve A O Y2 Technical Efficiency: Output-Oriented Measure Distance Function :

  13. Research Methods Malmquist Productivity Index • Period-s (output-oriented) Malmquist productivity index • Malmquist productivity index between period-s and period-t

  14. Research Methods Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Index Efficiency Change Technical Change

  15. Research Methods Data Envelopment Analysis • Charnes-Cooper-Rhodes (CCR) Model: constant returns-to-scale (CRS) assumption • Bankers-Charnes-Cooper (BCC) Model: variable returns-to-scale (VRS) assumption • convexity condition: The optimal solution to this LP problem is the output distance function.

  16. Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  17. Efficiency and TFP Growth Two Levels of Local Governments in Korea Metropolitan Cities: 7 Districts (Gu): 69 KOREA Provinces: 9 Cities (Shi): 70 Counties (Gun): 83 Samples

  18. Efficiency and TFP Growth Input and Output Variables

  19. Efficiency and TFP Growth Application of DEA Models • Both CCR (CRS) model and BCC (VRS) model are applied to input and output data over the period 1999-2001. Then the estimates are averaged. • Operation environment of local governments should be taken into account. • Method 1: First, evaluate local governments under handicaps and second, use this information to evaluate local governments in better environments. • Method 2: Evaluate local governments only within the group.

  20. Efficiency and TFP Growth Average Technical Efficiency Scores (1999-2001) Note: STD implies standard deviation

  21. Efficiency and TFP Growth Average TFP Growth Rates (1999-2001) Note: STD implies standard deviation

  22. Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  23. Regression Results Efficiency and Productivity Regressions • Definition of variables • TIE: technical inefficiency score, • dTFP: TFP growth rate (Malmquist productivity index) • RC: regional characteristic variables • ZSCORE: Informatization Index • Estimation technique: censored Tobit method • The TIE takes a value between 0 and infinity.

  24. Regression Results Regional Characteristic Variables

  25. Regression Results Technical Efficiency Regressions Note: *,**,** implies statistical significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively

  26. Regression Results TFP Growth Rate Regressions Note: *,**,** implies statistical significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively

  27. Research Motivation • Research Methods • Result 1: Efficiency and TFP Growth Estimation • Result 2: Regression Results • Conclusion

  28. Conclusions Summary • Local governments in more populous regions tend to be more technical efficient and to experience higher TFP growth. • Local governments in more business- or industry-centered regions may operate closer to production frontier and enjoy higher TFP growth. • There exists a negative (positive) relationship between gross regional product and technical efficiency (TFP growth). • Local governments with higher level of informatization operate closer to production frontier and experience higher TFP growth rate.

  29. Conclusions Contribution • The study successfully confirms a positive role of IT in improving technical efficiency and accelerating productivity growth. • The study provides strong cases on the development of e-Government projects in many countries.

  30. Thank You For Your Attention!

More Related