1 / 20

James Kallaos, Matthew Kotchen, Kaleena Wheeler, Crispin Wong, and Margaret Zahller

Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater Streams: Behavior, Preferences, and Willingness-to-Pay for a Disposal Program. James Kallaos, Matthew Kotchen, Kaleena Wheeler, Crispin Wong, and Margaret Zahller. Presented by: James Kallaos and Margaret Zahller. Overview.

alka
Download Presentation

James Kallaos, Matthew Kotchen, Kaleena Wheeler, Crispin Wong, and Margaret Zahller

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater Streams:Behavior, Preferences, and Willingness-to-Pay for a Disposal Program James Kallaos, Matthew Kotchen, Kaleena Wheeler, Crispin Wong, and Margaret Zahller Presented by: James Kallaos and Margaret Zahller

  2. Overview • Surveyed 1,005 randomly selected households on the central coast of California • Survey questions inquired about: • general awareness of pharmaceutical pollution • disposal practices • willingness to participate in a disposal program • willingness-to-pay (WTP) to establish a pharmaceutical disposal program

  3. Data collection • Data collected as part of the Central Coast Survey (CCS), an annual telephone survey conducted by the Social Science Survey Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara • Covers Santa Barbara and Ventura counties • Interviews conducted in English and Spanish

  4. Data collection • 1,657 households were contacted and 1,005 interviews were completed • Compared to national averages, the results show our sample to be older, with greater income, and more highly educated

  5. Awareness • “Are you aware that medical compounds have been found in treated wastewater and surface water?” • 43% of respondents are aware

  6. Disposal habits “How do you typically get rid of unwanted or expired prescription or over-the-counter medications in your household?”

  7. Age and disposal habits • Older respondents are more likely to choose disposal through the toilet/sink • Older respondents more than twice as likely to return unused medications to the pharmacy • Both age groups more likely to choose trash as the most common disposal method

  8. Disposal program: contingent valuation • “The presence of medicines in surface waters is a growing environmental concern. To address this concern, there is currently a proposal to add a surcharge to prescription medication to fund a national disposal program.” • “To implement this program, would you be willing to pay $_____ per prescription you purchase?” YES/NO • Bid Amounts: $0.05, $0.10, $0.25, $0.50, $1.00, $1.50, $2.00, $2.50

  9. Model coefficients and effects Pr[YES] = f [bid, gender, age, awareness, political party, race]

  10. Mean willingness-to-pay • Logit model: Pr(Yesi)=a+b1(Bidi)+ei • E(WTP) = / Hanemann, W. M. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3), 332-341.

  11. Willingness to participate “If a disposal program was implemented at local pharmacies, how likely would you be to return unwanted or expired medicines to your pharmacy for disposal?”

  12. Prescriptions and out-of-pocket expenditures for 2004

  13. Annual benefits of establishing a pharmaceutical disposal program • Multiplying the mean WTP of $1.53 by the average number of prescriptions per year of 9.22 yields a benefit of $14.11 per person per year • Summed over population >18 years of age • An annual benefit of nearly $12.6 million per year in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties

  14. Caution with interpreting annual benefits • “Yeah-saying” • Extrapolation to other parts of the country would be biased because WTP may differ regionally • Respondents may not account for how many prescriptions they actually fill per year

  15. Annual benefits • Conservative calculation: • assume that the estimated mean WTP of $1.53 applies for only one prescription per individual per year • Estimates an aggregate benefit of $1.36 million per year for Santa Barbara and Ventura counties and $320 million for the nation • This estimate would affect the population more equitably

  16. Comparison of benefits and costs • Substantial benefits that outweigh what would be the costs of establishing disposal programs • Special collection events • Collection events held by the Northeast Recycling Council ranged from $1,576 to $4,190 • The Bay Area Pollution Prevention Group event cost $3,645 for disposal of the collected pharmaceuticals, $86,360 for advertising, and 1,980 in staff hours Rubinstein, L. (2006). Operating unwanted medication collections - A legal and safe approach. Brattleboro, VT: Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. Available: http://www.nerc.org/adobe/setting.up.draftFINAL.pdf [2007, June 11] BAPPG. Bay Area Pollution Prevention Group. (2006). Report on the San Francisco Bay Area's Safe Medicine Disposal Days. Available: http://www.baywise.info/disposaldays/ SFBAY_SafeMeds_Report_August2006.pdf [2007, April 20].

  17. Comparison of benefits and costs • Washington State pilot program has required funding of $251,000 to cover all costs, including one-time planning and infrastructure costs, plus labor equivalent to one to two full-time employees in its first two years • The San Mateo County program, with drop off boxes at police stations, has cost $1,900 in six months of collection • The state of Maine recently allocated one-time funding of $150,000 for the Maine Drug Enforcement Agency to establish a mail-back program Gordon, R. (2007). Innovative clean-water plan a hit: Medicine disposal program elicits inquires from all over. The Mercury News [2007, February 20].

  18. Other issues • A requisite component of all the aforementioned disposal programs is a marketing or advertising campaign • Disposal programs will also encourage people to dispose of their unwanted medications instead of keeping them around the house, where there is an increasing risk of misuse • DEA regulations pose challenge

  19. Conclusion • People dispose of pharmaceuticals using methods that may harm the environment • Comparison of benefits and costs suggest ample scope for establishing pharmaceutical disposal programs that would yield positive net social benefits • Respondents are also likely to participate in a disposal program if one were established

  20. Acknowledgements • Dr. Matthew Kotchen • Community Environmental Council • Jenny Phillips • National Marine Sanctuaries Foundation • County of Santa Barbara (Resource Recovery and Waste Management Dept.) • Leslie Robinson • Santa Barbara Channelkeeper • Kira Schmidt • Dr. Trish Holden • William Lee • Paolo Gardinali, SSSC associate director

More Related