1 / 51

2 nd Call subprojects

2 nd Call subprojects. E-Mob - E-Mobility accelerator SEECA - Strategy for Energy Efficiency through Climate Agreements SILCS - Strategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements TIMBER - Tools for Integrated Management of Biomass Energy Resources TraCit - Transport Carbon Intencities.

Sophia
Download Presentation

2 nd Call subprojects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2nd Call subprojects E-Mob - E-Mobility accelerator SEECA - Strategy for Energy Efficiency through Climate Agreements SILCS - Strategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements TIMBER - Tools for Integrated Management of Biomass Energy Resources TraCit - Transport Carbon Intencities

  2. E-Mobility accelerator: E-Mob Wendy Persoon Brabant Development Agency April 2010

  3. E-Mob: Goal Define common strategy and policy recommendations to accelerate successful market implementation

  4. E-Mob: Approach

  5. Ensuring E-Mob’s legacy Regional Sound boards Regional decision makers and actors Network for future cooperation

  6. Communication Intensive dialogue with relevant industry actors Inform industry and policy parties internal communication

  7. Fit with POWER programme To explore and develop public sector strategies Delivery of low carbon transport Supporting infrastructure

  8. Fit with Interreg 4C Connecting networks Influencing policy

  9. Questions?

  10. “Strategy for Energy Efficiency through Climate Agreements”“SEECA”

  11. “SEECA” A pioneering project submitted by the Uppsala County Administrative Board, Sweden In co-operation with the Niepolomice Municipality in the Malopolska Region,Poland and the Tallinn City Government, Estonia

  12. Lead Partner Mr Frederic Öberg Chairman of the Management team and Mr Göran Albjär Project Manager

  13. Niepolomice Municipality Director: Lord Mayor Roman Ptak and Mr Adam Twardowski Project Manager

  14. Tallinn City Government Director: Mr Arvo Käärd and Mr Aleksander Popel Project Manager

  15. Strategy for Energy Efficiency through Climate Agreements (SEECA)Lead partner 1: Uppsala County Administration Board of Uppsala, Sweden Partner 2: Niepolomice Municipality, Poland Partner 3: Tallinn City Government, Environment Department, Estonia

  16. Important parts of a successful Climate- and Energy workDecreasing greenhouse gases emissions Energy EfficiencyResearch and Development

  17. Climate- and Energy Strategy Decreasing greenhouse Energy Efficiency Research and Development gases emissionsClimate Agreements Universities Planning IT- Energy and Innovation Companies Transports Climate Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant Uppsala Energy Initiative -using warm waste water Renewable energy Local government climate Lifestyle and energy strategies Agricultural and forestry Adaptions Heavy machines Procurements adapted to climate and energy

  18. ”Climate agreements” Municipalities General Business Etc. Municipalities Business associations Organizations Workgroup Basic Agreement - 10 % energy efficiency2012 - further 10 % energy efficiency 2016 - only purchase of ”green cars” from 2010

  19. Arrangement of the SEECA Project • Identification and development of existing climate and energy strategies • Design and Development of ”Climate Agreements” • Eco-driving and good planning when using heavy machines • Communication and Dissemination of the results – Open Days in Brussel

  20. Eco-driving and good planning when using heavy machinesManuals for planning works with heavy maschinesDesign and Development of ”Climate Agreements with owners and users of heavy maschines

  21. Communication and Dissemination of the results – Open Days in Brussel Electric Engine Warm wast water from Forsmark Solar cells Nuclear Power Plant Wave power - Algaea cultivation (oil, biogas) Wind power -Greenhouse cultivation Battery (cladophora) - Fish farming Biogas

  22. SILCSStrategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements

  23. SILCS Partners Noord Brabant – NL Province Noord Brabant Andalucia - Spain EPSA – Empressa Publica de Suelo de Andalucia Seeda - UK CURe – University of Portsmouth KCC – Kent County Council

  24. SILCS Aim Identify and demonstrate effectiveness of low carbon building initiatives within the framework of sustainable developments

  25. SILCS Aim Identify and demonstrate effectiveness of low carbon building initiatives within the framework of sustainable developments Issues: Participation – Involvement of all stakeholders Finance – Approach on total life cycle costs Organisation – Optimal building design process Technology – Most effective systems for LCS

  26. SILCS How Regional Workshops - 2 to 3 days - Workshop information package - Site visit – central theme ie: participation - Debate, charrette & dissemination activity Final Report Effective and successful low carbon approaches for sustainable building projects.

  27. TIMBER!!

  28. TIMBER Tools for Integrated Management of Biomass Energy Resources

  29. Partners Boxtel – Groene Woud (North Brabant) APEC (Andalucía) MEERI Institute (Malopolska) Stockholm County Council (Stockholm) Ngage Solutions (South East England)

  30. Barriers • Enough potential for biomass based energy production, but there are barriers to overcome: • Knowledge barriers • Supply barriers • Demand barriers • Financial barriers

  31. Project set-up • Five workpackages: • WP1 Management and coordination • WP2 Best Practices and Regional Biomass studies • WP3 Development of a Standardized Biomass Energy Model • WP4 Biomass Energy Plans • WP5 Dissemination and involvement of key actors

  32. WP1 – Management and coordination • Establishment of: Project group Steering committee Regional Stakeholder Committee Different ways of communication

  33. WP2 – Best Practices and Regional Biomass Studies • Collection of three best practices per region • Regional studies Groene Woud; A survey of the potential and necessary maximum production capacity at region scale and the impact it has on sustainable regional development goals A location scan A study of possibilities for further expansion An analysis of legal and practical obstacles for implementation as well as solutions for this

  34. WP2 – Best Practices and Regional Biomass Studies • Regional studies Andalucía; Two pre feasibility studies for a large scal biomass plant using vine pruning residues; for the collection of forestry residues and usage in smaller-scale CHP boilers.

  35. WP2 – Best Practices and Regional Biomass Studies • Regional studies Malopolska; • analysis of current resources and possible future potential; • model based problem analysis; • study of the profitability of an investment with various types of fuel used; • comparison of different technical solutions; • assessment of the potential environmental effects using biomass for energy production compared to traditional energy sources; • Study on the implementation of model technical solutions starting from processing biomass at the local level.

  36. WP2 – Best Practices and Regional Biomass Studies • Regional studies Stockholm Region; Analysis of suitable logistic solutions (together with energy companies) Study on logistics of biomass substrates and planning of adequate treatment and production sites for the increasing production of biogas.

  37. WP3 – Development of a standardized Biomass Energy Model • WP3 contains: A study into barriers and possibilities in biomass collection and distribution at the local/regional level; A regional analysis in which treats, chances and solutions for a sustainable implementation for the model are analysed; The ecological, social and economic sustainability of the new model will be looked upon including the potential integration of social groups in production and logistics.

  38. WP4 – Biomass Energy Plans Outcomes of previous WPs integrated in ready-to-implement Biomass Energy Plan (including a businessmodel); Design of a clear integrated management of the supply chain; Uniting stakeholders, engaging key actors and setting out a strategy.

  39. Timetable

  40. TIMBER!!

  41. TraCitTransport Carbon IntenCities

  42. TraCit Partners Estonia Viimsi Municipality, Viimsi Parish Stockholm Environment Institute – Tallinn Poland Cracow University of Technology Seeda - UK CURe – University of Portsmouth

  43. TraCit Aim Identify - Schemes and policies with the potential to reduce carbon intensive travel Support - development, economic growth and sustainability of new and existing urban environments

  44. TraCit Aim Identify - Schemes and policies with the potential to reduce carbon intensive travel Support - development, economic growth and sustainability of new and existing urban environments Integrated approach to sustainable mobility and urban and regional development to determine improved implementation of Low Carbon Transport strategies to the benefit of both.

  45. TraCit How Method - Common approach to measuring travel intensity and carbon audits with respect to CO2 emissions – all scales Pilots - installation design, development & implementation Advice - web environment project updates of key Guide material outputs good practice guidance

More Related