1 / 34

Yeast Cultivation

Yeast Cultivation. Course 27033 BioCentrum-DTU Technical University of Denmark January 2006 By, Marta Karolina Mustafa Shanshan Vijaya Krishna. Introduction. Types of cultivation - Batch - Chemostat – Pulse input Glucose repression Crabtree effect . Batch Cultivation.

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

Yeast Cultivation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Yeast Cultivation Course 27033BioCentrum-DTUTechnical University of DenmarkJanuary 2006By,Marta KarolinaMustafaShanshanVijaya Krishna

  2. Introduction • Types of cultivation - Batch - Chemostat – Pulse input • Glucose repression • Crabtree effect

  3. Batch Cultivation • Cultivation conditions - 4L working volume; pH around 5; 10g/L initial glucose conc.; 10g/L initial galactose conc.; 600rpm; air flow 1 v/v/min; temperature 30˚C - Standard CBS Medium

  4. Yeast Strains • CEN.PK-113-7D (haploid lab strain) as wild type organism - OD600 of shake flask was 2,835 - Inoculum volume was 175 ml • ∆snf1 (CEN.PK-506-1C) as mutant organism - OD600 of shake flask was 2,915 - Inoculum volume was 175 ml

  5. Measurements • Cultivation time was 24h • Samples were taken every hour between t= 0-10 and after 24h • Samples at t= 1-10 and 24 data were taken for OD, pH, CO2, O2, and at t= 4-10 and 24 data were taken for DW • Samples at t= 0-10 and 24 were analyzed by HPLC

  6. Glucose Repression

  7. Crabtree Effect C6H12O6 + O2→ Cells + CO2 (Respiration) C6H12O6→ Cells + CO2 + C2H6O (Fermentation)

  8. Batch Cultivation Results

  9. Method • Two strains one wild-type and one of the glucose repression mutant • Batch cultivation performed in a 5L reactor

  10. Results from CEN-PK-113-7D (WT)

  11. Dynamism of various components

  12. Linear relation - OD vs Dry weight

  13. Gas analysis

  14. m= 0.2172

  15. m= 0.3751

  16. Specific growth rate method m CO2 0.427 DW 0.375 OD 0.217

  17. Ysx=0.3341; Yse=0.369

  18. Result for CEN.PK-506-1C (mutant)

  19. Linear relation - OD vs Dry weight

  20. Gas analysis

  21. Specific growth rate

  22. Specific growth rate method m CO2 0.0063 DW 0.461 OD 0.342

  23. Ysx= 0.0169; Yse= 0.3751

  24. Comparision of Strains

  25. Yields for both the strains

  26. Specific growth rate

  27. Chemostat – Pulse input • Strain used - Wildtype DGI 342 • Pulse of glucose given to a chemostat running at steady state • Conentration of pulse – (2.5g/l glucose and 2.5 g/l galactose) • Samples taken in defined time intervals for 180 minutes for analysis

  28. The filter has a holding volume. • Glucose hydrolysed molecule (C6H12O6.H2O) • Biomass yeild on ethanol - increase in biomass from 150 to 180 min to the decrease in ethanol in the same time interval

  29. Previous Experimental Data D=0.342

  30. So, from the curve fitting, ms = 0.0164; Y_xs_true = 1.83263; So, Y_sx_true = 1/ Y_xs_true = 0.547555 D=0.342

  31. Gas Analysis

  32. Conclusions • No growth was seen on galactose for the mutant strain (∆snf1) – clear sign of the strain unable to use other carbon sources and glucose repression • Glucose repression was obeserved for the wild type as the galactose was utilized only at low concentrations of glucose • The yeild of biomass on glucose is observed to be less for the mutant strain • From the chemostat, for the strain DGI 342(WT), more ethanol is produced because of the crabtree effect because of high dilution rate

More Related