1 / 49

The Etiology of Alcohol Use Disorders

The Etiology of Alcohol Use Disorders. Kenneth J. Sher, Ph.D. Emily Grekin, Ph.D. University of Missouri-Columbia and the Midwest Alcoholism Research Center. Support of authors. Research NIAAA (NIH) Professional Consulting/Reviewing NIH

agatha
Download Presentation

The Etiology of Alcohol Use Disorders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Etiology of Alcohol Use Disorders Kenneth J. Sher, Ph.D. Emily Grekin, Ph.D. University of Missouri-Columbia and the Midwest Alcoholism Research Center

  2. Support of authors • Research • NIAAA (NIH) • Professional Consulting/Reviewing • NIH • Approximately one dozen academic institutions and research centers • Alcoholic Beverage Medical Research Foundation • Joint Defense Group (alcohol industry sponsored legal defense) • Investments • No individual equity position in biotech or health-care related companies (either public or private) • Mutual funds may, and often do, have positions in biotech and health care stocks

  3. Topics to Be Reviewed • Definitions of alcohol-related constructs • Epidemiology of alcohol use, problems, and dependence • Importance of life course and developmental perspectives • Presumed etiological mechanisms • Individual differences in susceptibility • Environmental factors • Towards an integrated perspective

  4. Definitions of Alcohol-related Constructs • Consumption-based measures • Frequency, quantity, and Q-F • Frequency of heavy drinking • Problematic alcohol involvement • Alcohol-related consequences • Alcohol dependence syndrome • DSM-IV alcohol use disorders • Alcohol dependence • Alcohol abuse

  5. DSM-IV Dependence Criteria • Tolerance • Withdrawal • Using in larger amounts/over a longer time period than intended • Persistent desire to cut down/control • Great deal of time spent obtaining/using/recovering • Important activities given up/reduced • Continued drinking despite physical/psychological problems that are caused/exacerbated by alcohol

  6. DSM-IV Abuse Criteria • Failure to fulfill major role obligations • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations • Recurrent alcohol-related legal problems • Continued drinking despite social/interpersonal problems that are caused/exacerbated by alcohol • Criteria for alcohol dependence not met

  7. Problems with the AUD Definitions • Polythetic criteria • Diagnostic orphans • Diagnostic imposters • Continuum or categories

  8. Alcohol Use and AUDs in the Population • Importance of epidemiologic data • Framing the problem • Providing etiological clues • Data from NESARC (2002) • Prevalence of use • Prevalence of heavy drinking • Prevalence of AUDs

  9. Epidemiology of Use and Abstention Percent

  10. Epidemiology of Heavy Use Heavy Use Women: > 1 drink / day Men: > 2 drinks / day Percent

  11. 12-mo. Prevalence of DSM-IV AUD Diagnoses Men Women

  12. Epidemiological Context • Alcohol use rapidly increases during adolescence, peaking in the early-mid 20s • AUDs show roughly a similar pattern • Implications • Etiological theory needs to address the developmental processes that can help explain this strong, age-graded phenomenon • Processes responsible for desistence (offset) are important for understanding the population prevalence and persistence

  13. Meta-models of AUD Etiology • Pharmacological Vulnerability • Affect Regulation • Negative affect regulation (“self-medication”) • Positive affect regulation (“reward seeking”) • Deviance/Disinhibition

  14. Meta-models of AUD Etiology • Pharmacological Vulnerability • Affect Regulation • Negative affect regulation (“self-medication”) • Positive affect regulation (“reward seeking”) • Deviance/Disinhibition

  15. Pharmacological Vulnerability • Premise: Individual differences in alcohol effects are related to risk for developing AUDs • Insensitivity/tolerance to punishing effects • Insensitivity/tolerance to reinforcing effects • Sensitivity to reinforcing effects • Sensitivity to disinhibition

  16. Pharmacological Vulnerability: Insensitivity to Punishing Effects • Alcohol-related flushing and its relation to drinking rates and AUDs • ADH polymorphisms • ALDH polymorphisms • Other forms of alcohol-related punishment • Headaches and other symptoms? • Hangover?

  17. Pharmacological Vulnerability: Insensitivity to Reinforcement • Low sensitivity and risk for alcoholism • Laboratory findings • Prospective findings • Question of type of effect • Reinforcement or punishment? • Question of BAC Limb • Findings generalized or specific to descending limb?

  18. Pharmacological Vulnerability: Sensitivity to Reinforcement • Positive Reinforcement • Increased arousal • Negative Reinforcement • Stress response dampening • Other measures of effect of alcohol on mood and emotion

  19. Pharmacological Vulnerability: Sensitivity to Disinhibition • Alcohol impairs inhibitory responses • On motor tasks (e.g., go/no-go) • On provoked aggression tasks (e.g., TAP, point subtraction task) • Possible mechanism: disruption of executive functioning • Baseline executive functioning may moderate alcohol/aggression relationship

  20. Pharmacological Vulnerability: Rapprochement

  21. Meta-models of AUD Etiology • Pharmacological Vulnerability • Affect Regulation • Negative affect regulation (“self-medication”) • Positive affect regulation (“reward seeking”) • Deviance/Disinhibition

  22. Affect Regulation:Negative Mood Regulation • Premise: Alcohol relieves negative moods • Evidence for: • Anxiolytic effects of ethanol in some lab models • “Coping motives” and “tension reduction” expectancies and their relation to drinking • Studies of “stress induced drinking” • Diary studies of drinking and stress/emotions • High comorbidity between anxiety and mood disorders and AUDs • Correlation between negative affectivity/neuroticism and drinking problems

  23. Affect Regulation:Negative Mood Regulation • Evidence against: • Weak correlation between Q-F measures and mood states • Not all lab preparations demonstrate antidepressant or anxiolytic effects • Complexities: • Dose dependency • Effects of chronic alcohol consumption on affective tone…allostasis • Range of emotion-regulation strategies available

  24. Affect Regulation:Negative Mood Regulation • Alcohol can help regulate negative moods and emotions but • Not for all people • Not at all doses • Not in all situations • Protracted heavy consumption may lead to mood dysregulation…regardless of original motivation

  25. Affect Regulation:Positive Mood Regulation • Premise: Alcohol increases positive moods • Evidence for: • Low-moderate doses increase reports of stimulation and euphoria…at least early in the course of intoxication • “Enhancement” motives and generalized expectancies for alcohol as a positively transforming substance are commonly endorsed & correlate with both consumption and problems • Reward seeking (e.g., novelty seeking) is a strong correlate of alcohol consumption

  26. Premise: Alcohol increases positive moods • Complexities: • Alcohol effects seem to be somewhat context dependent (e.g., effects are dose- dependent, person-dependent, subject to tolerance, etc.) • Descending limb effects are typically not positively reinforcing

  27. Meta-models of AUD Etiology • Pharmacological Vulnerability • Affect Regulation • Negative affect regulation (“self-medication”) • Positive affect regulation (“reward seeking”) • Deviance/Disinhibition

  28. Deviance/Disinhibition • Premise: Pathological alcohol use is just a facet of a larger syndrome of externalizing behavior • Evidence for: • Abundance of psychometric work showing that alcohol involvement is associated with a wide range of other “problem behaviors” • Personality traits associated with disinhibition a strong correlate of AUDs • Behavior-genetic studies show a strong genetic correlation between AUDs and other forms of externalizing behavior

  29. Deviance/Disinhibition

  30. Deviance/Disinhibition

  31. Deviance/Disinhibition • Evidence against • No real evidence against but not all individuals suffering from AUDs have an “externalizing” symptom picture…clearly doesn’t explain all cases of AUDs • Complexities • Externalizing behavior can be a determinant as well as a consequence of alcohol involvement • Acutely • Chronically

  32. Etiological Processes • Multiple etiological processes likely operating • Pharmacological vulnerability • Affect regulation • Deviance proneness/Disinhibition • These processes are likely overlapping • Suggest multiple opportunities for prevention and treatment

  33. Risk at the Individual Level • Individual difference variables bias individuals towards different etiological processes • Family history • Personality • Comorbid psychopathology • Alcohol expectancies and drinking motives

  34. Risk at the Individual Level: Family History of Alcoholism • Family history of alcoholism represents one of the best established risk factors for alcohol dependence • Genetic epidemiological studies indicate a substantial role of heredity • Several specific genes appear to convey risk for alcohol dependence

  35. Risk at the Individual Level: Personality • Two broad personality traits appear to be related to risk for AUDs • Traits related to disinhibition/behavioral undercontrol • Traits related to neuroticism/negative emotionality • Traits demonstrated to be important prospectively and to mediate some degree of genetic risk

  36. Risk at the Individual Level: Personality

  37. Risk at the Individual Level: Comorbid Psychopathology • A wide range of childhood and adult disorders associated with risk for alcohol dependence • Childhood and adolescent disorders • ADHD • Conduct Disorder • Mood Disorders

  38. Risk at the Individual Level: Comorbid Psychopathology • Adult disorders • Anxiety Disorders • Depression • Bipolar Disorder • Substance Use Disorders • The special case of tobacco dependence

  39. Comorbid Disorders in Individuals with DSM-III-R Alcohol Dependence Kessler et al, 1997

  40. Risk at the Individual Level: Drinking Motivation • Drinking motives and alcohol outcome expectancies are potent predictors of alcohol involvement • Alcohol outcome expectancies • Beliefs individuals hold concerning the expected outcomes of drinking • Drinking motives • Reasons individuals give for drinking

  41. Risk at the Individual Level: Drinking Motivation • Domains of alcohol outcome expectancies

  42. Risk at the Individual Level: Drinking Motivation • Domains of drinking motives

  43. Risk at the Individual Level: Drinking Motivation • These motivational constructs differentially relate to drinking outcomes in complex ways • “Enhancement” motives • Associated with externalizing traits and predicts problem drinking only through consumption • “Coping” motives • Associated with negative affectivity and predicts problem drinking above and beyond its association with consumption

  44. Risk at the Individual Level: Drinking Motivation • These types of constructs may provide important mediational links between dispositional variables and actual drinking behavior • Expectancies change dynamically, even prior to drinking, and may represent an important modifiable risk factor

  45. Risk at the Environmental Level • Prenatal exposures • Rearing environment/Parenting • Modeling of use • Monitoring • Nurturance/warmth • Abuse and neglect • Peer environment • Life events • Alcohol advertising • Policy surrounding sales and intoxicated behavior • Culture

  46. Risk at the Environmental Level: Some Conceptual Issues • Environment is a multifaceted domain • Biological environment • Interpersonal environment • Policy environment • Cultural environment • Individuals seek out and create their own environments • E.g., Greek organizations on college campuses

  47. Risk at the Environmental Level: Some Conceptual Issues • Person X Environment Interactionism • G x E • More general cases of interactions with environment • Distal Environment vs. Proximal Environment • Effects on traits • Effects on behavioral expression

  48. Towards an Integrated Etiological Perspective • Etiological analyses can be conducted at multiple levels of analysis • Etiological pathways can be conceptualized that link molecular processes (e.g., receptor sensitivity, gene expression) to alcohol seeking but… • Numerous instigating and inhibitory processes need to be considered

  49. Towards an Integrated Etiological Perspective (cont’d) • Etiological mechanisms can be organizing principles for understanding the function of specific risk factors • Etiological heterogeneity  • Wide ranging correlates • Heterogeneity in syndrome and course? • Multiple opportunities for prevention and treatment

More Related