170 likes | 179 Views
This content discusses the importance of E3/Spectrum supportability for Joint Force 2020 goals. It covers the spectrum battlefield, technical advancements, regulatory challenges, and the role of MCEB FP in spectrum management. Various working groups and coordination efforts related to spectrum management are highlighted, along with the key considerations for mission success. The text emphasizes the need for coordination, planning, and adherence to guidelines to ensure operational readiness in electromagnetic environments.
E N D
JOINT STAFF J6 SPECTRUM BRANCH LtCol Wendy Goyette
Agenda • Joint Force 2020 • Importance of E3/Spectrum Supportability • Spectrum “Battlefield” • JS J6 Spectrum Mission • Role of MCEB FP • E3/Spectrum Supportability Mission Success
Joint Force 2020 Goal of Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff - JFQ 72, 1st Quarter 2014 • Forecast capabilities • Maximize ability to nurture promising technologies • Rapidly and efficiently build out new technologies • Interoperability is fundamental • Adapt to be increasingly agile
Importance of E3/Spectrum Supportability Ensure technology Fully operational weapons systems to conduct military operations when and where needed, and be interoperable and agile
Spectrum “Battlefield” OPERATIONAL: Net-centric operations, more joint operations… • Net-Centric Warfare • Higher bandwidths • Greater mobility • Greater agility • Higher tempo TECHNICAL: Four decades of rapid wireless technology development. • The need to access more spectrum • Encroachment on Federal (and military) bands • Turbo Codes • 2G • IMT-2000 • MIMO • IEEE 802.11 • Fiber • TCP/IP • OFDM • Adaptive Equalizers… • Cellular Deployment • Trellis Code Modulation • Satellite Comms • Conv. Codes • Trunked Radio • Laser Wireless Comms Emerges Telegraph Telephone Broadcast 1844 1876 1900 1920 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s REGULATORY: Increased need for more spectrum, harmonization,… • Demands for sharing and harmonization • Host nation sovereignty • World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) impact
JS Spectrum Mission • Support to Combatant Commands • Advocate for the Warfighter • Spectrum Publication Updates / Reviews • Establish requirements / provide guidance • Spectrum Management Tools • Aid data collection, spectrum allocation, host nation coordination, spectrum planning • Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS) Spectrum Supportability Document Review • Adherence to appropriate spectrum supportability guidance
Role of MCEB FP Spectrum Supportability for all DoD Systems IAW DoDI 4560.01 & CJCSI 6212.01 Produces final documents used to obtain permissions for US & HN operations SM Architectural Development & Maintenance that meets Congressional Direction to DoD CIO Produces Spectrum Architecture Oversight, Policy, & Management of DoD FreqAssignment Data Format & Database Maintains MCEB PUBs 5, 7 & 8 Manages 138-150.8 MHz, and 225-400 MHz Bands for DoD & NTIA Produces Allotment Plans for DoD operations in US Frequency Panel (FP) Chair: Co-Lead, JS/JCIE Division Permanent & Ad Hoc Working Groups (PWGs & WGs) International (I PWG) + NATO & CCEB Support Team Allotment Plan Management (APM PWG) Spectrum Management Architecture (SMA PWG) Equipment Spectrum Guidance (ESG PWG) Space Systems (SS PWG) Spectrum Operations (SO PWG) Allied Communications Publications (ACP) Ad Hoc Working Group Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) Ad Hoc Working Group Joint Communications-Electronics Operating Instruction (JCEOI) Ad Hoc Working Group DoD ITU WRC Preparation for DoD CIO; NATO & CCEB Meeting Preparation for JS/J6 Reps Produces DoD WRC positions & represents DoD at WRC meetings • Working-level coord. with DSA & other emerging technologies • Produces Implementation Roadmap & Tech Updates Coordination & Registration of DoD Satellite Systems Prepares US SATCOM orbital requests - reviews foreign requests Operational oversight of Joint CEOIs & JACS Pgm Publishes CJCSI 3320.03B; holds CCBs; conducts version testing to support fielding Authorship of DoD Spec Mgt Allied Communications Publications Maintains ACP-190 US SUPPs 1 & 2
E3/Spectrum Supportability Mission Success • Systems “compatible” with intended electromagnetic environment • Consideration of E3 early in development process • Equipment operates in the proper frequency band • Early coordination with Host Nations (HN) • User can obtain license to operate equipment (when required) • Coordination and HN approval accomplished pre-development • Legal operation of equipment with no fratricide • No program delays for failure to seek Spectrum Supportability • Ensures timely delivery of capabilities • Early defect discovery in system development • Professional education and training maintained throughout the joint force and acquisition community
Questions? CAPT Thomas O’Neill, USN GS-15 Vacant Mr. “Bow” Bowens LtCol Wendy Goyette, USMC MSG Cedric Maybank, USA Mr. Duane Jones Contractor Support Contractor Support js.pentagon.j6.list.spectrum-management Pentagon - Room 1D1057
International Spectrum Management United Nations International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (Treaty Status) Department of State ITU Member Administrations NTIA FCC Radiocommunication Sector Standardization Sector Development Sector
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) • Headquartered in Geneva Switzerland • Lead UN agency for information and communication technology issues for over 145 Years: • Coordinated the shared global use of the radio spectrum, • Promoted international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits • Worked to improve telecommunication infrastructure in the developing world • Established the worldwide standards that foster seamless interconnection of a vast range of communications systems • Membership: • 192 Member States (sovereign governments) • 700 Sector Members & Associates (e.g. telecommunications carriers, equipment manufacturers, funding bodies, research & development organizations, telecommunication organizations)
World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) • Held by International Telecommunications Union (ITU) • Amends the international Radio Regulations (RRs) • Decisions affect how radio spectrum is used • Decisions are binding on member nations • Significant potential for operational impact
US National Spectrum Management Communications Act of 1934 Executive Branch Legislative Branch Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Coordination Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) State & Local Govt., Commercial & Private Sectors 20 Government Departments and Agencies
Defense Spectrum Management • Strategic spectrum management planning • Spectrum planning • DoD requirements and policies • SM strategic plans • Capabilities development and acquisition • Equipment spectrum certification • Host Nation coordination/approval • Electromagnetic compatibility analysis • Spectrum management operations • Frequency assignments • Electromagnetic interference analysis and resolution
DoD Spectrum Management Intra-Agency Coordination DoD CIO JS/DJ6 Intra-Agency Coordination JS/VJ6 DCIO C4&IIC Intra-Agency Coordination (DoD CIO) Spectrum Policy DSO MCEB IRAC Unified & Specified Commands J6 Directorate DoD Representation Strategic Planning Office Spectrum Enterprise Services Frequency Panel JS/JCIE Co-Lead Spectrum Management or Joint Frequency Management Office Army Spectrum Mgt Office Navy-Marine Corps Spectrum Center AF Spectrum Management Organization Operational & Technical support Technical support As of 2013-08-15
Frequency Panel • Frequency Panel Structure Chartered by MCEB Pub 1 – mirrors MCEB (MCEB currently working on new Terms of Reference) • Consists of 8 subordinate Permanent Working Groups (PWGs) and two Ad-Hoc Working Groups • Organized by subject matter or specific issue • FP Chaired by J65 Dep Div Chief; PWGs Chaired by Volunteers from Service or Defense Agency Spectrum Management Offices (SMOs) • Forum brings Stakeholders and Subject Matter Experts together • Membership: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, J65A (COCOMs), DISA DSO, NSA, & ASD(NII)-Spectrum (1) • Observers (1): DISA JSC, MDA, DON CIO, others by request • Required Attendees: Steering Member from PWGs with action items • Meets monthly (with occasional “special” FP Meetings for specific issues) (1) = non-voting status