1 / 32

Open Innovation 2.0 Lab: Digitising a Paper-Based System Challenge

Join the Open Innovation 2.0 Lab project to collaborate with SMEs across Europe to solve industry challenges and access innovation vouchers. This challenge focuses on creating a mobile app for recording factory observations in real-time to streamline operations.

acurrie
Download Presentation

Open Innovation 2.0 Lab: Digitising a Paper-Based System Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Welcome

  2. Launch: Open Innovation 2.0 LabLive Challenge: Digitising a Paper-Based System Alison Machin & Terry McStea North East Local Enterprise Partnership / RTC North

  3. Overview: Open Innovation 2.0 Lab A collaborative pan-European project designed to offer support for SMEs to harness open-innovation opportunities Working with partners from Greece, Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium, UK Launch industrial challenges set by leading manufacturers Challenge 1 – Automotive sector Challenge 2 - TBC Team North East North East LEP/Innovation SuperNetwork RTC North Funded by Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme

  4. Collaboration Opportunity • OI 2.0 Lab aims to match SMEs from different countries in Europe • To use their complementary skills and knowledge to collaborate to provide solutions to live problems • Produce solutions to innovation challenges set by large manufacturers • Provide access to Innovation Vouchers to support the development process

  5. Test region: Stuttgart!

  6. Test region: North East!

  7. Opportunity to win up €5000 in innovation vouchers to kick start your own cross-border open innovation project • Improve the way you pitch your project to investors and find financing solutions to scale and grow • Access to open innovation expertise and matchmaking services from across Europe from a number of platforms and support services • Expert advice on how to manage your open innovation projects from conceptualisation to completion • Opportunity to open up dialogue with large manufacturers and to provide new, innovative solutions to live industry problems

  8. Challenge 1 Timeline Sep 2019 Apr/May 2019 Apr -Sep 2019 Project work Results & Matching End of projects SMEs have a 5-6 month work window to work up their ideas. SMEs will use the OI Lab platform to collaborate and gain knowledge. Teams to have a report of work submitted mid Sep Successful teams notified of final pitch to NEAA members A dedicated workshop to launch the innovation challenge and share with SME audience. Challenge is now live! Companies register interest to receive info pack Application deadline 31st March 2019 Notify all applicants of outcome. Match the successful applicants with an innovation advisor and an EU partner. Match other applicants with e-services . Evaluation of the work conducted Decision will be made by a board with 2 advisory board members and an industry expert. Nov 2019 Launch event Celebration at VFNE 2019 Final outcome of pilot 1 celebrated at VFNE 2019. Some of the SME’s apply for FinanceCamp 2019 at VFNE

  9. The Innovation Challenge: Digitising a Paper-Based System David Forrest, Nissan

  10. Background There is a requirement for a concern reporting tool that runs on mobile electronic devices to enable factory operators and inspectors to record observations in a user-defined format. The app is intended to be used during periods when new parts are introduced, processes are changed, there are intermittent facility issues or when there is a heightened focus on quality. Benefits of having the app are: • fast data capture • accurate recording of observations • automatic time stamping • eliminates time for data entry (for analysis after the observation period has ended)

  11. Current Condition • Template is created in Microsoft Excel • Paper copies printed and distributed to the shop floor • Operator / Inspector fills in by hand • Completed copies returned to creator and typed into Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet for analysis

  12. The Challenge Propose, design and demonstrate an application that can run on Android and iOS that allows an administrator to quickly create (<5 minutes) a customised concern log that can then be used by an operator or inspector to record information as it is observed.

  13. App Requirements • Administrator creates a custom concern dashboard consisting of the following input types: • Question & Answer format: • Administrator defines the Questions. (i.e. is part X in place?) • User is presented with a number of fields (questions) to answer • a) User can select from multiple choice (administrator defined) • b) User can input text (open ended) • Tally count format: • Administrator defines failure mode types. • The user clicks to register when that fault type is observed. • The user has an option to add additional info (VIN, serial number, etc) • Time stamp requirement for reporting & traceability. • The dashboard format is then locked and the app is run in “user” mode allowing the operator or inspector to input data without changing the format of the log file. • At the end of the observation period the collected data is transferred to a PC, storage location or into a central reporting system database for further analysis.

  14. Example 1: Part Quality Check • Customisable screen • The administrator is able to configure the size, description and colour of the boxes • By pressing each box, the user creates a time based record of each occurrence into a database • Results can be viewed by time, date and attribute • Option to send via email client or export for further analysis Part Quality Check Results Start: 06:00:00 07/11/2018 End: 23:59:59 07/11/2018 NG Scrap (Too Small) NG Rework (Too Small) OK (Within Specification) NG Rework (Too Large) NG Scrap (Too Large) Back Results Edit Back Export to Excel Send Edit Dates 10:27:13 9th November 2018

  15. Example 2: Defect Reporting • Customisable screen • The user is able to input data in text format into fields pre-set by the administrator • Save function creates a time based record of the defect into a database • Option to export data for further analysis Defect Reporting Part Number 12345 XYZ678 Defect Description Part supplied is the wrong colour and does not match the rest of the batch Back Save

  16. Example 3: Fault Tree Diagnosis • Administrator is able to define a fault tree to guide and limit the user in identifying a concern. • User selects through each screen until they reach final level that correctly identifies and categorises the concern • Final concern saves tree history and time based record of the defect into a database for further analysis Fault Tree Diagnosis Model A Model B Model C Model D Back Edit

  17. Factors To Consider

  18. Boundaries:

  19. Over to you….

  20. “The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas” Linus Pauling Your Ideas Don’t assume your first idea is the best one.

  21. Reverse Brainstorming How do I solve this problem ? How could I make this problem worse?

  22. Reverse Brainstorming How can we give our customers the worst experience possible?

  23. Reverse Brainstorming

  24. Collaboration and Sources of Support Dr Martin McGurk RTC North Ltd

  25. Collaboration and Sources of Support • Invite and the OI2Lab • Local Support • Other Networks • Other Sources

  26. Collaboration and Sources of Support • Invite • EEN • NineSigma • Steinbeis • OI2Lab (support systems) • Collaboration space(s) & smart matchmaking • Elearning modules • Access to advisors (for competition winners)

  27. Collaboration and Sources of Support • Local Support • NELEP and the Growth HUB • Intermediaries e.g. RTC North, Innovation SuperNetwork • Trade clusters e.g. NEAA

  28. Collaboration and Sources of Support • Other Networks

  29. Collaboration and Sources of Support • Other Sources e.g. ISO 44001 & ISO 56002 / CEN 16555

  30. Challenge 1 Timeline Sep 2019 Apr/May 2019 Apr -Sep 2019 Project work Results & Matching End of projects SMEs have a 5 month work window to work up their ideas. SMEs will use the OI Lab platform to collaborate and gain knowledge. Teams to have a report of work submitted mid Sep Successful teams notified of final pitch to NEAA members A dedicated workshop to launch the innovation challenge and share with SME audience. Challenge is now live! Companies register interest to receive info pack Application deadline 31st March 2019 Notify all applicants of outcome. Match the successful applicants with an innovation advisor and an EU partner. Match other applicants with e-services . Evaluation of the work conducted Decision will be made by a board with 2 advisory board members and an industry expert. Nov 2019 Launch event Celebration at VFNE 2019 Final outcome of pilot 1 celebrated at VFNE 2019. Some of the SME’s apply for FinanceCamp 2019 at VFNE

  31. james.craft@rtcnorth.co.uk alison.machin@nelep.co.uk

More Related