400 likes | 600 Views
Colorado Climate Project Tom Easley Director of Programs The Rocky Mountain Climate Organization easley@ rockymontainclimate.org. the. ROCKY . MOUNTAIN. CLIMATE. Organization. Our mission: Spreading the word about what climate disruption can do to us here and what we can do about it.
E N D
Colorado Climate ProjectTom EasleyDirector of ProgramsThe Rocky Mountain Climate Organizationeasley@rockymontainclimate.org
the ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLIMATE Organization Our mission: Spreading the word about what climate disruption can do to us here and what we can do about it.
RMCO’s 44 partners: Local governments: City and County of Denver Boulder County City of Aurora City of Fort Collins City of Boulder La Plata County Summit County
Local governments, continued: City of Louisville Town of Vail City of Aspen Town of Silverthorne Town of Breckenridge Town of Dillon Town of Frisco Town of Telluride
Local governments, continued: Town of Winter Park Water Provider: Denver Water Businesses: Aspen Skiing Company BP America Brown and Caldwell
Businesses, continued: Continuum Partners EcoBuild Gifford Ewing Photography Holland & Hart Intrawest Colorado New Belgium Brewing Company Renewable Energy Choices RBI Strategy & Research
Businesses, continued: Roche Colorado Sun Electric Systems Vail Resorts Westcliffe Publishers Wild Oats Natural Markets Wright Water Engineers
Nonprofit organizations: Audubon Colorado Boulder Community Hospital Colorado Association for Recycling Colorado Association of Ski Towns Colorado Conservation Trust National Wildlife Federation Nature Conservancy of Colorado Rocky Mountain Farmers Union
Nonprofit organizations, continued: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Western Resource Advocates
Our motivation: This is a special place to live, work, and play. Let’s keep it that way.
The Colorado Climate Project Bringing Coloradans together to reduce our contributions and our vulnerabilities to climate change.
The Colorado Climate Project Patterned after state government projects (including Arizona, New Mexico, Montana) Differences: Undertaken by a nonprofit organization. Addressing vulnerability and adaptation, especially with respect to water.
We face a choice here between a bleaker and a better future. Left unchecked, climate disruption here will mean: More heat Less snow Less available water More drought
Observed Annual Temperature Anomaly 2000-2006 Impact #1: More Heat Source: Dr. Martin Hoerling, NOAA
Projected Change in Annual Temperature 2035-2060 Impact #1: More Heat Source: Dr. Martin Hoerling, NOAA
Impact #1: More Heat Rocky Mountain Climate Organization analysis of NOAA data
Projected Change in Palmer Drought Index 2035-2060 Impact #4: More Drought Source: Dr. Martin Hoerling, NOAA
At the same time, Colorado’s need for water is projected to increase by 53% by 2030. Statewide Water Supply Initiative Colorado Department of Natural Resources
Case Study: Colorado River A recent “best-case” projection of climate-change impacts in the Colorado River basin: By 2010-2039 -- 1.8ºF more heat. (Modest increase!) 24% less snow. 3% less precipitation. 36% less water storage. Christensen at al., in Climatic Change(2004)
A Better Future The Colorado Climate Project: Goal: Reduce Colorado’s contribution and vulnerability to climate change. What we do here matters. Compared to the world’s 212 nations, Colorado emits more carbon dioxide from fossil fuels than 174 nations do. Plus we have a lot at stake!
Colorado Climate Project Meetings from Nov. 2006 – Sept. 2007. Emissions inventory and forecast. Cost-benefit analysis and technical support from Center for Climate Strategies. Open, public process. No pre-determined outcomes.
Project Directors John Hickenlooper, Democratic mayor of Denver Steve Burkholder, Republican mayor of Lakewood Doug Hutchinson, Republican mayor of Fort Collins Tom Long, Republican county commissioner, Summit County
Project Directors, continued Matt Baker, Environment Colorado Gary Hart, CU-Denver Gail Klapper, Colorado Forum Al Yates, Colorado State University (retired)
Climate Action Panel 34 members, including 3 co-chairs: Joe Broz, vice president, Midwest Research Institute (NREL) Eric Kuhn, manager, Colorado River Water Conservation District Dan McClendon, manager, Delta-Montrose Electric Association
Policy Work Groups • Comprised of Climate Action Panel members and an additional 70 people: • Energy Supply • Residential/Commercial/Industrial • Transportation/Land Use • Agriculture/Forestry/Waste • Cross-Cutting Issues • Water Adaptation
Climate Action Panel Decisions reached September 12. Final analysis and write-up to be completed. Project Directors reviewed for approval. Presentation to state government, local governments, utilities, water providers, others.
Panel Recommendations • 70 recommendations: • 55 to reduce greenhouse gases • 15 to prepare for and deal with changes. • 61 unanimous approval • 7 super-majority approval • 2 simple majority approval
Panel Recommendations • Statewide emission reduction goals: • To be set by the Governor • “In the vicinity of” 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 80% below 2005 levels by 2050 • 2020 goal equals 37% below projected levels in 2020
Panel Recommendations • 55 recommendations to reduce emissions: • 33 analyzed quantitatively: • Would achieve 3/4 of the 2020 goal • 30 analyzed for cost-effectiveness: • Would save about $2.6 billion by 2020
Panel Recommendations • Increase Renewable Portfolio Standard to 30% for investor-owned utilities and 15% for cooperatives and municipal utilities. • New power plants and those 60 years old must be as clean as new natural gas plant. • Reduce emissions in oil & gas operations. • Programs and incentives to reduce consumer energy use 1% per year • Establish inverted block rates
Panel Recommendations • Reduce energy use in state and local government buildings. • Upgrade state energy code for new construction. • Achieve beyond-code reductions in energy use in new construction. • Expand renewable energy use. • Smart growth land use planning • Mass transit expansion
Panel Recommendations • Adoption of California emission limits for new cars and trucks. • Low-carbon standard for vehicle fuels. • Incentives for ethanol and biodiesel production. • Forest thinning used for energy production. • Comprehensive local government plans. • Education and outreach for voluntary actions.
Panel Recommendations Waste Management Recommendations: • Source reduction, enhanced recycling, and composting programs • Divert 75% of wastes from landfilling by 2020 • Education and public involvement • Technical assistance • Economic support • Possible increased landfill surcharges
Panel Recommendations Waste Management Recommendations: • Landfill methane reduction programs • Reduce methane emissions 50% from BAU by 2020, • Gas to energy projects, flaring, source reduction • Methane reduction plans for each landfill, with state technical/financial assistance
The Colorado Climate Project More information: www.coloradoclimate.org www.rockymountainclimate.org easley@rockymountainclimate.org