1 / 34

Fredrik Livheim Georgios Makris Ioannis Pantziaras Cave Sinai

A randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ACT). - Does treatment increase the activity of default network in patients suffering from schizophrenia, measured with fMRI?. Fredrik Livheim Georgios Makris Ioannis Pantziaras Cave Sinai. Study Aims.

finley
Download Presentation

Fredrik Livheim Georgios Makris Ioannis Pantziaras Cave Sinai

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ACT). - Does treatment increase the activity of default network in patients suffering from schizophrenia, measured with fMRI? Fredrik Livheim Georgios Makris Ioannis Pantziaras Cave Sinai

  2. Study Aims • To study treatment effects of CBT/ACT in schizophrenia. • Are the treatment effects mediated by changes observable by increased default network activity, as observed with fMRI?

  3. Background (treatment) • Three studies made on short (less then 10 hour) ACT interventions and Schizophrenia, the first: • Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006). Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Pilot results. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(3), 415-437. • 40 psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms were randomly assigned to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) or ETAU plus 3 individual sessions of ACT.

  4. Background (treatment, study 1) • OUTCOME IN FAVOR OF ACT: • Less affective symptoms, • Better overall improvement, • Less social impairment, and distress associated with hallucinations. • More participants in the ACT condition reached clinically significant symptom improvement at discharge. • Less 4-month rehospitalisation rates in ACT group • WHY? • Decreases in the believabilityof hallucinations • Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006). Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Pilot results. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(3), 415-437.

  5. Background (treatment, study 2) • Bach, P., Hayes, S. C. & Gallop, R. (in press). Long term effects of brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for psychosis. Behavior Modification. • 80 psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms were randomly assigned to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) or ETAU plus 4 individual sessions of ACT. • OUTCOME : • ACT group had higher symptom reporting! • BUT 50% less rehospitalisation rates • Effects explained by lower symptom believability

  6. Background (treatment, study 2) • Bach, P., Hayes, S. C. & Gallop, R. (in press). Long term effects of brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for psychosis. Behavior Modification. • Effects holds at one year follow up

  7. Background (treatment, study 3) • A study of emotional upheaval following a psychotic break, White et al (in press) and found lower rates of depression and fewer crisis calls in the three months following 10 sessions of ACT. • White, R.G., Gumley, A.I., McTaggart, J., Rattrie, L., McConville, D., Cleare, S, & Mitchell G. (in press). A feasibility study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for emotional dysfunction following psychosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy.

  8. Background (fMRI & DTI) • Previous studies: • The neurobiology of self-awareness in Schizophrenia – a fMRI study. (Shad et al. 2012) • Self-awareness (SA) is one of the core domains of higher cortical functions and is frequently compromised in schizophrenia. • Deficits in SA have been associated with functional and psychosocial impairment in this patient population.

  9. Background (fMRI & DTI) • A meta-analysisof 27 studies by Northoff et al. (2006) identifiedthree clusters of medial wallactivationsduringself- vs otherdirected stimuli, centred in: • medial prefrontal, • dorsal anteriorcingulate, and • posteriorcingulate regions, • thatshowedincreasedactivationwhen tasks requiredjudgementsabout the self-relevanceof stimuli, irrespectiveof the stimulus domain or sensorymodality. • Theyadvocate an integratedcortical–subcorticalmidline system underlying the human self.

  10. Background (fMRI & DTI) Buckner et al. 2012. The Brain’s Default Network - Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease • The default networkcanhelp for understanding mental disorders including autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’sdisease. • Adaptive rolesof the default network for usingpastexperiencesto plan for the future, navigate social interactions, and maximize the utilityof moments whenweare not otherwiseengaged by the externalworld

  11. Background (fMRI & DTI) Carhart-Harrisa et al. 2011. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin.

  12. Background (fMRI & DTI) Carhart-Harrisa et al. 2011. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. • Psilocybincaused a significantdecrease in the positive couplingbetween the mPFC and PCC • Theseresultsstronglyimplythat the subjectiveeffectsofpsychedelicdrugsarecaused by decreasedactivity and connectivity in the brain’skeyconnectorhubs, enabling a stateofunconstrainedcognition.

  13. Methods

  14. Study groups • A sample of 60 in-patients suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. Randomization to either CBT/ACT enhanced treatment as usual (ACT-TAU) or enhanced treatment as usual (E-TAU). • Measurements before and after treatment, as well as 1 year after treatment. • fMRI and DTI the day before start of treatment and one day after treatment termination.

  15. Study groups • 4. Exclusion: • a) Due to treatment: • - Not speaking Swedish • - Psychosis induced by dementia • b) Due to fMRI: • - left-handed • - pregnant or breast-feeding • - metal implants or claustrophobia

  16. Treatment • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a form of Contextual CBT. • Delivered in small groups, max 6 persons • Hypothesis for presenting problems, largely through • Weak sense of self • Avoidance of painful experiences in “the now” (experiential avoidance) • Vulnerability, biological/genetic predispositions, often in combination with environmental factors (abuse, trauma etc.)

  17. Treatment • Hypothesis for improvements, largely through: • More stable sense of self. Through training in Relational Frames, multiple exemplar training in stimulus equivalence and the relational frames I-YOU, HERE-THERE, NOW-THEN. This will have spill over effects on contecting the “I-Here-Now”. • Seeing delusions and hallucinations as they are. Through training in de-fusion. This will also give exposure, and increase acceptance. • … and this is done in the context of helping participants • contact what they hold as important in life.

  18. Treatment (believability) - Seeing delusions and hallucinations as they are

  19. Treatment (the self in ACT) • The self in ACT is believed to be natural by-products of verbal behaviour, language (Hayes 1995). Deictics and complex behavior: Self discrimination of multiple behaviors • “I’m eating icecream” • “I’m driving back” • “I’m doing some yard work” And of multiple thoughts, feelings and sensations • “I feel sad” • “I feel miserable” Lead to Discriminating the perspective of “I” as the absolute invariant

  20. Treatment (the self in ACT) I am bad I am good I am a husband I am a doctor I think of my father I think of lunchtime I think of your pain I think of my work I go back to school I go into the dark I go home I go to my office I touch the screen I touch my face I touch into the water I touch the hot pan I see and hear a dog I see a bright future I see you coming I see a desk I hear my mother calling I hear birds singing I hear a driving car I hear music I eat chocolate I eat ice cream I eat bread I eat a steak

  21. Treatment (the self in ACT) I am bad I am good I am a husband I am a doctor I think of my father I think of lunchtime I think of your pain I think of my work I go back to school I go into the dark I go home I go to my office I touch the screen I touch my face I touch into the water I touch the hot pan I see and hear a dog I see a bright future I see you coming I see a desk I eat chocolate I hear my mother calling I hear birds singing I hear a driving car I eat ice cream I eat bread I eat a steak I hear music

  22. Treatment (the self in ACT) I eat bread I eat ice cream I eat a steak I eat chocolate I hear music I hear a driving car I hear birds singing I hear my mother calling I see a desk I see you coming I see a bright future I see and hear a dog

  23. YOU HERE NOW I THEN THERE RFT Take on the Formation of Self and Perspective Taking

  24. The I-Here-Nowness of Awareness is the Foundation of Perspective Taking Self-as-context

  25. Method • 3 Tesla, with DTI, SPM conversion software • fMRI: Gives functional activity measures. • DTI: Gives connectivity images of different active components in self-concept activity in the brain. DTI helps interpreting fMRI data and establishing how activated foci are linked together through networks.

  26. Method • fMRI: Gives functional activity measures: • Activation and deactivation of self-related tasks in different domains employing different stimuli such as trait adjectives, memories, emotions. • Self-related imagery and self-talk on audio and visual input via headphones and googles. • Own and other’s personality traits vs. unrelated to me-you (deiactic frame).

  27. Outcome measures: • 1. Time to re-admissions:Measured with: Patient register • 2. Improved quality of life:Measured with: PQVS (Subjective Life Quality Profile), strengths: 2 measurements. QUALY. • 3. Acceptance of positive symptoms?Measured with: AAQ2 (Acceptance and action questionnaire)

  28. Outcome measures: • 4. Self-awareness:Measured with: Situational self awareness scale (SSAS) • 5. Life functioning:Measured with: Life Functioning Questionnaire (LFQ), work, friends etc. • 6. Changes in default network activityMeasured with fMR and DTI

  29. Outcome measures: • 7. Depressive stateMeasured by Calgary Depression Scale (CDS), SZ sens. • 8. AnxietyMeasured by Becks Anxiety Inventory (BAI) • 9. Distress and believability: Rating from 0-100. For the distress (“On a scale of 0 -100, how distressed are you when you hear voices?) • Rating from 0-100. For the believability (“On a scale of 0 -100, , to what degree do you believe that X (e.g., gang members are stalking you, the voices telling you that you are a bad person) is true?)

  30. Significance • If treatment is effective, it can relieve large amounts of human suffering • It has the potential to decrease large societal costs. The economic costs of schizophrenia are especially large due to: • - Treatment adherence - Relapse - Inpatient admission • The treatment can easily be introduced in common clinical praxis

  31. Significance • This study will give answers to what neurological underpinnings that are correlated to treatment effects • With better understanding of neurobiological correlates, we can develop optimized treatments in the future.

  32. Significance • If treatment is effective, it can relieve large amounts of human suffering. • It has the potential to decrease large societal costs. The economic costs of schizophrenia • The treatment can easily be introduced in common clinical praxis. • Support for theories of what neurological underpinnings correlated to treatment effects • With better understanding of neurobiological correlates, we can develop optimized treatments in the future.

  33. Thanks for your attention! GeorgiosMakris IoannisPantziaras Cave Sinai Fredrik Livheim

More Related