230 likes | 246 Views
Learn about the NFI Cash Voucher Fair model transforming aid distribution in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Discover its beginnings, adaptations, successes, and lessons learned for effective humanitarian interventions. Explore the impact on local markets and beneficiaries, and the importance of collaboration for sustainable assistance.
E N D
Global Shelter Cluster – Non Food Item (NFI) Workshop Nairobi, 7-9 December 2016 NFI Cash Voucher Fairs – D.R.Congo
Content • http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/drcongo_62208.html • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJrnnLcE6S8 • Beginnings • Transformation, Adaptation, and Scale up • Today • Lessons Learned • Lessons to be Learned?
What is an NFI Cash Voucher Fair? • Artificial market allowing NFI-vulnerable families to access essential household, personal and hygiene-related items • Not a standard kit • Value vouchers redeemable for NFI of the families choice • Sometimes in combination with some direct distribution • Selected vendors; no guaranteed payment or subsidy • Vendor agreements to respect basic principles, price ceilings for certain items • Certain items not allowed – food, seed, livestock, medicines • Women represent the family as primary registered beneficiary
Beginnings • Diversity of NFI needs; every family is different • Possible to provide more choice, options without comprising quality ? • Seed Fair experiences “Can we try it for NFI?” • 2008: Pilots through a UNICEF IDP return program - 2 different provinces with CRS, Caritas Butembo-Beni, NRC
Beginnings • Initial Skepticism : • Market capacity and vendor willingness? • Quality of items? • Time needed to prepare? • Beneficiary comprehension? • 2009-2010: Scaling up through • existing NFI programmes with dedicated technical support (AVSI, Caritas Kindu, CRS, IRC, NRC, Solidarites International) • Others experimenting - Concern Worldwide, Care • Overwhelmingly positive feedback – beneficiaries, donors, vendors, NGOs ‘Let’s do more fairs!’
Beneficiary Appreciation of Quality of Articles Source: Day-of-fair interviews
Transformation, Adaptation, & Scaling Up • Promotion through the DRC NFI/Shelter Cluster at national and provincial levels • Case studies (CaLP) and Learning • Adapting monitoring and Information Management (HAP/HRP) • Post-intervention Monitoring showing same/better outcomes than distributions • Increased donor interest and questioning of distribution programmes – ‘Have you considered fairs?’ • Organizations’ finance and procurement adapt to accommodate the approach
Transformation, Adaptation & Scaling Up • Collaboration with Food Security actors-joint NFI and Food Fairs • Experiences with vouchers in open markets and pilots in e-vouchers • Promotion of locally made NFI • Better practices on setting price ceilings of key items with beneficiary and vendor committees • Some actors - inclusion of services – school fees, health • Better market analysis • Adapting voucher value to purchasing power • Combined with distributions of some items
Locally-made Cooking Pots NRC Fair – Mangina, North Kivu- July 2016
Today • Every NFI actor in DRC now uses both distribution and fair approaches; used in all provinces and territories • Since 2013, over 50%(in terms of families assisted) of all NFI assistance delivered through voucher fairs • Jan. 2009 – Oct. 2016 • over 775,000 householdsassisted (over 3.8 million people) via NFI voucher fairs • $55,311,051– injected into local markets through thousands of NFI vendors
January – October 2016 – NFI assistance in eastern DRC – Fairs and Distributions
January – October 2016 – NFI assistance in Katanga province– Fairs and Distributions
Today • Increased sophistication and sharing of good practices – Thematic Technical Workshops • Selecting vendors • Setting price platforms • Mitigating fraud • Promoting locally made NFI • Best Practice: Adapting to family size • 1-3 persons: $50 • 4-6 persons: $75 • 7 and more: $90. • Collaboration with Cash Working Group and Minimum Expenditure Baskets (MEB)
Today • Developing a ‘How To’ Guide book on NFI voucher fairs • Continued studies/learning – through post-fair-monitoring (e.g. use of shelter and livelihood materials) • Using androids, tablets for better purchasing pattern analysis • Monitoring Outcome and ‘Impact’ • Sharing beyond DRC
Lessons Learned • Do not underestimate dynamism, flexibility, and efficiency of the commercial sector • It’s not about what’s in stock, but what they can get • Convince a vendor to come to one and he/she will want to participate in more • No need to subsidize vendor costs – transport, credit, warehousing on site, etc.
Lessons Learned • You don’t need to pay cash at the site; vendors prefer delayed payment through ‘safer’ modalities – check, bank transfer • Be wary of local commercial organizations • Be wary of local authorities – ‘taxation’ • Concern of poor quality – not a significant issue
Lessons Learned • Be flexible – • adapt voucher values • include in-kind distribution (tarps, jerry-cans, ..) or required commodity vouchers • Programme people need new skill sets – markets, commercial sector, but you don’t need to be an expert • Finance and procurement systems can adapt and still meet requirements for rigor
Lessons Learned • Opening markets ; vendors going to new areas ; even contributing to community reconciliation • One size does not fit all – vast diversity of beneficiary choice • Appropriate for a range of affected population – returnees, IDPs in sites/camps, IDPs in host families, host families themselves, survivors of natural disaster • The value of choice to dignity and normalcy
Lessons Learned • Gender considerations • Understand household decision-making and gender dynamics • Woman adults in household coming to fairs as best practice • But evidence does not show considerable differences in purchasing patterns between men and women • Livelihood recovery options • Opportunity to ‘repay’ real and social debt
Lessons to be Learned ? • Understanding / Analyzing / Quantifying the multiplier effect on local economies – are there negative implications? • Items to allow and to forbid? Based on what criteria? • How best to measure purchasing patterns? • When do people simply need cash?