410 likes | 541 Views
New dataset of highly resolved atmospheric forcing fields for 1850-2009 Frederik Schenk & Eduardo Zorita. Working Packages. ANALOG RECONSTRUCTION. 1957 - 2007. 1850 - 2009. Motivation. I. Climatic aspects extention back to 1850: „Rebound from Little Ice Age“
E N D
New dataset of highly resolved atmospheric forcing fields for 1850-2009 Frederik Schenk & Eduardo Zorita
Working Packages ANALOG RECONSTRUCTION 1957 - 2007 1850 - 2009
Motivation • I. Climatic aspects • extention back to 1850: „Rebound from Little Ice Age“ • e.g. changes of ocean climate 1850 – 1900? • long period prior to large human impact (i.e. nutrient loads) • II. Methodical aspects • avoid spatiotemporal interpolation • daily resolution using long historical station data since 1850 • high spatial resolution of 0.25° x 0.25° for N-Europe • reconstruct „full“ variability + extremes • linear regression yields variability << 50% (von Storch et al. 2004) • non-linear approach Analog-Method von Storch et al. (2004): Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data. Science, Vol. 306, No. 5696, pp. 679-682.
Outline • - Short introduction of the Analog-Method • - Used data for the reconstruction • - Results & reconstruction skills • - Recommendations & limitations
The Analog-Method 1) Generate consistent Analog fields = numerical downscaling 2) Find Analog fields for station data = statistical upscaling Zorita & von Storch (1999): The Analog Method as a simple statistical Downscaling Technique: Comparison with more complicated Methods. Journal of Climate, Vol. 12.
ANALOGS … 1957-01-01 2007-11-30 Analog-Method: find for : 1850 2009 Reconstruction PREDICTOR (station data) …
Settings • Test: Cross-wise cal/val for 25 years • Predictand = daily analogs from RCAO model • Predictor = SLP (N=23 stations, daily resolution) • Predictor = T2m (N=22 stations, only monthly) • Increase sample size for analogs (~4500/mon): • days of month m analogs in M {m-1, m, m+1} • allows seasonal shifts if forced by predictor • BUT: doesn‘t work for daily temperature...
Used Data Timeseries: Measurements Analog-Fields: Regional Model Output
Analogs of Atmospheric Fields • Atmospheric Fields for: • Sea-Level-Pressure [Pa] • U- and V-Winds [m/s] • Relativ Humidity [%] • Total Cloud Cover [%] • Precipitation [mm] • Temperature [K] Source RCAO Swedish Regional Climate Model with Coupled Ocean-Model for Baltic Sea
Daily SLP Station Data • EMULATE Mean Sea Level Pressure data set (EMSLP) • provides 86 stations (~ 20 for RCAO-domain) • partly covers 1850 - 2002, updates from WMO etc. Ansell, T. J. et al. (2006) Daily mean sea level pressure reconstructions for the European - North Atlantic region for the period 1850-2003', Journal of Climate, vol 19, No. 12, pp 2717-2742.
Missing Data Total N = 23 stations
Results & Reconstruction Skills Calibration-Validation for 1958-1983 vs. 1984-2007 Calibration for final Reconstruction 1958-2007 Reconstruction for 1850-2009
SLP SLP-fields Fieldcor for JUN 1958-1983 Fieldcor for JAN 1958-1983 Calibration: 1984-2007
SLP U-Wind-fields Fieldcor for JUN 1958-1983 Fieldcor for JAN 1958-1983 Calibration: 1984-2007
SLP Precipitation Fieldcor for JUN 1958-1983 Fieldcor for JAN 1958-1983 Calibration: 1984-2007
SLP Rel. Humidity Fieldcor for JUN 1958-1983 Fieldcor for JAN 1958-1983 Calibration: 1984-2007
SLP Tot. Cloud-Cover Fieldcor for JUN 1958-1983 Fieldcor for JAN 1958-1983 Calibration: 1984-2007
Analysis of Daily Wind Speed Wind speed distribution 99% treshhold values
Histcount for wind speed January (N = 1550) number of events T-Test and F-Test for 0.01: no significant difference
Histcount for wind speed July (N = 1550) number of events T-Test and F-Test for 0.01: no significant difference
99 Percentiles of Wind Speed 99% treshold values for daily wind speed for JANUARY (1958-2007) RCAO RECONSTRUCTION
99 Percentiles of Wind Speed Deviation of 99% treshold values for daily wind speed (REC – RCAO)
99 Percentile of wind speed 99% treshold for wind speed [m/s] Deviation of 99% treshold [m/s] T-Test and F-Test for 0.01: no significant difference
Temperature Reconstruction weak physical link to SLP alternative reconstruction
Temperature – Struggle within • SLP is weak physical predictor for daily T2m • e.g. climate change = ΔT2m but ≠ ΔSLP • no daily T2m data available prior to 1900 • BUT monthly T2m is available from 1850 • Idea: T2m predictor monthly T2m-field-reconstr. • Add daily T2m-anomalies reconstructed by SLP • Result: 100% daily variance, good monthly CC • BUT low daily correlation, low auto correlation
SLP+T2m Temperature With use of monthly T2m predictor Reconstruction by SLP only
Recommendations & Limitations Who should use the data?
Daily vs. Monthly Scale • Monthly scale: • - all variables are showing promising skills • Daily scale: • - SLP, WIND, CLOUDS show very good skills • - PREC, HUMIDITY good in DJFM, satisfying JJA • - T2m problematic
Special Thanks to • Lars Bärring (SMHI) • Tuija Ruoho-Airola (FMI Helsinki) • Ari Venäläinen (FMI Helsinki) • Christine Luge (University of Jena) • Gerard van der Schrier (ECA&D)
Analog-Method Stat. Downscaling Stat. Upscaling Sample of Analogs PREDICTOR PREDICTAND PREDICTAND PREDICTOR Zorita & von Storch (1999): The Analog Method as a simple statistical Downscaling Technique: Comparison with more complicated Methods. Journal of Climate, Vol. 12.
T2M monthly means SLP daily anomalies
15th of April 2007 Atmospheric Blocking: Similar SLP-pattern can cause warm and cold T2m effects, i.e. in spring
99% Treshhold for daily Rain 99% treshold values for daily precipitation for JANUARY (1958-2007) RCAO RECONSTRUCTION
99% REC - RCAO Deviation of 99% treshold values for daily precipitation (REC – RCAO)