1 / 32

Ensuring Success for Every Student

Ensuring Success for Every Student Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting. District 219 Mission 1. To ensure a student-focused learning environment where every student succeeds.

zenia
Download Presentation

Ensuring Success for Every Student

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ensuring Success for Every Student Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting

  2. District 219 Mission 1 To ensure a student-focused learning environment where every student succeeds. DISTRICT 219 PHILOSOPHY D219 GROWTH MODEL Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting ALIGNED

  3. Accounts for confounding variables, i.e. SES, Sp. Ed., Race Growth is determined under local programs, courses and teachers Propensity scores can capture achievement potential from multiple past achievement records with different growth projections/scales Same testing windows Same Assessments or combination of assessments – District chooses LOCAL growth model 1 Uses Local Norming – not State, Regional or Federal

  4. Eliminate known limitations of the EPAS system for measuring growth Reliably identify students at risk for not being on track to meet or exceed state standards Capture individual and aggregate value-added growth Provide more meaningful growth benchmarks; benchmarks individual student growth against typical growth of similar D219 students Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting D219’S LGM 1 In addition benchmarking growth against state, national and college readiness benchmarks, the growth model benchmarks individual and aggregate growth against local norms. Local norms provide the following benefits:

  5. TEACHER AND ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION PLACING STUDENTS into the most rigorous courses; ensuring all students have equitable access to instruction within the curriculum; academic intervention placement MONITORING THE ACHIEVMENT GROWTH of every individual student; setting realistic but rigorous individual targets Application 1 Program and course evaluation – RETURN ON INVESTMENT

  6. Practice ACT EXPLORE (for course placement) PLAN ACT/PSAE GRADE 8 SPRING GRADE 9 SPRING GRADE 10 SPRING GRADE 11 Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Current D219 EPAS Program

  7. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Local Norms Example: Mathematics CRL = College Readiness Level

  8. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Setting Individual Targets Individual Student Targets: Mathematics *Note: Student has not yet taken ACT Every student will grow one point greater each year than comparable students in the norm group. CRL = College Readiness Level

  9. ILP STUDENT A Releases have been obtained by the parents to use this data in this presentation

  10. Setting realistic, but rigorous individual student targets for every single student. Ensuring students have access to the most important components of the curriculum through appropriate course placement and access to interventions. Improving the effectiveness of all programs. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Value-Added Education If the District 219 Instructional Program is improving, students should outperform the projections. How are we going to do that? One student at a time by: Adds to the conversation – HIGH SCHOOL READINESS

  11. Rigor will be stressed when considering placement. Students will be placed in the highest-level course that is supported by the data. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Course Placement District 219 will also be using the models to reliably and analytically recommend eighth-grade students into freshman-year courses.

  12. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Course Placement: Rules of Thumb Placement decision rules are based on sophisticated analytical procedures. The following table shows a simple rule of thumb that works for most cases. Rules of Thumb: Math

  13. Summer 2010

  14. 131 students enrolled in Algebra Readiness to improve mathematics deficiencies • 33% of these students tested out of the extension course • Average proficiency went from 20% to 52% mastery of learning targets for Algebra • Algebra Readiness students increased their EXPLORE math scores by an average of 2.6 points Summer 2011 Algebra Readiness Results

  15. Summer 2011Algebra Proficiency Results • 75 students enrolled in Algebra Proficiency • 88% were promoted to Geometry • Due to both summer Algebra Proficiency and the Algebra Proficiency exam, 223 students who would have normally retaken Algebra as freshmen are taking Geometry. • This alters their destiny, as they will be able to take Calculus as a senior

  16. How do we know if a student or group of students performed any better than they would have anyways: Historically, our inability to answer this question has been related to the absence of control groups. EVALUATION and Value-Added Growth Models Value-added growth models are designed to answer a basic question that has frustrated educators for decades. • - In a different school • - Under a different curriculum • -If they were not in a particular program • With a different teacher

  17. Teacher/Administrator Evaluation 1

  18. 1. PAR in D219: Vision PAR is a comprehensive and collaborative process for effectively mentoring, assisting, developing, and evaluating teachers. PAR represents a shared vision between the District and the NTFT of great teaching, high quality mentoring and supervision, and best practices in evaluation. It fosters a trusting environment where all members of the organization assume responsibility for developing and promoting high standards in teaching.

  19. 2. PAR in D219 Highlights • Teachers Evaluate Teachers. The PAR Panel, a joint union-administrative committee, appoints Consulting Teachers who guide and evaluate teachers. - Untenured years 1 & 2 and tenured who “need improvement”. • The PAR Panel acts upon retention and dismissal recommendations from the Consulting Teachers and Directors. • Directors continue to be content-area leaders in every department, but the role of the Director shifts from evaluator to guide for teachers working with a Consulting Teacher.

  20. 3. PAR Rollout in D219 • During the 2011-2012 school year, only first year untenured teachers will participate in PAR. • In the 2012-2013 school year, 1st and 2nd year untenured teachers and tenured teachers who either self-refer or receive ratings warranting PAR as their professional development plan will participate in PAR. (Student Achievement data pilot for tenured in English & Math)

  21. Legal Context for Use of Growth Models in Evaluation • 105 ILCS 5/10-23.8 requires new multi-year admin contracts be performance contacts • Illinois Public Act 96-0861 requires student growth be used in teacher and principal evaluations

More Related