510 likes | 1.33k Views
SPACE COMMUNICATION. PRESENTED BY : NABARUN SINHAMAHAPATRA(55) Nirmal haldar (56) Avijit nandi (26) Partha pal(60) Chandi charan jana (31). CONTENTS. SL NAME SLIDE NO NO . INTRODUCTION 3 – 4
E N D
SPACECOMMUNICATION PRESENTED BY: NABARUN SINHAMAHAPATRA(55) Nirmalhaldar(56) Avijitnandi(26) Partha pal(60) Chandicharanjana(31)
CONTENTS SLNAMESLIDE NO NO. • INTRODUCTION 3 – 4 • OBJECTIVES 5 • SPACE NETWORK 6 - 11 ARCHITECHTURE • COMMUNICATION 12 - 15 DIFFICULTIES • SOLUTION OF SPACE 16 COMMUNICATION • PRESENT OR NEW 17 TECHNOLOGIES • OPTICAL SPACE 18 COMMUNICATION • TRANSMISSION PROTOCOLS 19 SPACE COMMUNICATION • SATELLITE COMMUNICATION 20 – 22 • MAN IN SPACE COMMUNICATION 23 • CONCEPT OF INTERPLANETARY INTERNET 24 - 25 • CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION • Development of efficient and intelligent protocol for space environment is deeply felt. • IIP is newly conceived. • More emphasis is given to Dynamic Routing Protocol (DRP)
WHATIS SPACE COMMUNICATION? • Communication between a vehicle in outer space and Earth . • Provision for such communication is essential in any space mission. • Total communication system includes:- 1. Command 2. Telemetry 3.Tracking
OBJECTIVES • Time-insensitive Scientific data delivery • Time-sensitive Scientific data delivery • Mission Status Telemetry • Command and Control
SPACE NETWORK ARCHITECHTURE • Backbone or Interplanetary Network or Deep Space. • Orbital Network. • Proximity Network or Surface Network.
BACKBONE NETWORK • Earth – Mars Network • Earth – Orbital Network • Earth – Lagrangian – Relay - Orbital (Multi-Hop) Network
ORBITAL NETWORK • Access Network • Inter – Orbital Network • Inter – Spacecraft & Intra – Spacecraft Network
PROXIMITY NETWORK • Sensor Networks • Inter – surface Element Networks • Human – Robot Network
SPACE NETWORK BACK-BONE ORBITAL PROXIMITY SURFACE HUMAN ROBOT SENSOR ACCESS EARTH-LAGRANGIAN EARTH-MARS EARTH-ORBITAL INTER ORBITAL SPACE- CRAFT
TRANSMISSION PROTOCOLS FOR SPACE COMMUNICATION Path service Internet service
COMMUNICATION DIFFICULTIES IN SPACE ENVIRONMENT • Deep space • Surface • Orbital
DIFFICULTIES IN DEEP-SPACE NETWORK • Very high & variable propagation delay. • High link error rates or error prone links. • Blackout or intermittent connectivity. • Bandwidth(BW) asymmetry. • Security.
DIFFICULTIESIN ORBITAL NETWORK • Weight , Cost & Power. • Latency. • Gravitational Fluctuations. • The Sun’s Interface. • Doppler’s Effect. • Orbital Debris.
DIFFICULTIESIN SURFACE NETWORK • Noise & power issue. • Intermittent connection.
SOLUTION OF SPACE PROBLEMS • TCP/IP Extension. • DTN. • CCSDS/CFDP. • Data centric , Position based Routing. • IIP.
PRESENT OR NEW TECHNOLOGIES • DSN Antennas. • Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System(TDRSS).
SATELLITE COMMUNICATION • Two Stations on Earth want to communicate through radio broadcast but are too far away to use conventional means. • The two stations can use a satellite as a relay station for their communication. • One Earth Station sends a transmission to the satellite. This is called a Uplink. • One Earth Station receives a transmission from the satellite. This is called a downlink.
ADVANTAGE OF SATELLITES • Coverage area of a satellite greatly exceeds. • Transmission cost • Satellite to Satellite communication is very precise. • Higher Bandwidths
DISADVANTAGES OF SATELLITES • Launching satellites into orbit is costly. • There is a larger propagation delay in satellite communication than in terrestrial communication.
RECENT TRENDS • Space stations • Interplanetary Internet • Men in space communication • Future development targets
SPACE STATIONS • Manned satellite designed to remain in LEO for a long period of time. • A space station is distinguished from other manned spacecraft by its lack of major propulsion or landing facilities. • Only space station currently in orbit is ISS.
LIST OF SPACE STATIONS • he Soviet space stations came in two types, the civilian Durable Orbital Station (DOS), and the military Almaz stations. • Salyut space stations (USSR, 1971–1986) • Salyut 1 (1971, 1 crew and 1 failed docking) • DOS-2 (1972, launch failure) • Salyut 2/Almaz (1973, failed shortly after launch) • Cosmos 557 (1973, re-entered eleven days after launch) • Salyut 3/Almaz (1974, 1 crew and 1 failed docking) • Salyut 4 (1975, 2 crews and 1 planned crew failed to achieve orbit) • Salyut 5/Almaz (1976–1977, 2 crews and 1 failed docking) • Salyut 6 (1977–1981, 16 crews (5 long duration, 11 short duration and 1 failed docking) • Salyut 7 (1982–1986, 10 crews (6 long duration, 4 short duration and 1 failed docking) • Skylab (USA, 1973–1974, 3 crews) • Mir (USSR/Russia, 1986–2000, 28 long duration crews) • International Space Station (ISS) (United States, European Space Agency, Japan, Russia, and Canada 2000-ongoing, 24 long duration crews as of July 2010)
CONCEPTS OFINTERPLANETARY INTERNET • IPN(Inter Planetary Internet) is a conceived computer network, consisting of a set of network nodes which can communicate with each other. • IPN study was started by a team of scientists at JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) at NASA. • Communication would be greatly delayed by the great interplanetary distances. • So the IPN needs a new set of protocols and technology . • The InterPlanetary Internet Special Interest Group of the Internet Society has worked hard on defining these protocols and standards that would make the IPN possible.
MAN IN SPACE COMMUNICATION • A Communication system is being built for the Lunar Excursion Module(LEM). • This system will provide communication links between the LEM & Earth. • The functional requirements for LEM system :- 1.Voice communication. 2.Telemetry. 3.Television. 4.Range information. 5.Biomedical data.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: TARGETS & MILESTONES • People’s Republic of China is expected to launch its first space station named Tiangong 1 in the 1st half of 2011. • U.S. company Bigelow Aerospace is developing the Bigelow Commercial Space Station, a private orbital complex. • Galactic Suite is a space hotel planned to be operational by 2012.
CONCLUSION • The cause of poor performance of IP(Internet Protocol) in space has been studied. • Many strategies that have been put forward as solution give emphasis on DRP(Dynamic Routing Protocol). • So, DRP will be put into simulation for space communication . • The results extracted will prove its suitability in space communication.
THANK YOU SPECIAL THANKS TO:- AMIYA KUMAR SARKAR , Our mentor