1 / 20

Major Recent, Current, Upcoming Projects

THE SAFE AND TOGETHER MODEL: Using the Safe and Together Model for Community Based Care Organizations Kristen Selleck, MSW David Mandel & Associates LLC September 2011. Major Recent, Current, Upcoming Projects. Statewide Service Administration (CT DCF ): DV Consultants

zihna
Download Presentation

Major Recent, Current, Upcoming Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE SAFE AND TOGETHER MODEL:Using the Safe and Together Model for Community Based Care Organizations Kristen Selleck, MSW David Mandel & Associates LLC September 2011

  2. Major Recent, Current, Upcoming Projects • Statewide Service Administration (CT DCF): DV Consultants • Subject Matter Expert Training (FL DCF) • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Lake City • CLS Training (FL DCF) • Safe and Together Advocate Training (FCADV) • All Child Welfare Supervisors (LA) • Safe and Together Supervisor Training (KC MO) • Alternative Response Pilot (OH): Train the Trainers

  3. Intersection of domestic violence and other child welfare concerns

  4. Domestic Violence as Concern and a Context

  5. Pathways to harm

  6. Safe and Together Assumptions: Policy • Child Welfare (and others) need DV competencies • Distinct from but complements cross system collaboration • Child welfare can benefit from good relationships with and the expertise of domestic violence advocates • Child Welfare has distinct and unique role • 95% alignment • Double standards around gender can benefit domestic violence perpetrators

  7. Safe and Together Assumptions: Practice • Batterers can harm children • Child safety and risk assessment flows first and foremost from an understanding of the perpetrator’s tactics • NOT from focusing on where people are living or the status of the relationship • Better assessment trumps empathy as tool • Principles and critical components of Safe and Together provide a framework for case practice and cross system collaboration

  8. Safe and Together Model

  9. Safe and Together™ Principles 1 Keeping child Safe and Together™ with non-offending parent Safety Healing from trauma Stability and nurturance 2 Partnering with non-offending parent as default position Efficient Effective Child-centered 3 Intervening with perpetrator to reduce risk and harm to child Engagement Accountability Courts (C) 2011 David Mandel & Associates LLC For more information on the Safe and Together™ model, go to www.endingviolence.com

  10. Safe and Together™ Critical Components

  11. Actions taken by the batterer to harm the children

  12. Examples of Documentation Recommendations • Do not lump batterer and survivor together. Avoid phrases like • “Couple engages in violence” • “Parents have a history of domestic violence” • “Parents both deny the violence.” • Precise & descriptive • Avoid euphemisms or vague terms like “argued” if what you mean is “hit” • Describe the pattern: “father has engaged in an escalating pattern of physical violence and intimidation that involved multiple incidents of physical assault, threats to kill the mother and her children.” • Affirm the perpetrator’s role in harming the children through his actions • “These behaviors have isolated the mother from her support system, the children from relatives and led to them moving school systems and residences twice in the past year (as a result of evictions).” • Avoid blaming the victim for the perpetrator’s violent and abusive behavior • Language to avoid: • Dysfunctional” family • Mother “allows” or “enables” the violence • Mother “failed to protect” the children

  13. Recommended Alternative to “Failure to Protect” Language Use language that focuses on the perpetrator’s role in creating harm or risk to the children. Example: “Despite the mother’s efforts to protect the children, the perpetrator is creating conditions injurious and harmful to the children.” (CT Collaborative)‏

  14. Assessing Child welfare Skills Required to Partner with Survivors • Ability to introduce child welfare’s concerns in a non-blaming way. • Assessing/listening for her strengths as it relates to day to day safety and well being efforts • Validating her strengths • Collaboratively developing a safety plan • Developing a case plan that supports her needs/doesn’t set her up to fail/helps her • Working collaboratively with victim services • Presenting survivors strengths to supervisor and/or team (who may be less than sympathetic) • Making appropriate referrals to substance abuse , mental health and in-home service providers • Developing a petition that focuses on the domestic violence perpetrator as the source of the safety concerns

  15. Strengths Based Approach to Non-offending Parent

  16. Building Partnerships with survivors • How good are your workers in building partnerships with survivors around the safety of the children? • How are they framing the Department’s concerns around child safety to the survivor? • How are they asking questions to assess her strengths around safety and well being? • Are they able to take a non-blaming approach to the survivor? • Are they validating her strengths? • Can they work collaboratively with the survivor to develop a plan for the child’s safety?

  17. Efficient, Effective Safety Planning • Requires knowledge about batterer’s pattern of behavior • Builds on survivor’s efforts • Developed in collaboration with survivor • Might include going to shelter, calling police, getting injunction • BUT does not rely exclusive on those three things • Includes informal resources (friends, family, employer) • Attempts to account for other critical child’s needs like stability • Whatever plan, it needs to be well documented

  18. Example of case planning practice associated with partnering with the non-offending parent • Don’ts • “Ms. Smith agrees not to engage in further domestic violence.” • “Ms. Smith will not violate the restraining order against Mr. Smith” • “Ms. Smith will ensure that Mr. Smith will have no further contact with the child. ” • Do’s • If Mr. Smith begins to escalate his threats or intimidation, Ms. Smith will report concerns to the Department. • Ms. Smith will continue to work with her domestic violence advocate to modify her safety plan as necessary. • Ms. Smith will discuss with her mother a plan for moving in with her if there are new concerns of violence. • Ms. Smith will report any violations of Mr. Smith’s restraining order to law enforcement and the Department. • If Mr. Smith is violent, Ms. Smith will implement the agreed upon safety plan for herself and her children. This involves taking the children to stay with her mother until she can contact her DCF worker.

  19. Safe and Together Training and Technical Assistance

  20. For more information David Mandel & Associates LLC Ph: 860-319-0966 email: davidmandel@endingviolence.com kristenselleck@endingviolence.com http://safe-and-together.endingviolence.com/blog/

More Related