1 / 28

Experience Sharing of Implementing Community Led Total Sanitation in

Experience Sharing of Implementing Community Led Total Sanitation in Union Council Samaro – Umerkot Sindh 2007-2008 By Thardeep Rural Dev. Program (TRDP) In Collaboration with Rural Support Programmes Network (RSPN). Profile and Pre Project Situation of UC Samaro. Villages 45

aislin
Download Presentation

Experience Sharing of Implementing Community Led Total Sanitation in

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experience Sharing of Implementing Community Led Total Sanitation in Union Council Samaro – Umerkot Sindh 2007-2008 By Thardeep Rural Dev. Program (TRDP) In Collaboration with Rural Support Programmes Network (RSPN)

  2. Profile and Pre Project Situation of UC Samaro • Villages 45 • Households 2289 • Population 14563 • Children under age 10 yrs 35 % Open Defecation Practice • Practice of open defecation 53.4 % (1213 Hh) • Major site of open defecation- fields 76 % • Never thought of building a latrine 30 % • Estimated cost of latrine (as per community) Rs. 7500

  3. Pre Project Situation of UC Samaro • Main source of drinking water (open well) 58.0 % • Water purification at HH level 30 % • Diarrhea incidence 20 % (every fifth person) • Malaria 17 % • Skin diseases 7 %

  4. U.C Samaro where CLTS-Project is running Project Site

  5. Pre & Post Situation

  6. Triangle of Project Stakeholders Communities Local Govt TRDP & Other technical partners

  7. Why we selected UC Samaro

  8. Why CLTS Approach? • No hardware was required • No materials required • Time saving • No external technical expertise was required • Mostly latrines built by women & children • More innovative approaches by community (local material used) • Women were trainers & practitioners of CLTS approach • No external subsidy was required • Latrines built on self-help basis • Less expensive (Money saving) • Acceptable for poor households (no cost involved)

  9. Capacity Building of Community Activists (May 2007)

  10. Social Mobilization Sensitization & Awareness Through: • Community Activists (social mobilization) • WOMEN played a key role • Religious leaders (talking CLTS in juma prayer) • Teachers (Schools health and hygiene session) • Lady Health Workers (health sessions) • UC Councilors/ Nazims (reward, advocacy)

  11. UC Nazim – Leader of Social Change(with a delegation of RSPs staff)

  12. CLTS Steps / Mobilization Process

  13. Transect Walk / Walk of shame

  14. Social Mapping

  15. Calculation of Faeces

  16. Involving Children in CLTS

  17. Flow Diagram Fingers Flies Fluid Fields

  18. Planning for solution (Action Plan)

  19. Case Studies • Oako ki Kahani – A natural leader • Hasan Shah Baghban – A woman who initiated before CLTS activities launched.

  20. Local solutions /Monitoring of progress • Using local materials & appropriate model (pit latrine etc). • Monitoring through local leaders • Establishment of monitoring system (Total HH, with /without latrine /currently using and target no. of households).

  21. Emergence of natural leaders during social mobilization process

  22. Local Solutions

  23. Lesson Learned • Women and children involvement played a key role in achieving the target of ODF. • Supportive role of UC /TMA Nazims in sustaining the change. • Regular monitoring by TRDP senior colleagues • No-resistance to change by communities (easily accepted the CLTS approach). • School teachers /religious leader role. • Experiencing the pit latrine in sandy area.

  24. Religious leader was found always one step ahead of other stakeholders

  25. Current Status (Oct 2008) • All five villages with 2289 households have stopped open defecation practice in open spaces. • Impact Assessment conducted by Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) & RSPN. • CLTS initiative is being documented as part of the national CLTS documentation by RSPN.

  26. Moving on Sanitation Ladder • Most of HHs have improved their pit latrines in UC Samaro • The latrine design evolved & improved gradually. • There regular use of latrine is an evidence of behavior change.

  27. Moving on Sanitation Ladder • Stepping on 2nd step of CLTS: Solid Waste Management initiated with support from UC & Tehsil Nazim and RSPN’s technical support (Pak Rs 6.75 Million) • Stepping on 3rd step of CLTS: Low Cost Sanitation Mode launched with support from UC /TMA & RSPN/TRDP (Pak Rs. 4.39 Million) • Project Site is open for visitors of other RSPs /NGOs (UNICEF, WSP-SA, RSPs staff /community activists and many other local NGOs visited)

  28. Thank You

More Related