100 likes | 122 Views
Explore the fight against corruption in government agencies through transparency, anti-corruption laws, and integrity systems. Learn from Sweden's successful practices and emphasize the importance of accountability and public sector reform.
E N D
Some thoughts on accountability and integrity James DonovanPublic Financial Management AdvisorSwedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Stockholm
Sida’s Anti-Corruption Rule (2005) • Public Finance Management In Development Co-operation: A Manual for Sida Staff (2007)
Anti-corruption at Sida • Corruption is a major issue in popular support for Swedish development cooperation • Corruption is fundamentally and profoundly anti-poor • Never accept! • Always act! • Always report!
How Sida fights corruption • Preventing corruption and reacting to suspected corruption in Sida-supported programs and projects • Global, regional and bilateral support to explicit anti-corruption programs and projects: • Transparency International, • United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), • Vietnam’s diagnostic study of corruption, new anti-corruption law, and National Anti-Corruption Steering Committee • Global, regional and bilateral support to other elements of national integrity systems: • PEFA at the World Bank Institute, • Macroeconomic and Financial Management Institute of Eastern and Southern Africa (MEFMI), • parliamentary oversight, supreme audit institutions, tax administration…
National integrity systems • Anti-corruption laws, regulations, strategy, agencies • Public administration: • the civil service • public financial management • public sector oversight: accountants, internal audit, Ministry of Finance, external audit/supreme audit institution, parliament • Private sector: • Accountants • Audit • business and professional associations • stock markets
National integrity systems 2 • Public debate: • opposition political parties • Media • civil society • Multi-party democracy: • replacing leaders • but financing electoral campaigns • Principles: • “checks and balances”/independent, competing public institutions, • transparency, • accountability
Corruption in Sweden • 6 of 163 countries in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index 2006, behind Finland, Iceland, New Zealand, Denmark and Singapore • Public sector well functioning and responsive to citizens’ complaints • Respected and independent civil service • High degree of transparency • Principle of Public Information in the constitution • semi-autonomous government agencies, formally steered, formally reporting, publicly accountable • relatively few state-owned (parastatal) enterprises
Sida’s anti-corruption hypothesis • Personal morality versus well-functioning national integrity system • Anti-corruption laws, regulations, strategy, agencies are not enough • Many interdependent elements of a national integrity system • Years of effort to improve • But things can improve significantly before everything is in place, e.g., “name and shame”
Sida’s anti-corruption hypothesis 2 • Possible lessons from Sweden: • transparency, • public debate, • accountable public organizations, • public administration reform including • civil service reform and • public financial management reform
You are involved in historic processes • Those of us who believe in the public sector must make higher demands on the public sector