250 likes | 443 Views
Model Based Control Strategies. Model Based Control. 1- Inverse Model as a Forward Controller (Inverse Dynamics) 2- Forward Model in Feedback 3- Combination of above. Inverse Model (Dynamic). Reference. Output. G(s). G -1 (s). Controller. Plant. Control Signal. Forward Model. q d.
E N D
Model Based Control • 1- Inverse Model as a Forward Controller (Inverse Dynamics) • 2- Forward Model in Feedback • 3- Combination of above
Inverse Model (Dynamic) Reference Output G(s) G-1(s) Controller Plant Control Signal
Forward Model qd b q Plant G(s) Controller Gc(s) Plant Model
Reference Output Plant Controller Control Signal a) Delay Output Reference Plant Delay Controller Control Signal b)
Smith Predictor, 1958 qd b q Plant G(s) Controller Gc(s) G*(s)
Smith Predictor (cont.) qd b q Plant G(s) Controller Gc(s) Gm(s) - G*(s)
Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., Wolpert, D. M., and Stein, J. F., (1993), "Is the Cerebellum a Smith Predictor ?",Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 203-216.
Model Predictive Control (MPC) • Receding (Finite) Horizon Control • Using Time (Impulse/Step) Response • Based on Optimal Control with Constraints
Model Predictive Control q b qd Plant Controller Td Optimizer qm Plant & Disturbance Model
Comparison of MPC & Smith Predictor Case Plant Plant Model Plant Model Delay Delay I 1/[s(s+wc)] 1/[s(s+wc)] 150 150 II 1/[s(s+wc)] 1/[s(s+wc)] 150 250 III 1/[s(s+wc)] 1/[s(s+wm)] 150 150 IV 1/[s(s+wc)] 1/[s(s+wm)] 150 250 V (s-0.5)/[s(s+wc)] (s-0.5)/[s(s+wc)] 150 150 wc = 2*pi*(0.9), wm = 2*pi*(0.54), Gc=20, time delay is in ms.
Time (s) Smith Predictor and MPC Outputs for Perfect Model
Time (s) Smith Predictor and MPC Outputs for Time Delay Mismatch
Time (s) Smith Predictor and MPC Outputs for Non-Minimum Phase System
Comparison of MPC & Smith Predictor ( Cont. ) Error Case I Case II Case III Case IV Case V SPC 0.2664 0.3096 0.3271 0.3830 0.2485 MPC 0.0519 0.1363 0.1428 0.2525 0.0303 SPC = Smith Predcitor Controller, MPC = Model Predictive Controller, Error is root mean square errors (rad).