1 / 42

High Throughput Study Group WG Report and Meeting Slides

High Throughput Study Group WG Report and Meeting Slides. Jon Rosdahl jrosdahl@ieee.org. March 2003 Objectives. Help WG Resolve WG Letter ballot comments Work to create a new Task Group. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG.

alvis
Download Presentation

High Throughput Study Group WG Report and Meeting Slides

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High Throughput Study GroupWG Report and Meeting Slides Jon Rosdahl jrosdahl@ieee.org Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  2. March 2003 Objectives • Help WG Resolve WG Letter ballot comments • Work to create a new Task Group Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  3. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG • Letter Ballot 55 declared failed, with 68% Yes, and if the LB was procedural, it technically passed. • In any case, the SG processed the comments, and prepared a revised PAR and 5 Criteria • HTSG motion to send PAR and 5 Criteria to SEC passed 75-0-0 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  4. HTSG – LB55 Comment Report 281 comments 227 unique comments Comments Resolved 227 Comments Remaining 0 Comments Accepted 40 Comments Considered/ Partially accepted/declined 167 Comment Declined 20 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  5. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG (cont) • 802 rules require that 30 days prior to a plenary that any PAR and 5 Criteria be posted to the SEC members. • Due to the LB declared failed, the other 802 Chairs did not present our PAR to the other WGs • SO Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  6. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG (cont) • If WG supports the PAR and 5 Criteria, then the SEC which has the electronic copy already, will take it up at the July plenary • The SG will need to respond to any comments that are presented by 5:30pm on Tuesday July 22, 2003 by 5:30 Wed. July 23. • The SEC will consider the PAR at their Friday Meeting (July 25, 2003) Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  7. HTSG report to 802.11 WG (Cont) • NESCOM meeting is in Sept 9-11, with a posting deadline of Aug 1, 2003. • So, HTSG will ask for a continuance of the SG charter through July 2003 to respond to any comments. • May Meeting will be to start the Technical criteria definition process (see 02-798r7 clause 18 step 1) Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  8. HTSG report to 802.11WG(cont) • Output Documents: • 02-798r7 – PAR Document • 02-799r6 – 5 Criteria response Document • 03-179r0 – This report • 03-180r7 – Comment Resolution file • 03-187r0 – Minutes Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  9. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG (cont) • THANK YOU to all • 165 people attended/signed-in during this week • We have had 262 people attend/sign-in over the 4 sessions • Keep Smiling – Have Fun!! Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  10. HTSG Report to 802.11 WG (cont) End of Report Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  11. HTSG Meeting Slides Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  12. HT-SG Welcome to High Throughput Study Group Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  13. Meeting Tone • PLEASE Bring your Engineer Mentality and Technologist Attitude • Please keep a Positive Attitude • Please check your Ego and Politics at the door. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  14. Agenda Tuesday AM • 1. 8:00 AM Meeting Call to Order • 2. Review IEEE/802 & 802.11 Policies and Rules • 3. Approve/Modify Agenda • 4. Administrative issues: • Matters arising out of minutes from last meeting: • Review Objectives • 5. Letter Ballot 55 Results • 6. Discuss/Revise PAR and 5 Criteria • 7. 10:00 AMRecess until Tues PM Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  15. Agenda for Tuesday PM • 7. 7 PMReconvene : • 8. Continue Letter Ballot 55 Response • editing PAR and 5 Criteria • 9. 9:30Recess until Thursday Afternoon Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  16. Agenda for Wednesday Afternoon • 9a. 1:10 pm reconvene • 9b. Continue work on PAR and 5 Criteria response • 9C. Break from 3- 3:30 • 9d. Continue work on PAR and 5 Criteria response • 9e. 5:30 pm Recess for dinner Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  17. Agenda for Thursday Afternoon • 10. 3:30 pm reconvene • 11. Continue work on PAR and 5 Criteria response • 12. 5:30 pm Recess for dinner Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  18. Agenda for Thursday PM • 13. 7:00 PM Thursday night Reconvene • 14. Finalize PAR and 5 Criteria • Must be on server by 8:30pm (WG Motion is at 11:01am) • 15. 8:00 Coexistence Presentation • Jim Lansford • 16. 8:45 PM Develop Plan for next meeting • 17. 9:30 PM Adjourn Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  19. Agenda adoption • Moved: To adopt agenda as proposed • Moved: Adrian S. • Second: Colin l. • Vote:Unam Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  20. 2. Review IEEE/802 & 802.11 Policies and Rules • Study Group: Everyone Votes. • All 802 policies apply • All 802.11 policies apply • Submissions must meet document format criteria. • All Study Group voting requires 75% consensus. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  21. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards 6. Patents IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. This assurance shall be provided without coercion and prior to approval of the standard (or reaffirmation when a patent becomes known after initial approval of the standard). This assurance shall be a letter that is in the form of either a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the patentee will not enforce any of its present or future patent(s) whose use would be required to implement the proposed IEEE standard against any person or entity using the patent(s) to comply with the standard or b) A statement that a license will be made available without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination This assurance shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal and is irrevocable during that period. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  22. Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings • Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions • Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions or market share • Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – December 2002 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  23. Admin Stuff • Matters arising from the Nov minutes? • Approve minutes from January 2003 • Moved: Bruce K • 2nd: Adrian S. • Vote:Unam Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  24. Target Schedule for a SG • Sept. 2002 – 5 Criteria and PAR started • Nov 2002 – Progress on Draft PAR and Criteria • Jan 2003 – Finish Par and 5 Criteria Doc • Mar 2003 - Request for creation of Task Group to be sent to ExCom with 5 Criteria and PAR • Mar 2003 – Task Group Creation and Technical Presentations. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  25. Results Letter Ballot 55 •  Ballot Pool: 329 • Ballots returned: 294 -- 89% • Valid Letter Ballot • 196 Yes, 93 No, 5 Abstain • Letter Ballot Fails: 68% yes-- 32% no • 281 comments 227 unique comments Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  26. Comment Summary • 28 flagged editorial (20 done in R3) • 77 pertaining to Backward compatibility • 21 Scope too loose or too tight • 16 Concern with the rate description • 13 Channel description • 12 concern with time (too long/short) • 7 definition of Spectral Density • 3 Coexistence Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  27. Straw Poll 5:20 Wed • Question: • Do you support a maximum of 20 Mhz Channelization for HT devices for at least one mandatory mode supporting 100Mbps throughput? • 26-17-15 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  28. Straw poll 2 Wed.5:29 • Do you support at least one mandatory High Throughput Mode that meets the current regulations of worldwide geographies? • 47-5-6 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  29. HTSG Motion • Moved: Send 02-798r7 and 02-799r6 which are the PAR and 5 Criteria response to the WG for their consideration for creation of a NEW Task Group and recommend that the WG submit these documents to the SEC and to NesCom. • Move: Ken 2nd Kevin • 75-0-0 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  30. HTSG Motion • Move: Request that the 802.11 WG continue the charter of the HT-SG through the July 2003 Plenary as a contingency to respond to any outstanding comments from the WG or SEC or NESCOM as the PAR and 5 Criteria are processed should the PAR not be approved. • Moved: Jim L. 2nd Bruce K. 35-0-0 Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  31. Report to HTSG • PAR and 5 Criteria was posted at 17 past the hour. • Email was sent to the Chair of 802.11, 802.19, and the 802 chair directly, and to the closed reflector that Bob O’Hara is monitoring, and will forward to the rest of the SEC. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  32. Back-up slides Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  33. Criteria • The current rules have the following 5 Criteria listed. • See http://ieee802.org/rules.pdf Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  34. 802.11 Five Criteria • Broad Market Potential • Compatibility • Distinct Identity • Technical Feasibility • Economic Feasibility • Interference Considerations (tentative) Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  35. Criteria 6.1. Broad Market Potential A standards project authorized by IEEE 802 shall have a broad market potential. Specifically, it shall have the potential for: a) Broad sets of applicability. b) Multiple vendors and numerous users. c) Balanced costs (LAN versus attached stations). Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  36. Criteria6.2 Compatibility IEEE 802 defines a family of standards. All standards shall be in conformance with the IEEE 802.1 Architecture, Management and Interworking documents as follows: 802. Overview and Architecture, 802.1D, 802.1Q and parts of 802.1f. If any variances in conformance emerge, they shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with 802. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  37. Criteria6.2 Compatibility (cont) Each standard in the IEEE 802 family of standards shall include a definition of managed objects which are compatible with systems management standards. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  38. Criteria 6.3 Distinct Identity • Each IEEE 802 standard shall have a distinct identity. To achieve this, each authorized project shall be:a) Substantially different from other IEEE 802 standards.b) One unique solution per problem (not two solutions to a problem).c) Easy for the document reader to select the relevant specification. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  39. Criteria6.4 Technical Feasibility • For a project to be authorized, it shall be able to show its technical feasibility. At a minimum, the proposed project shall show:a) Demonstrated system feasibility.b) Proven technology, reasonable testing.c) Confidence in reliability. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  40. Criteria6.5 Economic Feasibility • For a project to be authorized, it shall be able to show economic feasibility (so far as can reasonably be estimated), for its intended applications. At a minimum, the proposed project shall show:a) Known cost factors, reliable data.b) Reasonable cost for performance.c) Consideration of installation costs. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  41. Approved Scope (75-9-4) • To define standardized modifications to both the 802.11 PHY and the 802.11 MAC so that modes of operation can be enabled that are capable of much higher throughputs, with a target minimum throughput of 100Mbps, as measured at the MAC data SAP. Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

  42. Excerpt from Operating Rules of IEEE Project 802 LMSC. • 5.1.4.2.2 ….. • “The letter ballot shall be conducted by electronic means. The response time shall be at least thirty days. However, for recirculation ballots, and for letter ballots not related to the submission of draft standards,the response time shall be at least fifteen days. …” Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear

More Related