1 / 40

Report from

( ). *. ( ) still a conventional name !. *. Report from. A. Passeri. Expression of Interest Physics goals Detector developments Collaboration setup. http://www.lnf.infn.it/lnfadmin/direzione/KLOE2-LoI.pdf. 72 physicists. 12 institutions. Expression of Interest.

ady
Download Presentation

Report from

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ( ) * ( )still a conventional name ! * Report from A. Passeri • Expression of Interest • Physics goals • Detector developments • Collaboration setup A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  2. http://www.lnf.infn.it/lnfadmin/direzione/KLOE2-LoI.pdf 72 physicists 12 institutions A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  3. Expression of Interest • Vast physics program both at the f peak and in the range 1< s < 2.5 GeV • RequireʃLdt 50 fb-1in a 34 years running period at the f peak • (i.e. 5 x 1010 KSKL events and 7.5 x1010 K+K- events), • in order to reach significant sensitivities for the study of neutral kaon • interferometry, KS rare decays, lepton universality test and h, h’ program. • Require to run also at higher energies to accomplish the multihadronic cross • section measurement and the gg program. Energy scan highly recommended, • with average L∼1032cm-2s-1 . • Expect to start experimental program in 2011 • Plan to use the KLOE detector with some important upgrades A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  4. Physics goals at the f peak Kaon physics: KS rare decays  pen, pmn, 3p0, p+p-p0,p0l+l- … Study neutral kaon interference: search for CPT violation, quantum decoherence, EPR phenomena, test Bell’s inequality. Improve, where possible, all KLOE BR measurements  Vus Search for LFV effects in Ke2 decays h, h’ physics: extensive cPT tests, very sensitive to hadron structure, light quark masses and couplings: h(h’)3p , h’hpp Radiative decays: h(h’)gg, p+p-g, p+p-e+e- , hp0gg C,CP violation: hpp, ggg, p0p0g,p0l+l-h’l+l-h • Light scalars: Investigate the nature of the established scalars f0(980), a0(980) • measure their s-quark couplings via f(f0+a0)gKKg • Search for the controversial lighter scalars s(600) and K*(800) • via gg process. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  5. Physics goals in the region 1≤s≤ 2.5 GeV Hadronic cross section: Provide R measurement for am and aem determination. Perform an accurate energy scan. Improve by a factor of 10 the present BABAR exclusive cross section measurements. Afford the only inclusive shad measurement since ’80s. Vector meson spectroscopy: study r, , f recurrencies and their place in hadron multiplets. Understand the nature of r(1900) (glueball?). gg physics: Study h’, f0, a0 production and their gg width (related to the quark structure of the hadron). The program is wide and spread over many topics. All together they offer a rich experimental field. In the following I will briefly discuss mainly the kaon part. The rest will be addressed in C.Bini’s talk. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  6. G(K  pℓn(g))  |Vus f+K0p-(0) |2 I(lt) SEW(1 + dEM + dSU(2) ) The KLOE heritage: Vus CKM matrix unitarity test can be refined by 1 order of magnitude. |Vud|2 + |Vus|2 + |Vub|2~ |Vud|2 + |Vus|2  1 – D = 0.9997 ± 0.0013 Presently: Vud from superallowed Fermi transition Vus dominated by KLOE measurements of K semileptonic decays: Precision limited by hadronic corrections KLOE does alsoextract |Vus| from (K())/(()) ratio. Precision limited by the theoretical uncertainity on the fK/f evaluation. Recent progress in lattice QCDseems to open the possibility of lowering the theoretical uncertainty to ∼0.1% Considering the actual KLOE performances and assuming that systematics will scale with statistics, a factor of 100 more statistics is needed to match the theoretical precision, i.e. 40 fb-1 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  7. Lepton universality test In extended SUSY models large contributions to Ke2 decay are expected from LFV terms: First studies are going on in KLOE: need to fully exploit calorimeter for e/m separation. A reasonable guess, based on present detector, is that 50 fb-1 would push relative error around 0.5%. But : efficiency could improve dramatically with an increased calo granularity and with a better inner tracking stage. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  8. CPT violation tests Violation expected in QG models. No obvious scale predictions. • The f-factory environment provides a unique opportunity to test the • existence of such effect, in 3 different ways: • The comparison of KS and KL semileptonic decay charge asymmetries • Via the Bell-Steinberger relation • By studying the quantum interference between entangled kaon pairs • produced in f decays. This is also allow to perform tests of quantum • coherence, EPR paradox and Bell’s inequality. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  9. CPTV I : KS semileptonic decayasymmetry _ G(KS,L  p-e+n) - G(KS,L  p+e-n) AS,L = _ G(KS,L  p-e+n) + G(KS,L  p+e-n) CPT in mixing CPT in decay S Q and CPT CP AS  AL  0 implies CPT AS= 2(ReK ReK Re b/a Re d*/a) AL = 2(Re K Re K Re b/a Re d*/a) Present results: AL KTeV-’02 AS KLOE 400pb-1 With a 50 fb-1 sample: s(AS)∼10-3 But:acceptance can be increased up to a factor of 2 just by lowering the B field A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  10. CPTV II : Bell-Steinberger relation From unitarity conditions: Im(d) ≠ 0 can be only due to CPTV, unitarity violation or exotic states. After KLOE measurement of BR(KS3p0) : Im(d) = (1.2 ±3.0) 10-5 The next limiting inputs to B.S. are h+- and h00 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  11. f1 t1 t2 KS,L f KL,S Dt=t1- t2 f2 CPTV III :Quantum interference • interference pattern I(Dt) for different final • states f1,f2 give access to different parameters • a good vtx resolution is required: s(Dt)<tS •  quest for an improvement of inner tracking! • several QG models predict CPTV terms in the • interference time evolution I(Dt) f1,f2 = p±l∓n large Dt: Semileptonic decays give access to dK small Dt: Dt/tS A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  12. Generic quantum decoherence (which can also signal CPTV) is introduced via • a parameter z . KLOE already measured: • 50fb-1 more would reduce error by 10. • In the EHNS model the interference pattern contains 3 CPTV parameters: • a, b, g∼ o (MK2/MPlanck) ∼ 10-20 GeV KLOE measurements still worse than CPLEAR KLOE2 figure of merit: constant line is CPLEAR VDET means svtx∼tS/4 • in BMP model CPTV modifies the concept • of antiparticle and KSKL state deviates from • Bose statistics via a parameter : Preliminary KLOE measurement is already at 10-4 level. KLOE2 can go up to 10-5 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  13. Rare KS decays BR(KSpen)is still the limiting factor in the test of DS=DQ rule by 3 error reduction on Re(x+)provided systematics scales with stat BR(KSpmn) same as the above, but more difficult. Expected error at 0.4%. BR(KSgg) test of cPT at o(p4). NA48 measurement 30% apart from calculations. Current error is 2.7%. KLOE2 can go below 1% BR(KSp+p-p0) another test of cPT, predictions around 10-7. KLOE2 expected precision around 15%. Would benefit from B field reduction. BR(KS3p0) CP and CPT test. Expected at 10-9, present limit at 10-7. KLOE2 can aim to observe the signal. BR(KSp0l+l-) very important to evaluate the CPV via mixing contribution to the rare analogous decay of KL. Present NA48 measurement based on 7+6 events. With conservative efficiency estimate KLOE2 expects to perform a measurement at the same level. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  14. R measurement and energy scan Hadronic contribution to aem(MZ) is very important in the region 1<s<2.5 GeV If not measuredat few % levelis going to be the limiting factor for future precision calculation (linear collider physics). B factories are already doing it ! Radiative return with 2 fb-1 at 2.4 GeV Energy scan 20 pb-1 per point BABAR now BABAR full stat KLOE2 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  15. The KLOE detector EmC DC Lead/scintillating fiber 4880 PMTs 98% coverage of solid angle 4 m diameter × 3.75 m length 90% helium, 10% isobutane 12582/52140 sense/total wires All-stereo geometry E/E = 5.7% / E(GeV) t = 54 ps / E(GeV)  50 ps (finite bunch-length contribution subtracted) p/p = 0.4 % (tracks with  > 45°) = 150 m z = 2 mm solenoidal 0.5 T magnetic field A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  16. Calorimeter: Drift Chamber: Full angular coverage Good momentum resolution Large tracking volume Exceptional timing capabilities Minimization of materials Large lever arm The KLOE concept: Excellent e/ separation based on t.o.f. Good 0 reconstruction capabilities Full kinematical reconstruction of events The focus in KLOE design was mainly on efficiency for long-lived particles (K± ,KL), but the detector provides as well acceptable efficiency and resolution for prompt particles. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  17. KLOE detector “weaknesses” for DAFNE2 physics: • KLOE ( K LONG Experiment) was not fully optimized to detect low momentum tracks coming from IP (KS, h decay products) • Tracking starts at 25 cm from IP: both tracking and vertex efficiency affected • Calorimeter readout granularity does not prevent cluster merging and is not sufficient for a a shower-shape pid. • at f peak, gg physics impossible without small angle e± tagger • Physics and background rate could be an issue for DAQ and trigger Proposed upgrades: • Lower B field from 0.5 T to 0.3 T (at least at f peak) • Add an inner tracker at 10< R < 25 cm • refine calorimeter readout granularity • Small Angle Tagger for gg events placed downstream • Trigger and DAQ upgrades A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  18. 5 KGauss 4 Kgauss 3 KGauss Muon momentum in K± CM (MeV) p(MeV) B field (KGauss) B field: from 5  3 KGauss ? • Increase acceptance for low momentum tracks • coming from I.P. • Reduction of spiralizing tracks  less tails in • momentum resolution KSp+p-p0 Simulated Km2 events Drawback:sp worsening for tracks at higher pT (>150 MeV/c) • However:other effects, depending on the • channel, may partially compensate • According to simulation 40% B field reduction produce only a 15% sp increase in Km2 events A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  19. Inner tracker: requirements • It must start at R≥ 20 tS , to avoid spoiling the KSKL interference path • To maximize acceptance it must extend up to q=30o • It must be able to provide independent tracking, i.e. must measure at least • 4 or 5 3D-spatial points. • It must be very light, not to spoil sP: a total material ∼1% X0 is acceptable • hit resolution: lS is only upper limit from physics… but for independent • tracking we must ensure that contribution to sP is better than M.S. •  shit∼200 mm is enough for 10 cm track length • it must sustain a very high rate: extrapolation from KLOE machine • background monitors yields a pessimistic figure od 3040 hits /plane/ms • easy: using straw tubes layers. Very light. • Electronics and mechanics “standard”. • challenging: cylindrical GEM. Expertise exists at LNF, • but detector shape is totally new. considered solutions: A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  20. Courtesy of G.Bencivenni Conversion & Principle of operation of a GEM detector The GEM (Gas Electron Multiplier) (F.Sauli, NIM A386 (1997) 531) is a thin (50mm) metal coated kapton foil, perforated by a high density of holes (70 mm diameter, pitch of 140 mm)  standard photo-lithographic technology. By applying 400-500 V between the two copper sides, an electric field as high as ~100 kV/cm is produced into the holes which act as multiplication channels for electrons produced in the gas by a ionizing particle. Gains up to 1000 can be easily reached with a single GEM foil. Higher gains (and/or safer working conditions) are usually obtained by cascading two or three GEM foils. LHCb GEM configuration A Triple-GEM detector is built by inserting three GEM foils between two planar electrodes, which act as the cathode and the anode. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  21. LNF Detector Development Group F.Anulli, G.Bencivenni, D.Domenici, G.Felici, F.Murtas Cylindrical GEM development • The basic cylindrical structure can be realized with the straw-tube technology • The cylinder is obtained winding a parallelogram-shaped kapton foil. A helicoidal joint line (~3 mm wide) is left: • Two consecutive cylindrical electrodes have opposite “helicity” in order to reduce the overlap of joint lines to only one point (~3x3 mm2). • A detector layer is composed by five concentric cylindrical structures: • the cathode, the 3 GEM foils, the readout anode. • Anode and GEM3-down (where only electron fast signals are • present) are equipped with U-V strip readout for stereo view. • Strip pitch is 400 mm. • The cylindrical electrodes are glued at the ends on circular • frames, by which the detector can be hung to the beam • pipe, avoiding any internal support frame First prototype for mechanical test successfully produced A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  22. GEM vs KLOE2 requirements : • Cylindrical GEM can be assembled in 5 detector layers at 10<R<25 cm • providing 3D spatial measurements for a total surface of 33000 cm2and • 27000 readout channels (for a 400 mm pitch). • Hit resolution around 170 mm. • Thickness grand total for 5 layers: between 0.92% and 1.57% X0 • (depending on copper coat thickness). • Sustainable rate up to 50 MHz/cm2 (measured in planar GEM). • Time resolution ∼45 ns. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  23.  Data MC KS 30 80 60 40 20  0 0 10 20 30 40 Calorimeter readout granularity: why refine it ? Avoid cluster splitting…. …and merging …and on top of that.. Improve e/m/p separation via cluster shape variables 6 g events After kinematic fit c2 cut Started a detailed calorimeter simulation based on FLUKA mc: • lead foils, including 5% Bi • glue Bicron BC-600ML, in all components • individual fibers: • polystirene core + PMMA cladding A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  24. Standard KLOE calorimeter behaviour well reproduced for photons: sE/E sz Energy and spatial resolutions compared to measured ones FLUKA ….. Data resol Eg (MeV) Eg (MeV) Cluster depth and rms compared to p+p- g events centroid rms (cm) centroid depth (cm) Eg (MeV) Eg (MeV) A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  25. planes (depth) Columns () Granularity tests with 1000 events with two 200 MeV electrons preliminary 4.4x4.4cm2 Digitized cells KLOE granularity Generated energy release Energy 2x2cm2 1x1cm2 KLOE granularity x 16 KLOE granularity x 4 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  26. planes (depth) Columns () Granularity tests with 1000 events with two 200 MeV muons Digitized cells KLOE granularity 4.4x4.4cm2 preliminary Generated energy release Energy 2x2cm2 1x1cm2 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  27. Calorimeter granularity refinement: how to implement it ? • Still a lot of work to do with simulation and comparison to KLOE data • Light readout could be performed with multi-anode PM tubes, like • Hamamatsu R7600-00M4 or 00M16, having very good risetime and • QE similar to present PMs.Sample of such devices already purchased, • to be tested very soon. • Light guides should be replaced with smaller ones: not an easy job ! • Prototyping and testing is mandatory • Granularity could be refined only on first 1 or 2 planes, and eventually only • in the barrel region. • FEE should be redesigned for the new cells, while old cells FEE boards can • be used as spares for the remaining ones. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  28. Trigger considerations Simple rate scaling shows that KLOE2 Must work well above 10 KHz total rate, depending on machine bckg • DAFNE DANAE •  events300 Hz2500 Hz • Good Bhabhas600 Hz5000 Hz • Residual cosmics600 Hz600 Hz • Machine backgr.500 Hz ? • If machine bckg does not increase dramatically, present minimum bias • trigger strategy (2 hw lvls + 1 sw) can be mantained, with Bhabha prescaling ON. • The 3rd level filter must become more selective, to minimize the fraction of • non-interesting events on tape. • Most of the present trigger custom boards (11 diferent types) need to be • designed, for lack of spares and components obsolescence • DC trigger need to be reconsidered: actual thresholds are not easily under • control, and may change trigger conditions unexpectedly. • A gg physics trigger must be included • At high energy multiplicity will increase: trigger should be even more efficient. • However threshold tuning will be necessary. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  29. DAQ at KLOE2 • KLOE DAQ was designed to sustain 50 Mbyte/s and was tested up to • 80 Mbyte/s , divided between 10 similar acquisition chains. • Its architecture can be kept, provided we overcome 3 bottlenecks : • VME block transfer from 2nd lvl concentrator to CPU, limited at 20 Mbyte/s •  VME64x protocol, together with the new 2eSST block transfer (Double-edge • Source Syncronous Block Transfer) can transmit up to 320 Mbyte/s ! • FDDI data transfer from 2nd lvl CPUs to onlinefarm, limited at 12.5 Mbyte/s •  can be replaced by Gigabit Ethernet • 2nd lvl CPUs (old DEC) data framing, limited around 8 Mbyte/s • Motorola MVME6100 implements both VME64 and Gigabit Ethernet A tester board has been realized to test the full environment. MVME6100 running Linux with a custom vme driver and the KLOE online sw. Measured sustained rate is 180 Mbyte/s Aloisio,Branchini,Cevenini,Izzo,Loffredo,Lomoro A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  30. Setup of the collaboration For the moment : 72 physicists in 12 institutions Out of which: 44 are italians 4 are italians 41 are also in KLOE 7 are also in KLOE Doors are open to newcomers who share the same physics program • By end of june a KLOE2 full meeting is planned to: • start giving the collaboration a governing structure • define together the next milestones and start sharing working items A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  31. Conclusions A sizeable group of experimental physicists has expresses interest in a wide physics program to be performed at the next Frascati e+e- collider, both at the f peak and at higher energy We plan to use the KLOE detector with some important upgrades, for which we have already started developments. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  32. Spare Slides A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  33. Slopes l+ = 0.02534(30) l+ = 0.00128(3) (Pole model: KLOE, KTeV, and NA48 ave.) l0 = 0.01587(95) (KTeV and Istra+ ave.) From unitarity • f+(0)=0.961(8) • Leutwyler and Roos Z. • [Phys. C25, 91, 1984] • Vud=0.97377(27) • Marciano and Sirlin • [Phys.Rev.Lett.96 032002,2006] Vus×f+(0) = 0.2187(22) Vus from KLOE results (BR’s and tL) c2/dof = 1.9/4 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  34. Vus f+(0) plot: F.Mescia courtesy From unitarity • f+(0)=0.961(8) • Leutwyler and Roos Z. • [Phys. C25, 91, 1984] • Vud=0.97377(27) • Marciano and Sirlin • [Phys.Rev.Lett.96 032002,2006] Vus×f+(0) = 0.2187(22) Vus and Unitarity • tL = 50.99(20) ns, • average KLOE-PDG • Including all new measurements • for semileptonic kaon decays • (KTeV, NA48, E865, and KLOE) <Vus×f+(0)>WORLD AV. = 0.2164(4) A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  35. The Vus- Vud plane Inputs: Vus = 0.2254  0.0020 Kl3 KLOE, using f+(0)=0.961(8) Vud = 0.97377  0.00027 Marciano and Sirlin Phys.Rev.Lett.96 032002,2006 Vus/Vud = 0.2294  0.0026 Km2 KLOE (K())/(())  |Vus|2/|Vud|2fK2/f2 unitarity Fit results, P(c2) = 0.66: Vus = 0.2246  0.0016 Vud = 0.97377  0.00027 Fit result assuming unitarity, P(c2) = 0.23: Vus = 0.2264  0.0009 A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  36. Ke2 Momentum distribution Red = MC blu = ke2 black data • We use as starting point a sample of 80000 K+e2 corresponding to 2fb statistic. (IB+SD) • MC 2005 was used with the new charged kaon noise inserted • The K+ decay must be reconstructed with vertex in FV • The electron momentun ranges in 200-300 MeV/c region. Same as the muons from K2 Lab momentum SD Mev/c A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  37. p/p p/p pions,muons electrons Silicon 1.5mm muons Silicon 1.5mm muons silicon 1mm silicon 1mm 1% 1% KLOE KLOE P (MeV/c) P (MeV/c) Multiple scattering vs thickness Comparison between MS induced by 2 reference value of silicon thickness (1mm and 1.5 mm) wrt a KLOE-like:≈ 700m of carbon fiber. A thickness larger than 1mm of silicon equivalent (≈ 1% of X0) can be a limiting factor for the momentum mesurement of low momentum particle coming from IP . Problem can also be given by the conversion of photons from machine A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  38. R O C K R O C K R O C K DATA CONCENTRATOR Level 2 Level 1 16 DAQ FEE boards Trigger V I C AUX bus C P U TS+FIO C-bus Trigger lines VIC VME bus VME bus Vic bus R O C K M F D D I V I C C P U V I C Trigger lines DAQ Chain AUX bus A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  39. In KLOE the link and the switch between fee and farm is based on FDDI IT MUST BE CHANGED A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

  40. A.Passeri: KLOE-2 Report

More Related