FUTURE TACTICAL TRUCK SYSTEM (FTTS)

1. FUTURE TACTICAL TRUCK SYSTEM (FTTS)

2. The Objective Force…Our Future Army Soldiers Leader Development Organization Training Materiel Doctrine Installations Unit of Employment Unit of action FCS Battalions

3. Future Combat Systems FCS is a networked system of systems that will serve as the core building block within all maneuver Unit of Action echelons to develop overmatching combat power, sustainability, agility, and versatility necessary for full spectrum military operations.

4. York Edgewood Arsenal Dover Washington, D.C. Strasburg 75km Radius Area of Influence Stafford 150km Radius Area of Interest CA CA CA Richmond FSB UA Area of Operations

5. COMMONALITY • INTEROPERABILITY • IMBEDDED DIAGNOSTICS & PROGNOSTICS • REDUCED ASL/PLL • MAINTAIN PACE • AGILE • SURVIVABILE • ORGANIC DEFENSE • ADVANCED PROPULSION • FLEXIBILITY Current TWV Operational Shortfalls TREMENDOUS LOGISTICS FOOTPRINT • MULTIPLE LINES OF ASL/PLL • VARYING DEGREES OF MOBILITY • DEPLOYABILITY DEGRADATION • SURVIVABILITY INEPT • LIMITED DEFENSE • HIGH DEGREE OF LOGISTICS SUPPORT • AGING TECHNOLOGY • LARGE CL III CONSUMER • NO INTEGRATION • INSIGNIFICANT COMMONALITY AMONG FLEETS • INEFFICIENT BATTLEFIELD DISTRIBUTION PROCESS DEVELOP ONE FAMILY FLEET 250,000 TWVS IN SERVICE 40+ VARIANTS

6. From The Army G-4 • We must challenge Defense Contractors and their engineers to design systems that meet tough requirements. • Self reporting • No vehicles that get less than 30 mpg • No repairables • No spares • No Systems w/o embedded diagnostics/prognostics • Future systems must be built with ultra reliable components that require minimal preventive maintenance, and when maintenance is required repairs and services are easily and quickly performed. • No special tools • No external TMDE • MTBF > Duration of pulsed operations • We may have to pay up front for such “Ultra-reliable” systems, but our future warfightingconcepts depend on them. If systems don’t perform as advertised, there should be penalties. “Significant reduction in the logistics footprint and costs will occur when reliability, maintainability, And fuel efficiency are effectively balanced with Cost, Schedule and Performance”

7. Responsive Responsive Ø Ø Deployable Ø Deployable Ø Ø Agile Ø Agile Ø Versatile Ø Versatile Ø Survivable Lethal Ø Lethal Ø Survivable Ø Survivable Ø Sustainable Ø Sustainable Ø The Need for an FTTS Transformational Changes Deployability SBCT CoC Transportability Findings: • >5 hrs to remove/Install S280 Shelters • >1 hr to remove/install ring mounts • Added an additional 45 Light Cranes (MHE) • 144 TWVs required MHE for C-130 • Long RSOI times • TWVs C-130 deployable w/o loads Theme: “Reduced Logistics Footprint” C-130 Roll-on/Roll-off w/load Fuel is 70% of the Logistics Burden Responsiveness Versatility Truck Variants Material Handling Equipment Current TWVs: • Less than 10% have Comms Capability • Average range is 300 miles w/o refueling FTTS: • Imbedded/Integrated C4ISR will provide 100% Comms with the Warfighter in the UoA • Fuel Efficiency will increase range 100-200% allowing fluid distribution over greater operational distances (600 – 900 miles) w/no increase in tank capacity 3 to 1 8 to 1 Load HandlingSystem 4 to 2 Delivery Platforms 5 to 1 Interface Devices FTTS Modular Platform Increased Range thru fuel efficiency and dynamic movement tracking Seamless Distribution System

8. Sustainability Lethality Deployability Versatility Survivability Agility Responsiveness FTTS CONCEPTS DESCRIPTION: The FTTS-MSV is a multi functional, multi proponent single tactical truck family based upon a common chassis design sharing commonality with the UV. MISSION: Provides direct support to Unit of Action Brigades in terms of transportation and distribution of cargo, equipment, and personnel. OBJECTIVE FORCE ~200 FTTS-MSV Per UoA DESCRIPTION: The FTTS-UV is a multi-purpose tactical truck family based upon a common chassis design sharing commonality with MSV. MISSION: Provides light TWV support to the Unit of Action (UA) and the Unit of Employment (UE) in terms of C2, system support platform, and unit mobility. Two fleets promote: Reduction in Logistics Footprint Commonality among fleets ~150 FTTS-UV Per UoA

9. Threshold Capabilities Sustainability • Reliability – MTBF > duration of Pulsed Operations • Maintainability – Self-reporting, no special tools, No TMDE, and No Spares Agility • Higher Mobility Rated Speed: 50% increase • Must be able to go where FCS goes and bypass built up Areas to deliver support Deployability • C130 Roll on/Roll off w/load • Ready to support off the ramp Without vehicle preparation or Transportability waivers Lethality Survivability • Reduced Emissions and Signature • Designed upfront to provide time definite and assured delivery Versatility • Advanced Load Handling • Interchangeable/Intermodal Operation • On Board Power & water Generation • Deliver integrated, common, formed Packaging Responsiveness • Greater Fuel Efficiency 100 - 200% • Dynamic Movement Tracking and Re-routing • Greater Range 600 – 900 miles • Integrated C4ISR ORD Starting Point

10. Technology Roadmap • MATURE TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCED AND VALIDATED ON CURRENT PLATFORMS • OPEN SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT – “SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS” • EFFECTIVELY INTEGRATE OBJECTIVE FORCE CONCEPTS • PULL FORWARD FTTS TECHNOLOGY INTO CURRENT PLATFORMS Current Platforms OBJ FORCE FTTS HORIZONTAL TECH INSERTION FCS

11. FTTS Technology Strategy • Leveraging of technology critical • No one source has all the answers • No one program has all the resources • Collaborative environment the key enabler • AKO • ACE (Advanced Collaborative Environment) Prototype Development and Test Integration & Eval thru M&S Develop & Demo Technology Build Partnerships

12. Future Tactical Trucks Dilemma FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 ACTD SDD PRODUCTION A B C Tech Insertion Over time 60% Solution 80% Solution

13. FTTS ACQUISITION STRATEGY • Will be initiated with an Advanced Concept Technology Demo • Prepare industry • Refine requirements • Program staged to follow in step with the FCS Program • Enable the insertion of FCS technologies • Concept & Technology Development effort predominately Modeling & Simulation • Focus on reduction of logistic footprint • Validate application of Objective Force infrastructure • System Development & Demonstration phase • First stage of phase features modeling and simulation to evaluate and refine contractor’s offerings • Second phase involves production and testing of prototypes

14. MS B Approval MS C FUE IOC Milestone Schedule Phase FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Concept and STATUS: Feb 03 – MAA/MNA Apr 03 – ACTD Proposal May 03 – O&O Sep 03 – ICD Apr 05 – CDD Aug 07 – CPD Aug 10 – FUE (MSV) MNS/MS A Approval ORD Tech Development ACTD System MS B Approval Development & SDD Demonstration MS C IOC FUE Production & FULL SCALE PRODUCTION LRIP Deployment CTD Award FCS Schedule FULL SCALE PRODUCTION Reduces Acquisition Risk for the PM FTTS-UV Schedule currently 4 years behind FTTS-MSV with procurement funding Beginning in FY12

15. Summary • Legacy platforms can achieve only a subset of required Objective Force capabilities • FTTS maximizes opportunities for Objective Force capability by leveraging 21st Century Truck research investment • Unconstrained design potential • Existing programs schedule staged in step with FCS Program FTTS is not a Truck…... It is theObjective Force SustainmentSystem

16. Comments