310 likes | 640 Views
Technical Committee Chair ? Billy Ragsdale Vice-chair ? Tom Breen Network Committee Chair ? Anand AkundiCPE Committee Chair ? Mike VislockyData Committee Chair? Delaine ArnoldVoIP / Packet Committee Chair ? Nate WilcoxNon - Traditional Committee Chair
E N D
1. ESIF 20 NENA Technical Committee Status Report Tom Breen
For Roger Hixson
January 17, 2007
2. Technical Committee Chair – Billy Ragsdale
Vice-chair – Tom Breen
Network Committee Chair – Anand Akundi
CPE Committee Chair – Mike Vislocky
Data Committee Chair– Delaine Arnold
VoIP / Packet Committee Chair – Nate Wilcox
Non - Traditional Committee Chair – Tony Busam
Technical Issues Director – Roger Hixson
NENA’S TECHNICAL COMMITTEE( All Committees have Vice Chairs )
3.
NENA’s 14th Annual Technical Conference
January 21-24 in Nashville
NG9-1-1 will be a major focus
Joint TDC/ODC Opening session on NG9-1-1
NENA’s NG9-1-1 multi-year Project Plan will be overviewed
TDC/ODC brochure with Registration material
available at www.nena.org
2007 Technical Development Conference (TDC)
4. NENA Technical Committee
Administrative Document
describing:
Technical Committee Organizational Structure
Document Development & Approval Processes
available at www.nena.org
01-001 Update is Completed
5. Network Technical Committee – Anand Akundi
Voice Circuit Standards WG - Joe Marino
Network Quality Assurance and Design WG - Ken Maynard & Jim Winegarden
Default Call Path WG – Bernard Brabant
Geographic Number Portability WG- Tom Hinkelman
Rate Center Consolidation WG - Tom Hinkelman
6. CPE Technical Committee –
Chair: Mike Vislocky, Vice-Chair: Dave Hayes
Legacy Interface - Gary Hutchins
ALI Standard Interface Working Group – XML Interface – John Sines
CPE Security Working Group - Jeremy Smith
CPE IP Capable PSAP Working Group - Glenn Bowers
7. Data Technical Committee – Delaine Arnold
VDB/MSAG WG: Delaine Arnold
1st release of standard published
Standardize validation rules between VDB & LIS and VPC & ERDB. Critical that validation results in the same MSAG valid address
DB Maintenance WG – Erica Aubut
GIS WG: Erica Aubut
LNP WG: Judy Graham
XML Data Exchange WG: Kim Leigh
8. Non-Traditional Technical Committee Chair: Tony Busam, Vice-Chair: Dave Irwin
Subject Areas:
Telematics
Data Only Devices
Convergence
10. Major Work VoIP E9-1-1 Interim Solution (i2) standard completed – NENA 08-001
Several lingering issues to be addressed under the i2.5 work
i3 Technical Requirements Document Completed
Location TID and TRD Completed
Input to i3 requirements
Transmitted to SDOs for review/input
SDO Status document revised
11. i3 Requirements Document Completed The i3 requirements document is completed
First Technical Requirements Document completed within NENA - NENA 08-751
Part of the overall NENA NG9-1-1 Requirements
12. NG9-1-1 Requirements Application .
13. More i3 Work External interfaces/architecture standard version 1 document is completed
Contributions, liaisons and a drafty sent out to several other industry SDO’s
Adding Appendix covering IP Network design and requirements for NG9-1-1
NEED MORE PARTICIPATION !!!
14. Upcoming Work i2.5 work effort to continue
Other i3 documents and standards to be released
Interaction with development work in several other SDO’s
Continue to lead in development of next generation emergency services efforts
15. NENA NG9-1-1 Interim and Long Term Impacts Input to several SDOs for coordination with IP Telecomm development
Canadian CISC Report to CRTC names both NENA Interim VoIP Solution and NG9-1-1 i3 content as recommended path for Canada
NENA NG9-1-1 definitions are expected to be primary input to the upcoming USDOT NG9-1-1 Project (contract assigned) in 2007-2008
NENA is a sub for the USDOT contract
16. NENA NG9-1-1 Interim and Long Term Impacts NENA Tech-Ops Joint NG9-1-1 Transition Planning Committee (NGTPC) started in November 2006
Preliminary `Considerations’ document provided for kickoff of the NGTPC
Technical, PSAP, NG9-1-1 System operational
Transition plans for various start points -> NG9-1-1
Transition plans oriented to stake holder interest groups
NGTPC will expand initial considerations and set work priorities
First F2F meeting January 21, 2007 at TDC/ODC
17. NENA NG9-1-1 Interim and Long Term Impacts NENA Senior Staff to develop overall NG9-1-1 Project Plan - started Oct 10-11
Will encompass all current and major future activities to bring NG9-1-1 into actuality
(see NG9-1-1 Activity Relationships diagram –
high level - next slide)
Draft of next level activities in 1Q 2007
18. NENA NG9-1-1 Project Activity RelationshipsHigh Level Strategic Plan – NENA with ICO and other stakeholders
coordination, gap analysis, critical path -> activity adjustment, ID needs ->
initiation, evaluation -> adjustments, fit with EmerComm environment and
related standards
Testing and trials – DOT, nature of trial re others needed?
CRITICAL to establish the intended completeness of DOT trial vs additional
needs for full testing prior to implementation
Testing involved in all project activities shown.
System Operations development, with Performance Criteria
Subsystems and interfaces (new operators, must be ready)
Transition Plan – development and application
SDO and`Industry’ development, NENA Certification Program development
PSAP Operations development
Technical Development (NENA with IETF)
NG E9-1-1 Partner program – enabling factors resolution allows NG9-1-1 to happen
NENA Certification Program – IP network capability to support NG9-1-1, NG9-1-1 Architecture and protocol functions capability, implementation processes, service provider operations, Public Safety NG9-1-1 operations processes. Order: Products, NG9-1-1 service providers, originating service providers, 9-1-1 authorities/PSAPsStrategic Plan – NENA with ICO and other stakeholders
coordination, gap analysis, critical path -> activity adjustment, ID needs ->
initiation, evaluation -> adjustments, fit with EmerComm environment and
related standards
Testing and trials – DOT, nature of trial re others needed?
CRITICAL to establish the intended completeness of DOT trial vs additional
needs for full testing prior to implementation
Testing involved in all project activities shown.
System Operations development, with Performance Criteria
Subsystems and interfaces (new operators, must be ready)
Transition Plan – development and application
SDO and`Industry’ development, NENA Certification Program development
PSAP Operations development
Technical Development (NENA with IETF)
NG E9-1-1 Partner program – enabling factors resolution allows NG9-1-1 to happen
NENA Certification Program – IP network capability to support NG9-1-1, NG9-1-1 Architecture and protocol functions capability, implementation processes, service provider operations, Public Safety NG9-1-1 operations processes. Order: Products, NG9-1-1 service providers, originating service providers, 9-1-1 authorities/PSAPs
19. NENA 9-1-1 Center Operations Committee Update NENA IP Capable PSAP Features and Capabilities Standard revision has completed its technical/operations committees’ review & comment period. It is expected to go out for public review in late January/early/February.
NENA E9-1-1 Wireless Maintenance Call Routing & Testing Validation Standard has completed its public review & comment period. Its next step is submissionto NENA’s Standards Advisory Committee and the Executive Board for final approval, expected in early February. (This standard contains text which should provide closure language for ESIF issues 35 & 36 – processes when adding cell sites.)
Video Relay Service & IP Relay Service Operational Information Document continues to be developed with participation of consumer groups, relay service providers, PSAPs and others – this is part of multiple efforts to improve emergency services access to those who utilize VRS & IP Relay. NENA’s technical leadership has provided recommendations. LNPA-WG has submitted a related recommendation to ATIS INC, regarding numbers for those who utilize such services, also to help improve emergency services access – both to speed up and to help ensure correct routing.
20. NENA 9-1-1 Center Operations Committee Update NENA’s Operational Development Conference will be held January 21-24, 2007 in Nashville
Addressing numerous NG9-1-1 issues from an operational perspective
Issues to be addressed as part of operational standard development include:
wireless voice blanking,
dual-mode service (such as traditional wireless/WiFi),
simultaneous ring,
vehicular & personal telematics functional requirements,
numerous issues related to voice, video and text-based services/devices with emergency services access (such as 9-1-1).
21. NENA Future Path Plan and Compliance Review Process NENA Technical Lead Team believes that conversion to a NG9-1-1 Compliance Program is appropriate
NENA Board and NG Partners agree
Work has begun in early 2007 on NG9-1-1 Certification plan
Priority of development:
Products
NG9-1-1 system service providers
Originating service providers
9-1-1 Authorities / PSAPs
22. NENA’s NG Partner Program Enable acceleration of NG9-1-1 as national project
Partners - critical mass of 9-1-1 industry and new players
Convergence of effort
As foundation to other NG9-1-1 efforts, resolve enabling factors:
Funding
Policy
Jurisdiction
Data Access
Location Identification/Call Routing
Requirements and Standards
Trials / demos
Interoperability
Disaster Planning
Education at all levels
27. Education Discussed in all roundtables
Importance to PSAPs, public safety, and public
Message for NG9-1-1
We are evolving to improve future 9-1-1
Better 9-1-1 service for less money
NG will help in 9-1-1 delivery to areas w/o Enhanced 9-1-1 and in deployment of Wireless Phase I and Phase II
28. Education Target Audience Those who can implement NG 9-1-1
- Government agencies
- Local & state associations
- Emergency services/first responders
- Industry
Public is secondary as audience, but important (e.g. schools, AARP, civic orgs.)
29. Demos/Trials Potential Sites
- States – CA, IN, MT, NC, OR, TN, TX, VT
- Regions/PSAPs – Elmore Co,(AL), Minneapolis (MN), Allegheny Co. (PA), Texas 9-1-1 Districts, Texas A&M Trial expansion, Washington, DC
Currently doing a national survey of potential IP networks
30. QUESTIONS?