240 likes | 536 Views
RHETORIC. DEFINITION OF RHETORIC. a thoughtful, reflective activity (written or spoken) leading to effective communication, including rational exchange of opposing viewpoints “ The faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion ”- Aristotle
E N D
DEFINITION OF RHETORIC • a thoughtful, reflective activity (written or spoken) leading to effective communication, including rational exchange of opposing viewpoints • “The faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion”- Aristotle • A tool that can be used to appeal to an audience of one or many • to resolve conflicts without confrontation, persuade readers, move people to take action
KEY ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC CONTEXT PURPOSE THESIS SPEAKER AUDIENCE SPEAKER (WRITER) (ARISTOTELIAN TRIANGLE) AUDIENCE (READER) SUBJECT (TOPIC)
CONTEXT: • rhetoric is always situational • the occasion, time and place rhetoric is written or spoken -can arise from current events or cultural bias • PURPOSE: • the goal that the speaker or writer wants to achieve
PURPOSES FOR WRITING • EXPRESS AND REFLECT • INFORM AND EXPLAIN • EVALUATE AND JUDGE • INQUIRE AND EXPLORE • ANALYZE AND INTERPRET • TAKE A STAND/PROPOSE A SOLUTION • OTHERS: Win agreement, persuade to take action, evoke sympathy, make someone laugh, inform, provoke, celebrate, repudiate, put forth a proposal, secure support, bring about a favorable decision
THESIS: • the main idea of your rhetoric must be crystal clear a claim or assertion • SPEAKER (writer) • a writer considers the PERSONA they are writing as poet, comedian, scholar, expert, literary critic, concerned citizen • AUDIENCE • determines style and organization of your piece • what do they know about the subject? What’s its attitude toward the subject?
APPEALS TO ETHOS, LOGOS, PATHOS • ETHOS: character -appealing to ethos demonstrates that the author is credible and trustworthy -emphasizes shared values between the speaker and the audience -sometimes a speaker’s reputation immediately establishes ethos -TONE effects ETHOS
LOGOS: reason • appeal to LOGOS by offering clear, rational ideas • having a clear, main idea or thesis with specific details, examples, facts, statistical data, or expert testimony as support • ideas must be logical • make assumptions about the reader • acknowledge a counter argument (anticipate opposing views)
PATHOS: emotion • appeal to emotion • choose language that engages the emotions of the audience • connotation of words, vivid and concrete description, figurative language, adding visual elements • propaganda (arguments that appeal solely to emotion – usually very weak)
ARRANGEMENT OF RHETORIC • THE CLASSIC MODEL • Five-part structure -introduction (exordium) -narration (narration) -confirmation (confirmatio) -refutation (refutation) -conclusion (peroratio)
Introduction (“exordium”) • introduces the reader to the subject under discussion • “beginning a web” • can be a single paragraph or several • draws the reader into a text by piquing their interest, challenging them or otherwise getting their attention • often where ETHOS is established
narration (“narratio”) • provides factual information and background material on the subject • or establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing • level of detail here depends on audiences knowledge of subject
confirmation (“confirmatio”) • usually the major part of the text • nuts and bolts: most specific, concrete details of the text • makes strongest appeal to logos
refutation (“refutation”) • addresses the counterargument
conclusion (peroratio) • can be one paragraph or several • brings the essay to a satisfying close • writer appeals to pathos and reminds reader of ethos established earlier • does not just repeat what has gone before, but brings all the writers ideas together andanswers the question “SO WHAT?” • the last words are most likely what the audience will remember
PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT • Writers pick a certain pattern depending on their purpose: • NARRATION • DESCRIPTION • PROCESS ANALYSIS • EXEMPLIFICATION • COMPARE/CONTRAST • CLASSIFICATION • DEFINITION • CAUSE/EFFECT
NARRATION • telling a story or recounting a series of events • can be based on personal experience or knowledge gained from reading or observation • usually chronological • includes concrete detail, a point of view, elements such as dialogue • not simply telling an appealing story, but crafting a story that SUPPORTS YOUR THESIS (YOU MUST HAVE A POINT/REASON FOR TELLING THE STORY!! DECIDE WHAT THAT IS, THEN INCLUDE ONLY DETAILS THAT SUPPORT THAT POINT) • often used as a way to draw readers into a subject
DESCRIPTION • like narration, but emphasizes the senses by painting a picture of how something looks, sounds smells tastes or feels. • often used to establish a mood or atmosphere • rarely is an entire essay descriptive (but it can make writing more persuasive: SHOWING IS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN TELLING – will make readers empathize with you)
PROCESS ANALYSIS • explains how something works, how to do something or how something was done • the key to successful process analysis is CLARITY • use clear, logical language • use transitions that make the sequence of major steps, stages or phases in the process
EXEMPLIFICATION • providing examples to make a point • turns a general idea into a concrete one • INDUCTION: a series of specific examples that lead to a general conclusion
COMPARISON AND CONTRAST • juxtaposing two things to highlight their similarities and differences • often used for literary analysis – to compare method, style and purpose of two texts • can be organized subject-by-subject or point-by-point • example: compare/contrast two candidates: • subject-by-subject: discuss one candidate fully, then the other • point-by-point: discuss where each candidate stands on different issues
CLASSIFICATION AND DIVISION • sorting material or ideas into major categories
DEFINITION • defining something ensures the reader and writer are on the same page • often the first step in a debate or disagreement • might be only a paragraph or might be an entire essay
CAUSE AND EFFECT • analyzing the causes that lead to a certain effect (or vice versa) • a powerful foundation for an argument • often signaled by a “why” in the title or first paragraph