1 / 51

Beyond the Lemma: Inflection-Specific Constructions in English

Beyond the Lemma: Inflection-Specific Constructions in English. Sally Rice and John Newman University of Alberta AACL 2008 BYU 14 March 2008. Bertrand Russell’s Emotive Conjugations. I’m tenacious you’re stubborn he’s pigheaded. singular. 1 2 3. inflection-specific

amena-hanson
Download Presentation

Beyond the Lemma: Inflection-Specific Constructions in English

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beyond the Lemma:Inflection-Specific Constructions in English Sally Rice and John Newman University of Alberta AACL 2008 BYU 14 March 2008

  2. Bertrand Russell’s Emotive Conjugations I’mtenacious you’restubborn he’spigheaded singular 1 2 3

  3. inflection-specific meaning and behavior (idiosyncracies of meaning, form, collocation, genre, and distribution)

  4. Form Idiosyncracies in a TypicalAthapaskan Verb Paradigm

  5. Form Idiosyncracies in another TypicalAthapaskan Verb Paradigm

  6. TAM-Based Idiosyncracies of some Basic Verbs Rice & Newman 2005

  7. SUBJ x TAM Idiosyncracies in BNCallRice & Newman 2005 GO

  8. SUBJ x TAM Idiosyncracies in BNCallRice & Newman 2005 GO

  9. SUBJ x TAM Idiosyncracies in BNCCCRice & Newman 2005 THINK

  10. SUBJ x TAM Idiosyncracies in BNCCCRice & Newman 2005 THINK

  11. VVB-base VVZ-3sg.pres VVI-inf VVD-past VVG-prog VVN-perf part rid allow

  12. Inflectional idiosyncracies of EAT and DRINKNewman & Rice 2003

  13. Distributional idiosyncracies of A, Aer, AestNewman & Rice 2006

  14. Distributional idiosyncracies of A, Aer, AestNewman & Rice 2006

  15. Distributional idiosyncracies of A, Aer, AestNewman & Rice 2006

  16. Collocational idiosyncracies of A, Aer, AestNewman & Rice 2006

  17. Collocational idiosyncracies of A, Aer, AestNewman & Rice 2006

  18. Really idiosyncratic gradable As

  19. Really idiosyncratic gradable As

  20. inflection-specific meaning and behavior (idiosyncracies of meaning, form, collocation, genre, and distribution)  Commitment to usage-based approaches like CG, RCG language-specific construction-specific inflection-specific Application of corpus linguistic methodologies and mindset

  21. Inflectional Islands Syntactic (constructional), semantic, and collocational properties tend to inhere in individual inflections of a lexical item in a register-specific manner. These properties may not extend across all the inflections (the paradigm) to characterize the lemma as a whole.

  22. English Pronominal Inflection searched BNC and CAE with Mark Davies’ corpus tool: Variation in English Words and Phrases: http://view.byu.edu tracked person & case distribution/skew for pronouns examined frequencies and collocations

  23. English Pronominal Inflection NOM ACC/ POSS IND REFLEX OBL DET POSS 1SGI me my mine myself 2 you you your yours yourself/ves 3SG.M he him his his himself 3SG.F she her her hers herself 3SG.N it it its its itself 1PL we us our ours ourself/ves 3PL they them their theirs themself/ves

  24. English Pronominal Inflection NOM ACC/ POSS IND REFLEX OBL DET POSS 1SGI me my mine myself 2 you you your yours yourself/ves 3SG.M he him his his himself 3SG.F she her her hers herself 3SG.N it it its its itself 1PL we us our ours ourself/ves 3PL they them their theirs themself/ves

  25. English Pronominal Inflection NOM ACC/ POSS IND REFLEX OBL DET POSS 1SGI me my mine myself 2 you you your yours yourself/ves 3SG.M he him his his himself 3SG.F she her her hers herself 3SG.N it it its its itself 1PL we us our ours ourself/ves 3PL they them their theirs themself/ves

  26. Top 20 Collocates for Pro + V (=NOM)

  27. Top 20 Collocates for Pro + V (=NOM)

  28. Percent Attraction of Pro to Pro + CAN Frame Attraction of “he” = (no. of “he+CAN” in construction over total no. of “he” in corpus) x100, following Schmid 2000)

  29. Percent Attraction of Pro to Pro + WILL Frame Attraction of “he” = (no. of “he+WILL” in construction over total no. of “he” in corpus) x100, following Schmid 2000)

  30. Collostructional Analysis of 3SG + CAN/WILL Collostructional analysis based on attraction/repulsion of “she/he/it” to the construction “Pro + CAN” or “Pro + WILL” [size of corpus = number of verbs (V*)]; Stefanowitsch & Gries 2003

  31. PRO like to vs. PRO hope to (BNC-cc) you like to I hope to

  32. PRO like to vs. PRO hope to (BNC-cc) you like to I hope to

  33. English Pronominal Inflection NOM ACC/ POSS IND REFLEX OBL DET POSS 1SGI me my mine myself 2 you you your yours yourself/ves 3SG.M he him his his himself 3SG.F she her her hers herself 3SG.N it it its its itself 1PL we us our ours ourself/ves 3PL they them their theirs themself/ves

  34. Top 20 Collocates for V + Pro (=ACC?)

  35. Top 20 Collocates for V + Pro (=ACC?)

  36. Top 20 Collocates for V + Pro (=ACC?)

  37. Top 20 Collocates for V + Pro (=ACC?)

  38. Top 10 Collocates for P + Pro (=OBL)

  39. Top 10 Collocates for P + Pro (=OBL)

  40. Distributional Idiosyncracies (CAEall+ BNCall) prep + PRO Reliance of “to+me” (= no. of “to+me” in corpus over total no. of PREP+PRO in corpus) x100, following Schmid 2000)

  41. English Pronominal Inflection NOM ACC/ POSS IND REFLEX OBL DET POSS 1SGI me my mine myself 2 you you your yours yourself/ves 3SG.M he him his his himself 3SG.F she her her hers herself 3SG.N it it its its itself 1PL we us our ours ourself/ves 3PL they them their theirs themself/ves

  42. Top 20 Collocates for Pro’s NP (=GEN)

  43. Distributional Idiosyncracies (AECall+ BNCall) my KINTERM Reliance of “my+mother” (= no. of “my+mother” in corpus over total no. of PRO.POSS+NN* in corpus) x100, following Schmid 2000)

  44. 3SG Distributional Idiosyncracies (BNCall)

  45. 1SG Distributional Idiosyncracies by Genre

  46. 1PL Distributional Idiosyncracies by Genre

  47. Our Manifesto de-lemmatize! inflected forms have a life of their own (Tao 2001, 2003) put lemmas aside (as done earlier with syntactic rule in favor of constructions) substitute words-in-context or WICs (intersection of genre, register, & inflection) aim low! find the “hierarchy of lower-level structures...[that] specify the actual array of subcases and specific instances that support and give rise to the higher-level generalization” RWL, Concept, Image, & Symbol, 1991:281-282

More Related