210 likes | 341 Views
Space Radiation Operations Status, Methods and Needs. Neal Zapp, NASA/JSC SRAG. Space Radiation. A Fundamental Problem for NASA’s. Manned. Spaceflight. Objectives. •. Legal, moral and practical considerations require . NASA limit. postflight. risks incurred by humans living .
E N D
Space Radiation OperationsStatus, Methods and Needs Neal Zapp, NASA/JSC SRAG
Space Radiation A Fundamental Problem for NASA’s Manned Spaceflight Objectives • Legal, moral and practical considerations require NASA limit postflight risks incurred by humans living and working in space to “acceptable” levels • Radiation protection is essential to enable humans to live and work safely in space • Astronaut radiation protection is addressed as part of the NASA Strategic Plan
Radiation ExposurePrincipal Health Risks • Acute affects – of PRIMAR • Affects potentially range from mild and recoverable to death • Much higher risk for exploration than for STS/ISS/LEO • Long-term risks • Cancer risk increase • Cataracts • Increase in cancer risk is principal concern for astronaut exposure to space radiation for ISS • For exploration acute effects/syndromes become much more an operational possibility
NASA Mission Support Team:Space Radiation Analysis Group • Provide preflight crew exposure projections • Provide real-time astronaut radiation protection support • Provide radiation monitoring to meet medical and legal requirements • Small group of health physicists, physicists, and programmers • 4 civil servants • 7-8 contractors
SRAG Real-TimeFlight Support • Man console in Mission Control Center-Houston (MCC-H) 4 hr/day during nominal conditions • Man console in MCC-H continuously during significant space weather activity and all EVA's
Space EnvironmentSupport Teams • NOAA Space Environment Center/Space Weather Operations (NOAA SWO) • Principle organization for providing space weather support to civilian customers • Space weather equivalent to National Weather Service
Measurements • Archival • Environment characterization • Crew medical record input • Crew and area monitors – TLD, OSL, and CR-39 • TLD < 10keV/micron < CR-39 • Operational or real-time • Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter • Charged particle spectroscopy • Intravehicular (IV-CPDS) • Extravehicular (EV-CPDS, multi-axis) • IP monitoring
Results--Individual RAM Exposure Rates Relative to Vehicle Average SM SleepStations Lab Window Airlock Near CWCsin Node Aft End of SM,Near Treadmill TeSS
Vehicle Shielding Additions ISS: US LAB
Exploration • Requirements Generation • Crew exposure limits • Vehicle design limits (human exposure) – SPE driven • Measurements – mission phase / type • Mass, time, complexity, budgetary constraints, etc.
Design of Orion “HOT” “COOL” August 22nd, 2006 Bob Rutledge, NASA JSC
Final Thoughts • Must assume that the question of mission and/or crew safety impact of space weather operations is a “when”, not an “if”. • Highest risk mission element is surface EVA • Operations depends on monitoring and forecasting • Measuring and understanding the space weather environment (dynamics) is a direct enabler of space exploration. • Today’s climate dictates a blurring of the lines between “research” and “operations” as applied to space weather.