1 / 46

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION . A Five Part Strategy. Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division. FIVE PART STRATEGY. Manage probationers based on their risk and needs. Engage probationers to change their behavior.

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVECOMMUNITY SUPERVISION A Five Part Strategy Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division

  2. FIVE PART STRATEGY • Manage probationers based on their risk and needs. • Engage probationers to change their behavior. • Provide manageable caseloads and supervision standards. • Implement evidence-based treatment programs. • Provide for quality assurance and measure outcomes.

  3. RISK REDUCTION There is no silver bullet when it comes to changing criminal behavior.

  4. There is a substantial body of sound research that identifies what has worked best in reducing criminal behavior.

  5. RESEARCH FINDINGS • Recidivism can be predicted. • Risk factors for reoffending can be identified. • Recidivism can be reduced.

  6. How Community Supervision Can Reduce Recidivism • Provide intensive community supervision combined with appropriate treatment for high-risk offenders. • Match program intensity to the offenders’ level of risk. • Focus on the offenders’ identified criminogenic needs. • Use structured cognitive-behavioral treatment and incorporate motivational enhancement techniques.

  7. Strategy 1 MANAGE PROBATIONERS BASED ON THEIR RISK AND NEEDS

  8. Research has established that high-risk offenders are less likely to recidivate when they receive more intensive treatment and services.

  9. Risk Level, Treatment Intensity, and Recidivism

  10. To have the greatest impact on recidivism reduction, supervision and treatment resources should focus on high-risk and non-compliant offenders by addressing their identified criminogenic needs.

  11. Criminogenic Needs / Risk Factors • Antisocial peers • Antisocial values / attitudes • Antisocial personality • Antisocial behavior (low self-control) • Family distress • Substance abuse • Employment • Education

  12. Selecting an Assessment Instrument It took CSSD approximately two years to select and fully implement the assessment tools (LSI-R and ASUS-R).

  13. Level of Service Inventory Originally developed in 1982 and revised in 1995, the LSI-R is a validated objective 54 item risk / needs assessment instrument.

  14. LSI-R Subscales

  15. Level of Service Inventory-Revised When scored appropriately, the LSI-R provides 3 basic scores or measures: • A total risk score (risk to recidivate) • A profile of criminogenic need (crime producing risk factors) • A profile of prosocial or protective (protection from crime factors)

  16. ASUS-R A self-report validated assessment that provides insight into a persons’ drug use, emotional state, openness, and readiness to change.

  17. ASUS-R Primary Scales • Drug Involvement • Drug Disruption • Drug Benefits • Social Non-Conforming • Legal Non-Conforming • Mood Adjustment • Defensive • Motivation to Change

  18. CSSDAssessment Validation Study These findings demonstrate the value of the LSI-R and secondarily, the ASUS-R in predicting recidivism. (Bogue, 2007)

  19. 19 year old male 1 prior Adult Conviction Offense: Burglary 3rd Sample Assessment

  20. Sample LSI-R Profile

  21. Sample ASUS-R Profile

  22. Sample Assessment Results LSI-R Total Score: 38 Calculated Sup. Level: High Rec. Substance Abuse Level: Eval. for enhanced treatment

  23. CSSD Present Supervision Levels and Minimum Monthly Contact Standards * * October 2007

  24. Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division PROBATIONER PROGRAM REFERRAL GUIDE NOTE: This information serves as a guideline and, at the discretion of the probation officer, the probationer may be placed in other programs as case circumstances warrant. Specific program locations can be found at http://ares/cssd/Administration/default.aspx

  25. Specialized Assessments • Domestic Violence (DVSI-R) • Women’s Program (SPIN) • Sex Offenders (Static 99, V-RAG, HARE PCL-R, RRASOR, VASOR)

  26. Strategy 2 ENGAGE PROBATIONERS TO CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR

  27. Supervision Focus Beyond short-term offender control, place an emphasis on long-term behavior change.

  28. Enhancing offender motivation to change should be a key component of a recidivism reduction strategy.

  29. Motivation: A Key to Behavior Change Of the 340 probationers in need of treatment, only 32.9% were somewhat or very troubled by their alcohol or drug problems

  30. Enhancing Offender Motivation • Use Motivational Interviewing • Provide assessment feedback • Collaborate on a Case Plan

  31. Strategy 3 PROVIDE MANAGEABLE CASELOADS AND SUPERVISION STANDARDS

  32. Caseload size is directly related to workload which is directly related to the success of community supervision in enhancing public safety and reducing recidivism.

  33. CT Probation Average Caseload Size2000 to 2007

  34. Probationer Distribution by Classification Level * * October 2007

  35. Caseload Targets

  36. Strategy 4 IMPLEMENT EVIDENCE-BASED OR RESEARCH INFORMED TREATMENT PROGRAMS

  37. CSSD Evidence-Based or Research Informed Treatment Interventions • Alternative Incarceration Centers • Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R & R II) • Treating Alcohol & Drug Dependence (TAD) • Adult Behavioral Health Programs • Anger Management for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Client • Matrix Model for Intensive Out-Patient Treatment • Seeking Safety: A Treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse • Helping Women Recover

  38. Strategy 5 PROVIDE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MEASURE OUTCOMES

  39. An evidence-based program designed to reduce recidivism, when poorly implemented, can actually increase recidivism.

  40. Program Integrity and Program Effects

  41. CSSD Quality Assurance Initiatives • Provide comprehensive initial and ongoing training for program providers (2005) • Establish continuous Quality Assurance to maintain treatment fidelity (2006). • Provide staff feedback regarding performance and outcomes.

  42. CSSDPerformance and Outcome Reports • Assessment timeliness • Contact standard compliance • Reductions in risk scores and increases in protective scores • Violation of probation percentage • Employment Status (Intake / Discharge) • Rearrest percentage

  43. SUMMARY

  44. Implementing evidence-based practice to reduce recidivism does not occur quickly nor easily.

  45. How Community Supervision Can Become More Aligned WithEvidence-Based Practices • Affording officers more time to spend with their clients. • Keeping caseloads at manageable levels. • Providing training and ongoing coaching in evidence-based supervision practices.

  46. Implementing and quality assuring evidence-based treatment programs. • Focusing performance measurements and feedback on the quality of work that is linked to an outcome of improved public safety.

More Related