1 / 23

Council of Higher Education , Turkey

Council of Higher Education , Turkey. QUALITY ASSURANCE STRUCTURE in HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM of TURKEY Muharrem Kaplan Council of Higher Education EU & International Relations Department. Increase in Demand for Higher Education. YEAR APPLICANTS to the SSE 1980 466.963

aileen-palmer
Download Presentation

Council of Higher Education , Turkey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Council of HigherEducation, Turkey

  2. QUALITY ASSURANCE STRUCTURE in HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM of TURKEY • Muharrem Kaplan • Council of Higher Education • EU & International Relations Department

  3. Increase in Demand for Higher Education • YEAR APPLICANTS to the SSE • 1980 466.963 • 2005 1.856.618 • 2006 1.678.383 • 2007 1.776.443 • 2008 1.645.000 • 2009 1.450.000 (Acc. 600.000)

  4. Years - # Students Admitted to the Universities

  5. EducationSystem in Turkey

  6. StudentSelectionExamination - Preferences

  7. HigherEducationSystem

  8. Current Enrollment in HE 3.127.651

  9. GenderDimensionFaculty41.000 Female & 57.500 Male 98.500 Uni. Teachers

  10. CoHECouncil of HigherEducation • No Ministry of Higher Education but CoHE • Autonomous body • Established in 1981 • The President, Prof. Yusuf Ziya Ozcan • Members of the Council are independent professors

  11. The Council of Higher Education composed of 21 members: 1. The President of Turkey → Seven Members, 2. The Council of Ministers→ Seven Members, 3. The Inter-University Board →Seven professors from among non-members of the Board.

  12. HigherEducationInstitutions Totally 151 HigherEducationInstitutions, Thesenumbers can increaseduetohighdemand

  13. Universities-Student Population They Served %

  14. Commission of Academic Assessment and Quality Improvement, YODEK

  15. Academic Assessment and Quality Improvement Processes

  16. Experiences in Accreditation • ABET→ Accreditation Board forEngineeringandTechnology , • USA based, • 4 universitiesusednearly 50 engineeringprograms, • MUDEK → The Association of Academic Assessment andQuality Improvement for Eng. Departments, • TURKEY based, • 2007 , 10 +universities 60 + engineeringdepartments • EUA→EuropeanUniversityAssociations, Europebased • ManyUniversities in Turkeyarebeingaccreditedby EUA, CoHE is writtingthesupportletterforthem.

  17. Performance Indicators of EUA and YODEK • Some Indicators => • Student/teacher ratio • Tech. Staff/teacher ratio • The material resources/student ratio • Mechanism for the recognition of student participation • Diversity of source of financing • Survey (EUA) also SSE (TURKEY student preference) • Foreign students number and ratio • Scientific research and publications, etc.

  18. Bologna Coordination Commissions BCC • Every HEI has to establish its own BCC • The head of BCC is vice-president/rector • Responsible for implementation of Bologna Process in HEI. • August 2009, CoHE gathered the data, based on more than 600 variables • The variables have been analysed for monitoring and policy making • According to the data collected, some of the challenges and tendencies observed as follows:

  19. Some Challenges • Lots of new universities who need infrastructure • The work load of academicians is a lot • Participation of other stakeholders, such as industrial sector and students is still below under expectations • Some old and well established universities are fairly slow compare to new and flexible ones • Academic Assessment and Quality Improvement Boards did not performed well in some universities • In some universities only pilot observation

  20. Strength of HE in TURKEY • Departments in Science and Technology are eager in QA • Increase in cooperation with industrial sector • Participation of proffessors, as stakeholders, are very good • QA process opened more places for HEIs far away from the eyes • QA has pushing effect on established HEIs, competition between universities are increasing • ABET experiences helped so much in QA of MUDEK • Effect of sharply increasing number of ERASMUS students from Europe and to Europe is amazing • There is no important resistance for QA system in HEIs as there was a little at the beginning • Number of people who hold PhD is increasing

  21. To Summarize • According to the last data collected: • Universities that have more flexible administration performed very well, because of easy adaptation and • More student oriented universities are moving forward incredibly fast • Well established old universities have disadvantages but they are benefitting from advantages of international students

  22. Thank You for Your Listening • By Muharrem Kaplan • Council of Higher Education • muharrem.kaplan@yok.gov.tr

More Related