200 likes | 379 Views
Shari’a governance. Professor Rodney Wilson Re-Imagining the Shari’a: Theory, Practice and Muslim Pluralism at Play Venice, 14 th September 2009. Contents. National shari’a boards and devolved compliance Central bank and security commission Shari’a Boards
E N D
Shari’a governance Professor Rodney Wilson Re-Imagining the Shari’a: Theory, Practice and Muslim Pluralism at Play Venice, 14th September 2009
Contents • National shari’a boards and devolved compliance • Central bank and security commission Shari’a Boards • Shari’a compliance at institutional level • IFSB Guiding Principles for Shari’a Governance • Independence and remit of shari’a scholars • Shari’a board or shari’a advisors • External or internal audit • Appointment of shari’a scholars • Qualification and experience • Contractual arrangements for remuneration and conditions • Procedures for the shari’a board meetings • Conduct, decision taking and workload planning • Shari’a assurance and the issuance of fatwa • Mechanisms and reporting • Number and status and lines of responsibility
National shari’a boards • Malaysia • National shari’a boards serves the Central Bank • In addition the Securities Commission has its own board • Only these national boards have the authority to issue fatwa • Sudan • In Sudan finance specialists and economists serve on the shari’a board of the Central Bank as well as fiqh scholars • Iran • Banks operate under the Law on Usury (Interest) Free Banking of 1983 which was approved by the Guardianship Council, the highest political and religious authority, under Ayatollah Ali Khamenei • Council is the ultimate authority on fiqh, although there is no procedure for on-going shari’a supervision at national level
Devolved shari’a compliance • Shari’a compliance at institutional level • Islamic financial institutions appoint their own Shari’a Boards • The privatization of shari’a compliance rather than its nationalization • The issues of conflicting fatwa and shari’a arbitrage • Those serving at institutional level are approved by the national Shari’a Boards in Malaysia • No system of national approval in other jurisdictions, although being considered in the UAE
IFSB Guiding Principles on Shari’a Governance • Exposure draft • Issued in December 2008 with deadline for comments 15th May 2009 • Guiding principles • Competence • Independence • Confidentiality • Consistency
General approach • 1.1 The shari’a governance structure should be commensurate and proportionate with the size, complexity and nature of the business • 1.2 Each shari’a board should have: • A clear terms of reference regarding its mandate and responsibility • Well defined operating procedures and lines of reporting • Good understanding of, and familiarity with, professional ethics and conduct
Competence • 2.1 Board members to meet an acceptable fit and proper criteria • Good character • Capability and expertise • 2.2 Provision for continuous professional development of board members • 2.3 Formal assessment of the effectiveness of each board and its members
Independence • 3.1 Strong and independent oversight role with capacity to exercise judgement • No individual or group of individuals to dominate decision making • 3.2 The board should be provided with complete, adequate and timely information prior to its meetings and as otherwise required
Confidentiality • 4.1 Shari’a Board members should ensure internal information obtained in the course of their duties is kept confidential • Implications for those who are members of multiple boards • Possible conflicts of interest
Consistency • 5.1 Board members need to understand the legal and regulatory framework in the jurisdiction where they operate • The board should promote convergence of shari’a governance standards subject to the national framework in which they work
Lines of responsibility Shariah governance structures
Shari’a Board or shari’a advisors • Status • Consultants or auditors • Fatwas mandatory, not discretionary • Number • Fully fledged Islamic financial institution may have 5 or more scholars • Conventional financial institution with an Islamic window may have only one scholar or 3 at most • Outsourcing of compliance • Applying pre-determined criteria: Dow Jones Islamic Indices • Private outsourcing companies • Yasaar (www.yasaar.org)
Independence and remit of shari’a scholars • External or internal audit • Shari’a scholars as institutional employees • Representatives of financial institution or independent outsiders • Cross sector responsibilities • Shari’a audit of banking operations and third party fund management or leasing activities • Cross border activities • Should subsidiary or affiliate operations be controlled by home or host country scholars?
Appointment of shari’a scholars • Qualification and experience • Undergraduate or postgraduate degree in fiqhmuamalet • Language competency in Arabic and English • Knowledge of commercial law and finance • Previous employment and reputation • Contractual arrangements for remuneration and conditions • Permanent or ad hoc appointments • Retention fee plus hourly/daily remuneration and travel and accommodation expenses
Work of the shari’a board • Duties and responsibilities • Review new financial contracts for shari’a compliance • Liaise with Islamic financial institution’s legal team and external firms drafting contracts • Monitor current operations of Islamic financial institution • Investigation • Study of fiqh muamalat • Examination of fatwa by other shari’acommittee • Referral to AAOIFI shari’a standards • Published rulings by Fiqh Academy, national shari’a board, if any, and London based Institute of Islamic Banking and Insurance (www.islamic-banking.com)
Legal interpretation through ijtihad • Universal conformism or taqlid • Follow religious authority • Devotion to basic principles, qawaid • The most broadly based legal maxims or generally agreed norms • Approach deductive rather than inductive • Scope for ijtihad, interpretation of Islamic law • Need for ijtihad given increasingly complexity of finance and demand for shariah compliance • Traditional ijtihad involved a single scholar • Group or team ijtihad gives modern reinterpretations greater weight
Procedures for shari’a board meetings • Conduct of meetings • Determination of agenda • Minutes of previous meetings, actions and follow-up • Minutes of current meeting and assignment of tasks • Decision taking • Rulings unanimous rather than by majority vote • Ijma or the consensus of opinions • Power of veto by committee members • Workload planning • Frequency of meetings • Preparation for meetings and circulation of documents • Pro-active or re-active role of shari’a board • Interaction with financial professionals
Shari’a assurance and the issuance of fatwa • Mechanisms • Compliance statements in annual reports • Web materials on shari’a board composition and rulings • Outreach activity by shari’a scholars • Explanation of fatwa • Issuance of fatwa only or with detailed justification • Responsibility of shari’a board or internal shari’a control department in using minutes as basis for explanation • Concern with consistency with other fatwa
International shari’a guidance • National sovereignty and shari’a law • International shari’a bodies • OIC Fiqh Academy • Represents 56 Muslim countries • Al Azhar University • Oldest centre for Islamic scholarship • International Islamic Financial Institutions • Islamic Financial Services Board • Guidelines and standards for the regulation of Islamic financial institutions • AAOIFI • Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions • Islamic Development Bank • Shari’a compliant development assistance agency