1 / 73

Chapter 12

Chapter 12. Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria. Topics. Overview Methods NPV IRR, MIRR Profitability Index Payback, discounted payback Unequal lives Economic life. Capital Budgeting:. Analysis of potential projects Long-term decisions Large expenditures

abel
Download Presentation

Chapter 12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 12 Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria

  2. Topics • Overview • Methods • NPV • IRR, MIRR • Profitability Index • Payback, discounted payback • Unequal lives • Economic life

  3. Capital Budgeting: • Analysis of potential projects • Long-term decisions • Large expenditures • Difficult/impossible to reverse • Determines firm’s strategic direction

  4. Steps in Capital Budgeting • Estimate cash flows (Ch 13) • Assess risk of cash flows (Ch 13) • Determine r = WACC for project (Ch10) • Evaluate cash flows – Chapter 12

  5. Independent versus Mutually Exclusive Projects • Independent: • The cash flows of one are unaffected by the acceptance of the other • Mutually Exclusive: • The acceptance of one project precludes accepting the other

  6. Cash Flows for Projects L and S

  7. n CFt . ∑ NPV = (1 + r)t t = 0 n CFt ∑ - CF0 NPV = (1 + r)t t = 1 NPV: Sum of the PVs of all cash flows. NOTE: t=0 Cost often is CF0 and is negative

  8. Project S’s NPV

  9. Project L’s NPV

  10. TI BAII+: Project L NPV DisplayYou Enter ' C001000S!# C01100 !# F011 !# C02300 !# F021 !# C03400 !# F031 !# C04600 !# F041 !# ( I 10 !# NPV% 49.18 Cash Flows: CF0 = -1000 CF1 = 100 CF2 = 300 CF3 = 400 CF4 = 600

  11. Rationale for the NPV Method • NPV = PV inflows – Cost • NPV=0 → Project’s inflows are “exactly sufficient to repay the invested capital and provide the required rate of return.” • NPV = net gain in shareholder wealth • Choose between mutually exclusive projects on basis of higher NPV • Rule: Accept project if NPV > 0

  12. NPV Method • Meets all desirable criteria • Considers all CFs • Considers TVM • Can rank mutually exclusive projects • Value-additive • Directly related to increase in VF • Dominant method; always prevails

  13. Using NPV method, which franchise(s) should be accepted? Project S NPV = $78.82 Project L NPV = $49.18 • If Franchise S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because NPVs > NPVL • If S & L are independent, accept both; NPV > 0

  14. Internal Rate of Return: IRR • IRR = the discount rate that forces • PV inflows = cost •  Forcing NPV = 0 • ≈ YTM on a bond • Preferred by executives 3:1

  15. n CFt ∑ = NPV (1 + r)t t = 0 n CFt ∑ = 0 (1 + IRR)t t = 0 NPV vs IRR NPV: Enter r, solve for NPV IRR: Enter NPV = 0, solve for IRR

  16. Franchise L’s IRR

  17. TI BAII+: Project L IRR DisplayYou Enter ' C001000S!# C01100 !# F011 !# C02300 !# F021 !# C03400 !# F031 !# C04600 !# F041 !# ( I 10 !# IRR % 11.79 Cash Flows: CF0 = -1000 CF1 = 100 CF2 = 300 CF3 = 400 CF4 = 600

  18. Decisions on Projects S and L per IRR • Project S IRR = 14.5% • Project L IRR = 11.8% • Cost of capital = 10.0% • If S and L are independent, accept both: IRRS > r and IRRL > r • If S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because IRRS > IRRL

  19. Construct NPV Profiles • Enter CFs in CFLO and find NPVL and NPVS at different discount rates:

  20. NPV Profile

  21. To Find the Crossover Rate • Find cash flow differences between the projects. • Enter these differences in CFLO register, then press IRR. • Crossover rate = 7.17%, rounded to 7.2%. • Can subtract S from L or vice versa • If profiles don’t cross, one project dominates the other

  22. Finding the Crossover Rate

  23. NPV ($) IRR > r and NPV > 0 Accept r > IRR and NPV < 0. Reject r (%) IRR NPV and IRR: No conflict for independent projects

  24. Mutually Exclusive Projects r > 7.2% NPVS> NPVL IRRS > IRRL NO CONFLICT r < 7.2% NPVL> NPVS IRRS > IRRL CONFLICT NPV L IRRS S % 7.2 IRRL

  25. Mutually Exclusive Projects CONFLICT r < 7.2% NPVL> NPVS IRRS > IRRL r > 7.2% NPVS > NPVL IRRS > IRRL NO CONFLICT

  26. Two Reasons NPV Profiles Cross • Size (scale) differences • Smaller project frees up funds sooner for investment • The higher the opportunity cost, the more valuable these funds, so high r favors small projects • Timing differences • Project with faster payback provides more CF in early years for reinvestment • If r is high, early CF especially good, NPVS > NPVL

  27. Issues with IRR • Reinvestment rate assumption • Non-normal cash flows

  28. Reinvestment Rate Assumption • NPV assumes reinvest at r (opportunity cost of capital) • IRR assumes reinvest at IRR • Reinvest at opportunity cost, r, is more realistic, so NPV method is best • NPV should be used to choose between mutually exclusive projects

  29. Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) • MIRR = discount rate which causes the PV of a project’s terminal value (TV) to equal the PV of costs • TV = inflows compounded at WACC • MIRR assumes cash inflows reinvested at WACC

  30. MIRR for Project S: First, find PV and TV (r = 10%)

  31. Second: Find discount rate that equates PV and TV MIRR = 12.1%

  32. Second: Find discount rate that equates PV and TV • PV = PV(Outflows) = -1000 • FV = TV(Inflows) = 1579.5 • N = 4 • PMT = 0 • CPY I/Y = 12.1063 = 12.1% • EXCEL: =MIRR(Value Range, FR, RR)

  33. MIRR versus IRR • MIRR correctly assumes reinvestment at opportunity cost = WACC • MIRR avoids the multiple IRR problem • Managers like rate of return comparisons, and MIRR is better for this than IRR

  34. Normal vs. Nonnormal Cash Flows • Normal Cash Flow Project: • Cost (negative CF) followed by a series of positive cash inflows • One change of signs • Nonnormal Cash Flow Project: • Two or more changes of signs • Most common: Cost (negative CF), then string of positive CFs, then cost to close project • For example, nuclear power plant or strip mine

  35. 0 1 2 r = 10% -800 5,000 -5,000 Enter CFs, enter I = 10 NPV = -386.78 IRR = ERROR Pavilion Project: NPV and IRR?

  36. NPV Profile NPV IRR2 = 400% 450 0 r 100 400 IRR1 = 25% -800 Nonnormal CFs:Two sign changes, two IRRs

  37. Multiple IRRs • Descartes Rule of Signs • Polynomial of degree n→n roots • 1 real root per sign change • Rest = imaginary (i2 = -1)

  38. Logic of Multiple IRRs • At very high discount rates: • The PV of both CF1 and CF2 are low • CF0 dominates • Again NPV < 0 • At very low discount rates: • The PV of CF2 is large & negative • NPV < 0

  39. Logic of Multiple IRRs • In between: • The discount rate hits CF2 harder than CF1 • NPV > 0 • Result: 2 IRRs

  40. The Pavillion Project:Non-normal CFs and MIRR: 1 2 0 -800,000 5,000,000 -5,000,000 RR FR PV outflows @ 10% = -4,932,231.40 TV inflows @ 10% = 5,500,000.00 MIRR = 5.6%

  41. Profitability Index • PI =present value of future cash flows divided by the initial cost • Measures the “bang for the buck”

  42. Project S’s PV of Cash Inflows

  43. Profitability Indexs PV future CF $1078.82 PIS = = Initial Cost $1000 PIS = 1.0788 PIL = 1.0492

  44. Profitability Index • Rule: If PI>1.0  Accept • Useful in capital rationing • Closely related to NPV • Can conflict with NPV if projects are mutually exclusive

  45. Profitability Index • Strengths: • Considers all CFs • Considers TVM • Useful in capital rationing • Weaknesses: • Cannot rank mutually exclusive • Not Value-additive

  46. Payback Period • The number of years required to recover a project’s cost • How long does it take to get the business’s money back? • A breakeven-type measure • Rule: Accept if PB<Target

  47. Payback for Projects S and L

  48. Payback for Projects S and L

  49. Strengths and Weaknesses of Payback • Strengths: • Provides indication of project risk and liquidity • Easy to calculate and understand • Weaknesses: • Ignores the TVM • Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period • Biased against long-term projects • ASKS THE WRONG QUESTION!

  50. Discounted Payback: Use discounted CFs

More Related