240 likes | 401 Views
Ben Gurion University of the Negev. www.bgu.ac.il/atomchip , www.bgu.ac.il/nanocenter. Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering. Lecturers: Daniel Rohrlich, Ron Folman Teaching Assistants: Daniel Ariad, Barukh Dolgin.
E N D
Ben Gurion University of the Negev www.bgu.ac.il/atomchip,www.bgu.ac.il/nanocenter Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Lecturers: Daniel Rohrlich, Ron Folman Teaching Assistants: Daniel Ariad, Barukh Dolgin Week 1. Special relativity – crisis of the aether • equivalence of inertial reference frames • speed of light as maximum signaling speed • definition of an event • Lorentz transformations • relativity of simultaneity • spacetime 4-vectors • timelike, lightlike and spacelike intervals Sources: Feynman Lectures I, Chap. 15 Sects. 1-7; Tipler and Llewellyn, Chap. 1 Sects. 1-4; פרקים בפיסיקה מודרנית, יחידה 1, פרק 4
Faraday’s law Vector identity Ampère’s law, as modified by Maxwell Gauss’s law in a vacuum: •E = 0 The crisis of the aether Maxwell’s equations (1865) predict that electromagnetic waves (including light waves) travel at speed c in vacuum. The accepted value of c today is 299,792,458m/s.
The crisis of the aether Maxwell’s equations (1865) predict that electromagnetic waves (including light waves) travel at speed c in vacuum. The accepted value of c today is 299,792,458m/s. BUT… this speed is relative to…what? The nineteenth century answer: c is relative to the “aether”. All wave move in a medium: ripples on water, sounds in the air, etc. The aether is the medium for light. We can detect water, air, etc. Can we detect the aether?
The experiment of Michelson and Morley (1887) direction of earth's motion through the “aether” Michelson and Morley rotated the experiment by 90º to cancel experimental errors. D detector D
The experiment of Michelson and Morley (1887) direction of earth's motion through the “aether” Expected path difference: 2(tright+ tleft–tup – tdown) c ≈ 2(vearth /c)2 D = 1 · 10–8 · D = 1 · 10–8 · (2 · 107λ) = 0.2 λ D detector D
The experiment of Michelson and Morley (1887) direction of earth's motion through the “aether” Expected fringe shift (after rotation): 2(tright+ tleft–tup – tdown) c ≈ 2(vearth /c)2 D = 2 · 10–8 · D = 2 · 10–8 · (2 · 107λ) = 0.4 λ D detector Expected fringe shift: 0.4 Observed fringe shift: < 0.02 Result for vearth: vearth < 8 km/s instead of 30 km/s D
The experiment of Michelson and Morley (1887) direction of earth's motion through the “aether” D detector D
If there is no aether, then Maxwell’s electromagnetism and Newton’s mechanics are incompatible!
If there is no aether, then Maxwell’s electromagnetism and Newton’s mechanics are incompatible! Einstein’sbold line of attack was to combine an old principle – relativity, true in Newton’s mechanics – with a new principle: the speed of light c is a universal constant.
Einstein’s first postulate: The equivalence of inertial reference frames Definition: an inertial reference frame is a system of coordinates moving with constant velocity (constant speed and constant direction). Example: the system of coordinates of a passenger in a train that moves at constant velocity is an inertial reference frame. The principle of relativity: The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames.
Einstein’s second postulate: The speed of light is the maximum signaling speed There is a maximum signaling speed, and it is the speed of light c. Since this is a law of physics, the speed of light c is the same in every inertial reference frame. The speed of light is a universal constant.
Einstein’s second postulate: The speed of light is the maximum signaling speed There is a maximum signaling speed, and it is the speed of light c. Since this is a law of physics, the speed of light c is the same in every inertial reference frame. The speed of light is a universal constant. Einstein’s first and second postulates seem incompatible. He was the first to understand that they are not!
Events Definition: an event is any physical process that occurs at a definite time and at a definite point in space.
Relativity of time for two observers, Alice and Bob: First event: flashlight emits flash Second event: flash returns to flashlight These two events define one clock cycle. ☺ cDt/2 L cDt/2 Bob, in his frame, measures time Dt between the two events. The time Dt must obey (cDt/2)2 = (vDt/2)2 + L2 so ►(Dt)2= 4L2/(c2–v2) = (4L2/c2 ) g2 , where g = (1–v2/c2 )–1/2. On the other hand in Alice’s frame, where the time between the events is Dt′, we find: (Dt′)2 = 4L2/c2 (time according to Alice). Thus ►Dt = gDt′. vDt Observer A (Alice), on a train moving with speed v relative to Bob, shines a flashlight at a mirror on the ceiling of the train. Observer B (Bob) is outside on the ground. Note Dt′ < Dt since 1 < g < ∞. So Bob thinks that for Alice, the “light clock” ticks slower. In fact, Bob will conclude that he ages faster while Alice lives longer!
☺ Relativity of length ruler L′ train speed = v L′ – length of ruler in Alice’s “train frame”. In Alice’s frame, the ruler is at rest. What is L (the length of the ruler in Bob’s frame)? “Light measurement” of length in Alice’s frame: L′ = ct1′ and L′ = c(t2′– t1′ ) where t1′ is when the photon hits the right end of the ruler (starting at time 0 for both Alice and Bob) and t2 ′ is when it hits the end it started from. So 2L′ = ct2′. Now, Bob sees Alice and the ruler moving at speed v, so L + vt1 = ct1 and L –v(t2 – t1) = c(t2 – t1). Eliminating t1 we get 2L = (c2 – v2) t2/c . Combining with 2L′ = ct2′, we get L′/L = (t2′ /t2) c2/(c2 – v2) = g2(t2′ /t2). But t2 = gt2′ so ► L = L′ /g (again a consequence of the fact that c is the same in all frames).
Let’s find the “dictionary” (transformation of space-time) for going from one “language” (Alice’s inertial frame) to another (Bob’s inertial frame) while preserving the meaning of the “sentence” (the form of the equations of Nature, e.g. Maxwell’s equations). • Criterion: For any light ray, • (Dx)2 + (Dy)2 + (Dz)2 – c2 (Dt)2 = 0 =(Dx′)2 + (Dy′)2 + (Dz′)2 –c2 (Dt′)2 • If Alice (primed system) moves along the x-axis with velocity v relative to Bob (unprimed system), then • Dx′ = g(Dx – vDt) • Dy′ = Dy • Dz′ = Dz • Dt′ = g(Dt – vDx/c2) Lorentz transformations
And by changing v to –v we obtain the • Dx = g(Dx′ + vDt′) • Dy = Dy′ • Dz = Dz′ • Dt = g(Dt′ + vDx′ /c2) Inverse Lorentz transformations
4-vectors We can write spacetime coordinates as “4-vectors” i.e. Dr= (cDt, Dx, Dy, Dz) where the invariant length of any 4-vector v= (v0, v1, v2, v3) is Lorentz transformation of 4-vector:
4-vectors We can write spacetime coordinates as “4-vectors” i.e. Dr= (cDt, Dx, Dy, Dz) where the invariant length of any 4-vector v= (v0, v1, v2, v3) is Lorentz transformation of 4-vector:
4-vectors We can write spacetime coordinates as “4-vectors” i.e. Dr= (cDt, Dx, Dy, Dz) where the invariant length of any 4-vector v= (v0, v1, v2, v3) is Lorentz transformation of 4-vector:
Timelike, spacelike and light-like 4-vectors Light-like vector: u2 = 0 Timelike vector: u2 < 0 (between causally connected events) Spacelike vector: u2 > 0 (between causally unconnected events) ct future light cone event x past light cone
Experimental tests of time dilation: CERN (1966): muons at speed v = 0.9997c Factor 12 increase in lifetime (2% accuracy in the prediction) Daily life: GPS If we want 30 m accuracy in distance we need 0.1 ms accuracy in time. But a satellite in geosynchronous orbit, moving at a speed of 11,000 km/h ≈ 3000 m/s ≈ 10–5c,loses 4.3 ms per day because of time dilation!