1 / 43

MODERN 1 st Year Review ENIAC-120003 MODERN Ref. Technical Annex MODERN_PartB Rev2 v2.4

MODERN 1 st Year Review ENIAC-120003 MODERN Ref. Technical Annex MODERN_PartB Rev2 v2.4. WP1: Giuliana Gangemi WP2: Andr é Juge WP3: Wilmar Heuvelman WP4: Davide Pandini WP5: Loris Vendrame Coordinator: Jan van Gerwen Date: June 22, 2010 (09.30 - 17.00 hrs)

aladdin-delaney
Download Presentation

MODERN 1 st Year Review ENIAC-120003 MODERN Ref. Technical Annex MODERN_PartB Rev2 v2.4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MODERN 1st Year Review ENIAC-120003 MODERNRef. Technical Annex MODERN_PartB Rev2 v2.4 WP1: Giuliana Gangemi WP2: André Juge WP3: Wilmar Heuvelman WP4: Davide Pandini WP5: Loris Vendrame Coordinator: Jan van Gerwen Date: June 22, 2010 (09.30 - 17.00 hrs) Review period: 2009-03-01 : 2010-02-28

  2. Agenda • General information (JvG) • Objectives • Consortium • Resources planned and used • Overview of deliverables and milestones status • Cooperation, dissemination and exploitation • Project management: progress, funding problems and amendments • Other issues, Q&A • For WP1 (GG), WP2 (AJ), WP3 (WH), WP4 (DP) and WP5 (LV) • Relationship between workpackages • Progress, highlights and lowlights • Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) • Cooperation • Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation • Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  3. Specifically, the main goals of the project are: • Advanced, yet accurate, models of process variations for nanometre devices, circuits and complex architectures. • Effective methods for evaluating the impact of process variations on manufacturability, design reliability and circuit performance. • Reliability, noise, EMC/EMI. • Timing, power and yield. • Design methods and tools to mitigate or tolerate the effects of process variations on those quantities applicable at the device, circuit and architectural levels. • Validation of the modelling and design methods and tools on a variety of silicon demonstrators. Layout and strain induced variability (Synopsys) Objectives • The objective of the MODERN project is to develop new paradigms in integrated circuit design that will enable the manufacturing of reliable, low cost, low EMI, high-yield complex products using unreliable and variable devices. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  4. 28 Partners 9 Countries Consortium • The MODERN Consortium features strong competence and expertise in the field of advanced technologies, with a well-balanced participation between Large Industries, SMEs, Research Centres and Universities from all over Europe. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  5. Resources planned and used MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  6. Overview of deliverables and milestones status (1) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  7. Overview of deliverables and milestones status (2) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  8. Overview of deliverables and milestones status (3) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  9. Cooperation, dissemination and exploitation MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  10. Project management: progress, funding problems and amendments MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  11. Other issues Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  12. WP1: Relationship between workpackages MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  13. WP1: Progress, highlights and lowlights • WP1 has the following specific objectives: • 1. Clearly define the issues related to nano-electronic technologies that will be tackled in the MODERN project (e.g.,sensitivity of performances, power, yield, deficiencies of existing design techniques, etc). • 2. Set the target technologies for which the above listed problems will be faced. • 3. Define the specifications of the prototype tools, methods and flows that will come up as solutions of the previously listed problems. • 4. Define the requirements of the integration work needed to embed the new tools into the existing design frameworks provided by the EDA partners within the flows in use at ST, NMX, IFX,THL, AMS and NXP. • 5. Define up front all activities of all WPs of MODERN exception made of the management. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  14. WP1: Progress, highlights and lowlights • Task T1.1 Problem Definition. Technology Definition Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST-F Description of the problems to be addressed in the project. Agree on the technologies to be used • Task T1.2 Feasibility Study. Definition of Tool Specifications Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST-F Define a list of tools, methods and design practices to be developed in technical WPs. Feedback from WP2, WP3, and WP4 leaders will be needed in this task. For any of items (tools, methods and design practices) defined above, produce the relative specification. • Task T1.3 Specification of Tool demonstration and validation Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST- F For each tool or method specified produce a verification plan or check list to check the tool not only meets the specification but also solve the problem defined in the problem definition Task 1.4 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  15. WP1: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) 1 of 2 • D1.1 due M6 delivered at M15 (June the 22nd 2010) • D1.2 due M12 delivered at M15 (June the 22nd 2010) • M1.1 Problem Definition and Tests due M12 delivered M15 (june the 22nd 2010) • CHANGES Description and Motivations • D1.1: “Specification of internal design flows, environments and existing tools interfaces and industrial requirements for upgrades “ • D1.2 “Verification of upgrades achieved by the MODERN deliverables according the specifications” MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  16. WP1: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) 2 of 2 Explanation: The specification activity has gone forward at Task level within each work Package. From Tools, Models,Design techniques specifications , done internally in each Work Package, we moved to the definition of the the Industrial requirements for upgrades. Chage of perspective due to the fact that now the partners requirements are different from what thought at proposal time and the WP1 activities have started trying to make converge all partners necessities and the synthesis requirements of the different WPs in the best format with respect to the day by day activities. The purpose to make the WP1 outcome more useful to the project and the partners has made necessary the decision to delay the deliverable D1.1 to the 15th of June 2010 (and consequently the D1.2 to end of July2010). A new template for D1.1 has been agreed and we require now all Silicon Vendors involved in the project to contribute to it. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  17. WP1: Cooperation WP leader: ST-I Strong dependence on partners: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS ,ST-F Collaboration with partners: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS ,ST-F, collaboration Telephone conferences with: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS ,ST-F according requirements of deliverables. With WP Leaders weekly since the month of May. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  18. WP1: Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  19. WP2: Relationship between workpackages MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  20. WP2: Progress, high- and lowlights Task T2.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader): Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  21. WP2: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  22. WP2: Cooperation WP leader: STF2 If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  23. WP2: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  24. WP2: Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  25. WP3: Relationship between workpackages MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  26. WP3: Progress, high- and lowlights Task T3.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader): Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  27. WP3: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  28. WP3: Cooperation WP leader: NXP If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  29. WP3: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  30. WP3: Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  31. WP4: Relationship between workpackages MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  32. WP4: Progress, high- and lowlights Task T4.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader): Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  33. WP4: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  34. WP4: Cooperation WP leader: ST-I If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  35. WP4: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  36. WP4: Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  37. WP5: Relationship between workpackages MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  38. WP5: Progress, high- and lowlights Task T5.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader): Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  39. WP5: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  40. WP5: Cooperation WP leader: NMX If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when) MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  41. WP5: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  42. WP5: Other issues, Q&A MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

  43. MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010

More Related