1 / 14

COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION

COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION. Public Provider Quality Forum: Accreditation, HEQSF Developments & Implementation 18 March 2013. ACCREDITATION. Quality of submissions Innovative arrangements Conditions not met Complaints Withdrawal of accreditation Illegal provision. HEQSF REVIEW.

jarvis
Download Presentation

COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION Public Provider Quality Forum: Accreditation, HEQSF Developments & Implementation 18 March 2013

  2. ACCREDITATION • Quality of submissions • Innovative arrangements • Conditions not met • Complaints • Withdrawal of accreditation • Illegal provision

  3. HEQSF REVIEW • 14 December 2012 – MHET approved QCs gazette individual sub-frameworks • January 2013 CHE CEO issued revised HEQSF – institutions can submit according to either HEQF or HEQSF for accreditation • SAQA proposed gazetting 3 sub-frameworks simultaneously (March / April 2013)

  4. PURPOSE OF HEQSF ALIGNMENT • Bring all HE qualifications onto a single integrated national framework (NQF) • More rungs for HE to occupy – move from 6 to 9 qualification types • Offers a nested approach to qualification design: qualification types / designators / qualifiers etc. • Intended to simplify HE and make it more flexible

  5. QUALIFICATIONS RECEIVED

  6. UNIVERSITIES

  7. COMPREHENSIVES

  8. UOT’S

  9. CESMDISTRIBUTION

  10. ISSUES AND CONCERNS RAISED • Delays in revising and gazetting HEQSF • Doctoral and Diploma programmes • Articulation routes • Professional ‘gaps’ – proposal of exceptions to meet requirements for specific professions • Meetings with Professional Bodies and disciplinary groups to assist • Missing info – Category A

  11. CATEGORY B PROCESS • March – May 2013 institutions prepare offline Category B applications in word format • Institutions will be informed when to submit Category B applications via HEQF-online system, 3 submission dates • August 2013 – October 2013 CHE train subject-matter experts as evaluators to evaluate the Category B submissions • Applications will be evaluated per discipline and qualification type • Processed in an Accreditation-type evaluation and tabled at HEQC for final approval • Outcomes will be communicated to institutions once approved • Anticipated all evaluations and outcomes will be released by end of 2015

  12. CATEGORY B ONLINE PROCESS

  13. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? Professor Monie Naidoo Tamara Bezuidenhout E-mail: heqfonline@che.ac.za URL: http://www.che.ac.za/heqf/

  14. REVISED HEQSF 10 9 8 7 6 5 Prof D Doc Snr Doc Res M/course M Prof M PG Dip Level 8 deg 480 Deg 480 Hons Hons Level 7 deg prof Level 7 360 AD • Dip 360 AC Dip 240 HC

More Related